• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What measures did Stalin take to maintain power?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What measures did Stalin take to maintain power? After Lenin's death in 1924 the Bolshevik Politburo decided to rule Russia together. However, the rivalry among them started quickly as some of them, truly, wanted to be Lenin's successor. The two main rivals were Trotsky and Stalin, both members of the Politburo, the top section within the party. However, looking back from today we can see that Trotsky never really opposed a real threat to Stalin who would become the new leader of Russia officially in 1929. In this essay I will explain why Stalin became the new communist leader and examine what measures ho took to maintain his power after he successfully had won over both Trotsky, the right group of the party and the left group. When Lenin died in 1924 Stalin had all ready built up a network of supporters. In 1922 Stalin had been given the position as General Secretary of the Bolshevik party. It was a very powerful position but it had merely been realised by anyone but Stalin himself. He could view important documents and he could appoint new party workers/members as well as dismiss them. Silently but effectively Stalin began to organise his network - his supporters were given key positions within the party, while people who opposed Stalin or Stalin opposed/disliked were positioned in distant areas of Russia. ...read more.

Middle

The fact that he hadn't joined the party until after the 1917 rebellions irritated many of the "Old-Bolsheviks" that had been members since the creation of the party. Trotsky was also a very intelligent man (Stalin was probably too, but did not show it as Trotsky did) and that worked against him. Lenin described him as the "most capable man in the present Central Committee" (extract from Lenin's testament, 25th December 1922). Trotsky's competence mounted the dislike for him and lead to men within the party working together and doing anything to prevent him from gaining power, such as voting for Stalin instead. However, Stalin strategically betrayed all these men that he had co-operated with. The right - Bukharin, Rykov and Tomsky, and the left - Trotsky, Kamenev and Zinoview. They were all removed at an early stage in Stalin's USSR. He used his position as General Secretary to dismiss them from the party or to reposition them. Stalin had also introduced a system of threat of expulsion. Workers within the party had to have Party cards. If you lost your party card you could not participate in any Bolshevik activities and you could not get food stamps, jobs or housing etc. When somebody in the party was to be removed he would be asked for his card. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin also introduced a new constitution in 1936 that would appear to be more democratic by allowing voting by secret ballot. Everyone in Russia could vote for members to the national assembly, the Supreme Soviet. However, the Supreme Soviet did not have much power. It elected ministers to the Praesidium to act on its behalf and Stalin was also the secretary of it, thus he controlled the Praesidium too but at the same time it looked as if he had introduced a more democratic system. Education was also controlled by the state. Literacy increased but indoctrination at the schools were carried out, raising a generation to look up to their leader, Stalin and the Father of the revolution Lenin. Slowly Russia was more and more controlled by the Bolsheviks and Stalin. He had control over his own party by eliminating eventual threats. He controlled the entire nation by propaganda and illusions. The illusion of a more democratic system was in fact only one more thing for Stalin to control. The free education was in fact only a school of indoctrination where the children were taught what Stalin decided. The many purges on Stalin's orders created fear and suspicion among the Russians. This way did Stalin have control over the people not only physically (education etc.) but also psychologically. People were constantly frightened that they would be next, or their son etc. This way they were probably more likely to stress their obedience to Stalin. Linda Eriksson History IB1 2003-11-28 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The causes of the show trials and purges of the 1930’s

    profession in Russia.54 The accused were charged with espionage, terrorism and establishing a ring of organized crime in the Soviet Union, led internationally by Trotsky.55 There were additional charges laid on Bukharin for conspiring to murder Lenin, Stalin and Sverdlov in 1919, and Yagoda for organizing the murder of his

  2. .Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin and Stalin had many ...

    It was vital to increase the food supplies to workers in the towns and cities or the Five-Year Plans wouldn't succeed. Small-scale peasant farming was inefficient. Stalin forced peasants to collectivise (land was pooled together). The peasants resisted this change, so Stalin decided to use force.

  1. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    Not only did he murder more people than any of the others, but lived to be seventy-three, dying in 1953. By Lauren Simpson Who do you think had more impact in Russian history, Lenin or Stalin? After studying the life, beliefs and impact of Lenin and Stalin I have come

  2. How did Stalin Rise to Power between 1922 – 1929?

    While Zinoviev and Kamenev agreed with Trotsky's views on the economy, they disliked him as a person. He was clever, energetic and original. He was popular among ordinary Party members and the army. But he was also vain and arrogant.

  1. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    a measure of economic liberalisation were implemented otherwise known as the NEP. In contrast, things became even worse for the workers under the NEP; some had called it the 'New Exploitation of the Proletariat'.30 They were less happy than the peasants due to a steep rise in unemployment in its first two years.

  2. To what extent were the Stalinist purges simply a way of eliminating his rivals?

    only to Party Leaders and a few educated Russians, Stalin would have found such a man to be a threat, and took advantage of his traits to carry on such a vicious campaign, which resulted in the exile, and later murder, of Leon Trotsky.

  1. Links between the two regimes of Lenin and Stalin.

    is an eventual socialist goal, and that the kulaks are "bloodsuckers, vampires, robbers of the people"11, Stalin's theory that his policy would lead "to the destruction of the last roots of capitalism in the country, to the final victory of socialism in agriculture, and to the complete consolidation of Soviet power in the countryside"12 is fantastical.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    acts and organizations.[36] The newly drafted decree stated, "1 - The investigating authorities are instructed to expedite cases of those accused of planning or carrying out terrorist acts. 2 - Judicial bodies are instructed not to delay carrying out death sentences involved in crimes of this category on the assumption

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work