• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What influence did the Suez Crisis have on British decolonisation 1956-64?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What influence did the Suez Crisis have on British decolonisation 1956-64? The Suez Crisis of 1956 played a large in British decolonisation of the Empire between the period of 1956-64. The crisis and its effects, upset British confidence and prestige; however, the Crisis was not the single cause of the demise of the British Empire. The military action at the Suez Canal in 1956 can be seen as a success, as the British achieved their aim of driving the Egyptians out of the Suez Canal. However, the war was a diplomatic disaster. Britain was seen as the aggressor and also fallible. It led to a worldwide outcry and Britain was openly criticised by the USA and President Eisenhower. It seemed to the Empire that Britain was incapable of conducting a foreign policy independently of the USA. ...read more.

Middle

The poor state of the economy can be seen by the desperate need for American aid and the rationing, which was still in place in the 1950s. Education improved in these countries, as did the desire for independence, especially after soldiers from the Empire fought side by side with British soldiers in the two world wars. Due to Britain's desperation for allies during World War Two, in exchange for the sending of soldiers from the Empire, they agreed that independence would be granted after the war because the politicians of the colonies argued that if they were good enough to fight and die alongside British soldiers, they deserved their independence. Therefore, it can be seen that decolonisation was being thought and planned well before the Suez Crisis. ...read more.

Conclusion

opposed to the idea of Empire, it may have been necessary to simply sacrifice our empire for the sake of the "special relationship". MacMillan's "wind of change" speech in February 1960 was seen by some as a sign to British colonies in Africa that independence was available. This could be seen as an attempt by MacMillan to improve Anglo-American relations ruined by the Suez Crisis, by giving up her Empire. It can be seen that Suez was a very important factor in Britain's rapid decolonisation between 1956 and 1964, and it was the cause of many spin-offs factors. However, it was not the sole reason with the rising nationalism and violence attributed with it, the Empire's failure to generate enough profit and the state of the British economy following the huge expenditure of the war effort. Nick Clarke - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    * US public opinion had turned decidedly against involvement in Vietnam. * Nixon hoped that a deal with USSR over nuclear arms might encourage them to use their influence with North Vietnam to secure an end to the conflict. * Two new nuclear weapons developed between 1966-8 made a limited

  2. To what extent can the Suez Canal crisis of 1956 been said to have ...

    29, 1956. Within a few days France and Great Britain sent armed forces to retake the Suez Canal.

  1. Europe and the Suez Crisis 1956 - To what extent was the military action ...

    my colleagues and I are convinced that we must be ready, in the last resort, to use force to bring Nasser to his senses. " 2 In "Mastering Modern World History" it is revealed that a secret Anglo-American plan called Omega suggested to overthrow Nasser by using political and economic pressure3.

  2. Did Formal Decolonisation Lead to Substantive Independence for Former Colonies? Choose at Least Two ...

    loyal to the crown, particularly in terms of military support.5 This is exemplified in the views of traditionalists such as Winston Churchill wanted to hold onto the empire for both calculated and sentimentalist reasons.6 However Britain could not hold onto her colonies forever nor impose polices which did not please the local inhabitants.

  1. Was it the technological or tactical changes which had the greater influence in determining ...

    the field, and when city walls became stronger than the guns of a besieger, then a war of movement, of pitched battles sought and accepted and victory in the field leading to the quick capture of cities, which had occurred during Charles VIII's initial invasion, was no longer possible.

  2. To what extent do these sources differ in their view of the American reaction ...

    On the other hand, the words understand and accept do not however mean wholehearted approval or agreement with Britain's tactics. There are perhaps some valid reasons for the disagreement between the two sources and even within the sources themselves. For example, source A was written on 25th September 1956 which

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work