• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What key factors explain Germany's changing relations with Italy in the years 1933-1939?

Extracts from this document...


What key factors explain Germany's changing relations with Italy in the years 1933-1939? Italy and Germany had never been destined to be natural allies. Italy had always been in a position where she had the option to choose her allies - in the First World War, she had had the choice between Germany and Austro-Hungary on one side, or Britain and France on the other. Even then, following alliance with the Austro-Germans, she took a year of neutrality and switched sides - there was no affinity to one side for Italy. Regardless, Hitler had long strived for alliance with Italy, as he considered it another great power in Europe, besides himself, despite the outlook of this occurring being somewhat bleak until around 1936. Between 1933 and 1936, relations between the two nations had been somewhat stale. Mounting tension in Austria in 1934, due to the Austrian Nazis causing agitation, led to the Rome protocols - a series of agreements between Austria, Hungary and Italy, calling for closer trading relations and common policy between them, amongst other factors. It also saw Austria becoming increasingly dependant on Italy for protection, in fear of the ever-hostile Germany. Despite this being against him, Hitler was still intent on forging good relations with Mussolini. ...read more.


not naturally develop from Abyssinia, and it would take a series of agreements and pressure yet until any true alliance would form. In 1936, the Anti-Comintern Pact was signed between Germany and Japan, as unification against communist influence from the Soviet Union. In reflection of the small amount of common interest between Nazi German and Fascist Italian ideology, Italy later joined the pact in 1937. Italy joining the pact formed what would come to be known as the "Axis Powers"; those who opposed the western allies in the Second World War. Another factor which brought Italy and Germany closer together around this time was the outbreak of the Spanish civil war. Under request of the Spanish government, Germany joined the war and supported General Franco's rebellion. Hitler's reasoning and argument for this action was that he wanted to save Europe from "communist barbarianism". Aside from this, Italy was also supporting Franco, leaving Hitler with the hope that a Nationalist victory would bring himself and Mussolini closer. Thankfully for Hitler, his hope became reality, and he did benefit from closer ties with Mussolini. However, there was still no real alliance between the two, and Mussolini was reluctant to forge one - he could still turn back to Britain and France. ...read more.


Yet, perhaps still, the fear of fighting against Germany and the prospects of Mediterranean expansion would have drawn him towards Hitler instead - after all, he did believe the western allies to be weak in comparison. The supposed political affinity between the two nations bared no benefits to their relations, as despite their few similarities, Italy and Germany were quite ideologically different. Many may say that Mussolini's invasion of Abyssinia was the key factor in determining the relationship between the two, but had it not been for Hitler's persistence following this, little would have come of the situation. Closer they may have been, but until a solid alliance was formed in the shape of the Pact of Steel, Mussolini and Hitler were not particularly close, only sharing a small amount of common interest. Should the two nations ever have really become allies? Their expansionist aims may have complimented one another, but Hitler was not one to be trusted. Had Mussolini chosen to ally with Britain and France, would the consequences of Hitler's endless striving been any less severe on Europe? Hitler may have been less confident in going about his aims, but it is likely they would have still taken place - as much as he strived for alliance with Mussolini, a lack of it would be unlikely to stop him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Was Hitler a weak dictator?

    This was the first actions he took to establish good relations with the army. But, also he created the SS that infiltrated every organism in Germany, including the army. However, he never used the power of the Gestapo, or he couldn't so so, in order to infiltrate the army.

  2. "Nazi policy towards the Jews up to 1939 was uncoordinated and erratic."

    to sell their businesses 'voluntarily' at prices well below there market rate to their German Aryan counterparts. In a meeting in April 1937 Hitler explained his standpoint in reference to the Nazi Jewish policy which suggests further radicalization: "I mean to destroy you.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    The totalitarian system in the period of modern technical development can dispense with them; the means of communication alone make it possible to mechanize the lower leadership. As a result of this there arises the new type of the uncritical recipient of orders.

  2. To what extent did Hitlers Policies attract working class support between 1933 and 1939?

    of deep bitterness"13; which is a valid historical judgment in this instance, combining the emotional impact of this act with pre-existing oppositional sentiment. The disposition of older industrial workers could not be overturned by the propaganda of Ley, "Germany has sung the praises of the working man"14 which appeared hypocritical given the removal of rights.

  1. Mussolini wanted to make Italy 'great, respected and feared'. How far had he succeeded ...

    Measures that he did introduce were largely inspired by the previous Liberal governments' attempts and were not far - reaching. He attempted to initiate the revolutionary Corporative State; the 'Third Way', in which employers and employees would unite to make Italy a classless society.

  2. To What Extent Did Mussolini Achieve his Foreign Policy Aims of making Italy "Great ...

    Mussolini was frustrated by the failures of his aims of the 1920's. Therefore, Mussolini emerged as Europe's senior statesman as he had always intended. This gained the respect he had always wanted. Mussolini did this by reshuffling the cabinet in 1932.

  1. Evaluate the Nazis economic policies from 1933 - 1939. To what extent were the ...

    Two "Reinhardt Programs" were published to subsidize motor-road, residential and agricultural buildings' repair and reconstruction. The abolition of the motor-vehicle tax and the reduction of various taxes, such as the land tax (Grundsteuer), greatly encouraged consumption, productivity and private investments, which in return increased more job opportunities.

  2. Compare and contrast the situation in Italy 1919-22 with that in Germany 1919-29.

    Germans didn't feel safe as home anymore considering that the Treaty disarmed German and had placed troops in the Rhineland for strategic political reasons. In addition to the sorrow that came along with the treaty was the difficulties Ebert faced n running the government after the war including threats from

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work