What, in your view, was the short term significance of the Battle of the Somme?

Authors Avatar

Hollie Selby

What, in your view, was the short term significance of the Battle of the Somme?

The Battle of the Somme has been widely viewed as the bloodiest and most futile effort displayed within World War I and all for what appeared an unsubstantial gain. This perception, however, has been tainted throughout the years through the horrors instilled by accounts from soldiers and others emotionally connected with the event. This biased view has surpassed the significance the battle held and the achievements that were gained through its occurrence, although it is highly debatable to whether these outweigh the tragedy the battle inflicted on Britain.

The most largely regarded disaster of the battle was the amount of lives lost; The British Army had suffered 420,000 casualties including nearly 60,000 on the first day alone, for very little territorial gain. However, although the gain appeared miniscule, only 12km at the deepest point, it was significant in maintaining control and power over allied lands. This is because it prevented Germany from occupying Verdun, this could have easily lead to the take over of France and therefore leaving Britain in a vulnerable state and open to defeat. Along with this, the gain had a damaging effect on German morale which could have had detrimental damage to their performance and overall faith in a victory. However, the allied forces morale was not in a much more desirable state, the conditions within the trenches and the constant ascending death toll was not what the inexperienced soldiers had predicted when they came forward to the front line. Their damning day to day life was to spark off a wave of war poetry and criticizing comments from those involved in the battle and those who had been emotionally affected by it, which included most of the British population. These, however, can prove unreliable as they are influenced by the tragedies happening around them and are not aware of the bigger picture, giving us a very narrow view and opinion of the battle.

Within the Battle of the Somme, and World War one in general, defensive warfare using attrition tactics was commonplace. This can be considered as insignificant as subsequent wars, such as the Battle of Ypres, still held on to these tactics, even after the great losses, one of the clear indications that new tactics were needed. However, although it took an unnecessary amount of time, once new technique’s and been put into place, warfare never looked back and avoided the drawn-out and expensive technique in favour of a rapid, decisive and mobile strike as those displayed in World War two through the use of methods such as Blitzkrieg.

Join now!

 

Another factor significant to the overall defeat of the German forces was that, although both opposing sides were subject to a similar amount of casualties, they were of a greater military loss to the Germans. At the start of 1916 Haig’s army was comprised of inexperienced and poorly trained soldiers which was the result of Lord Kitcheners “Citizen Army” which had been called for as a response to the start of the war. Although their loss was of great proportions to the country as a whole, it was of little military significance and their lives were quite easily ...

This is a preview of the whole essay