• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What key factors explain Germany's changing relations with Italy in the years 1933-1939?

Extracts from this document...


What key factors explain Germany's changing relations with Italy in the years 1933-1939? Italy and Germany had never been destined to be natural allies. Italy had always been in a position where she had the option to choose her allies - in the First World War, she had had the choice between Germany and Austro-Hungary on one side, or Britain and France on the other. Even then, following alliance with the Austro-Germans, she took a year of neutrality and switched sides - there was no affinity to one side for Italy. Regardless, Hitler had long strived for alliance with Italy, as he considered it another great power in Europe, besides himself, despite the outlook of this occurring being somewhat bleak until around 1936. Between 1933 and 1936, relations between the two nations had been somewhat stale. Mounting tension in Austria in 1934, due to the Austrian Nazis causing agitation, led to the Rome protocols - a series of agreements between Austria, Hungary and Italy, calling for closer trading relations and common policy between them, amongst other factors. It also saw Austria becoming increasingly dependant on Italy for protection, in fear of the ever-hostile Germany. Despite this being against him, Hitler was still intent on forging good relations with Mussolini. ...read more.


not naturally develop from Abyssinia, and it would take a series of agreements and pressure yet until any true alliance would form. In 1936, the Anti-Comintern Pact was signed between Germany and Japan, as unification against communist influence from the Soviet Union. In reflection of the small amount of common interest between Nazi German and Fascist Italian ideology, Italy later joined the pact in 1937. Italy joining the pact formed what would come to be known as the "Axis Powers"; those who opposed the western allies in the Second World War. Another factor which brought Italy and Germany closer together around this time was the outbreak of the Spanish civil war. Under request of the Spanish government, Germany joined the war and supported General Franco's rebellion. Hitler's reasoning and argument for this action was that he wanted to save Europe from "communist barbarianism". Aside from this, Italy was also supporting Franco, leaving Hitler with the hope that a Nationalist victory would bring himself and Mussolini closer. Thankfully for Hitler, his hope became reality, and he did benefit from closer ties with Mussolini. However, there was still no real alliance between the two, and Mussolini was reluctant to forge one - he could still turn back to Britain and France. ...read more.


Yet, perhaps still, the fear of fighting against Germany and the prospects of Mediterranean expansion would have drawn him towards Hitler instead - after all, he did believe the western allies to be weak in comparison. The supposed political affinity between the two nations bared no benefits to their relations, as despite their few similarities, Italy and Germany were quite ideologically different. Many may say that Mussolini's invasion of Abyssinia was the key factor in determining the relationship between the two, but had it not been for Hitler's persistence following this, little would have come of the situation. Closer they may have been, but until a solid alliance was formed in the shape of the Pact of Steel, Mussolini and Hitler were not particularly close, only sharing a small amount of common interest. Should the two nations ever have really become allies? Their expansionist aims may have complimented one another, but Hitler was not one to be trusted. Had Mussolini chosen to ally with Britain and France, would the consequences of Hitler's endless striving been any less severe on Europe? Hitler may have been less confident in going about his aims, but it is likely they would have still taken place - as much as he strived for alliance with Mussolini, a lack of it would be unlikely to stop him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Was Hitler a weak dictator?

    This way he vanished the influence of socialists on the industrial area of Germany imposing his power and using any means possible to remove any sort of opposition. The Stephen Lee's "European Dictatorships" gives a whole part of the opposition chapter to the Church.

  2. How far were the policies of Chamberlain in facing the challenges from Nazi Germany ...

    Andrew Boxer tells us that many people in Britain were anxious to avoid war and actively supported the policy of appeasement2. Chamberlain believed that appeasement was only fair in reversing the harsh measures implemented with The Treaty of Versailles. Many people, for example Lloyd George, believed that some of the measures were too harsh.

  1. Evaluate the Nazis economic policies from 1933 - 1939. To what extent were the ...

    Not only were there economic recovery and reorganization taking place in the cities, but there were also two important measures performed in the rural areas of Germany as well. The first one was the emergence of "Reich Food Estate" (Reichsnahrstand)

  2. International Relations in WWII

    Italy also joined this pact in November of 1937, firming the alliance between the axis powers. Japan then assaulted China again in 1937. The only country that could sway Japanese invasion in China was the United States, which maintained her policy of isolation.


    A leader who took advantage of a situation, seeking neither war nor an unrightfull territory. This is in essence the character that the opportunist argument believes Hitler to be.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    Yet nothing was left to chance on these occasions. Every device for heightening the emotional intensity, every trick of the theatre was used. The Nuremberg rallies held every year in September were masterpieces of theatrical art, with the most carefully devised effects.

  1. The people(TM)s community(TM). How far did Nazi policies between 1933 and 1939 go ...

    They were seen as 'burdens on the community'. The Nazis believed that sterilization was the key and it was made compulsory. In 1939, they decided that euthanasia was the answer. They were killed by starvation, a lethal injection or by gassing. The Asocials who were anybody who didn't fit into the Volksgemeinschaft.

  2. Compare and contrast the situation in Italy 1919-22 with that in Germany 1919-29.

    Germans didn't feel safe as home anymore considering that the Treaty disarmed German and had placed troops in the Rhineland for strategic political reasons. In addition to the sorrow that came along with the treaty was the difficulties Ebert faced n running the government after the war including threats from

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work