• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What measures did Stalin take to maintain power?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What measures did Stalin take to maintain power? After Lenin's death in 1924 the Bolshevik Politburo decided to rule Russia together. However, the rivalry among them started quickly as some of them, truly, wanted to be Lenin's successor. The two main rivals were Trotsky and Stalin, both members of the Politburo, the top section within the party. However, looking back from today we can see that Trotsky never really opposed a real threat to Stalin who would become the new leader of Russia officially in 1929. In this essay I will explain why Stalin became the new communist leader and examine what measures ho took to maintain his power after he successfully had won over both Trotsky, the right group of the party and the left group. When Lenin died in 1924 Stalin had all ready built up a network of supporters. In 1922 Stalin had been given the position as General Secretary of the Bolshevik party. It was a very powerful position but it had merely been realised by anyone but Stalin himself. He could view important documents and he could appoint new party workers/members as well as dismiss them. Silently but effectively Stalin began to organise his network - his supporters were given key positions within the party, while people who opposed Stalin or Stalin opposed/disliked were positioned in distant areas of Russia. ...read more.

Middle

The fact that he hadn't joined the party until after the 1917 rebellions irritated many of the "Old-Bolsheviks" that had been members since the creation of the party. Trotsky was also a very intelligent man (Stalin was probably too, but did not show it as Trotsky did) and that worked against him. Lenin described him as the "most capable man in the present Central Committee" (extract from Lenin's testament, 25th December 1922). Trotsky's competence mounted the dislike for him and lead to men within the party working together and doing anything to prevent him from gaining power, such as voting for Stalin instead. However, Stalin strategically betrayed all these men that he had co-operated with. The right - Bukharin, Rykov and Tomsky, and the left - Trotsky, Kamenev and Zinoview. They were all removed at an early stage in Stalin's USSR. He used his position as General Secretary to dismiss them from the party or to reposition them. Stalin had also introduced a system of threat of expulsion. Workers within the party had to have Party cards. If you lost your party card you could not participate in any Bolshevik activities and you could not get food stamps, jobs or housing etc. When somebody in the party was to be removed he would be asked for his card. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin also introduced a new constitution in 1936 that would appear to be more democratic by allowing voting by secret ballot. Everyone in Russia could vote for members to the national assembly, the Supreme Soviet. However, the Supreme Soviet did not have much power. It elected ministers to the Praesidium to act on its behalf and Stalin was also the secretary of it, thus he controlled the Praesidium too but at the same time it looked as if he had introduced a more democratic system. Education was also controlled by the state. Literacy increased but indoctrination at the schools were carried out, raising a generation to look up to their leader, Stalin and the Father of the revolution Lenin. Slowly Russia was more and more controlled by the Bolsheviks and Stalin. He had control over his own party by eliminating eventual threats. He controlled the entire nation by propaganda and illusions. The illusion of a more democratic system was in fact only one more thing for Stalin to control. The free education was in fact only a school of indoctrination where the children were taught what Stalin decided. The many purges on Stalin's orders created fear and suspicion among the Russians. This way did Stalin have control over the people not only physically (education etc.) but also psychologically. People were constantly frightened that they would be next, or their son etc. This way they were probably more likely to stress their obedience to Stalin. Linda Eriksson History IB1 2003-11-28 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The causes of the show trials and purges of the 1930’s

    profession in Russia.54 The accused were charged with espionage, terrorism and establishing a ring of organized crime in the Soviet Union, led internationally by Trotsky.55 There were additional charges laid on Bukharin for conspiring to murder Lenin, Stalin and Sverdlov in 1919, and Yagoda for organizing the murder of his

  2. What methods were used by the Bolsheviks to maintain their power to 1924? How ...

    mistrust among the parties leaders and certainly wouldn't help them to maintain their position. Unsurprisingly, opposition to the Bolshevik ruling developed and this progressed into the Civil war. Although the civil war wasn't strictly a method the Bolsheviks used, triumph in the civil war helped to consolidate the Bolsheviks power

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    His loyalty was, moreover, to Lenin and not to the abstract entity known as the Bolshevik Party. Had Lenin not returned from Zurich and had Stalin, Kamenev and Muranov kept the party on its conciliationist path, there is an excellent chance that Sverdlov would have directed his formidable talents towards some other internationalist and pro-Soviet organization.

  2. To what extent were the Stalinist purges simply a way of eliminating his rivals?

    which [the Bolsheviks] had picked up in the long and obscure inner Party struggles in which he had tried to operate as a conciliator."4 If this is indeed true, then Trotsky would not appear to be the conspirator that Stalin preferred to describe him as.

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    the importance of the issue, however these articles were generally longer and were directly in the middle of the front page. Although the articles were very long, there was no real commentary on the events, only reporting. The only commentary was in a letter to the editor.

  2. How did Stalin Rise to Power between 1922 – 1929?

    the party's Political Bureau, or ' Politburo' for short - said that they would operate a system of Collective Leadership between themselves. Stalin, however, had no intention of becoming part of a system of collective leadership. Even before Lenin died in 1924, Stalin had set about the task of winning power for himself.

  1. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    Internal passports were introduced to prevent the workers from fleeing to the countryside. This control reached its zenith, according to E. Meshcherskaya, in 1933, with thousands denied passports.27 In order to quell the agitated spirits of the workers, the Bolsheviks became adept in the use of terror.

  2. .Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin and Stalin had many ...

    For example by 1939 approximately 3 million people were dead and 9 million were political prisoners through his orders. He masterminded the "Gulag" where millions would die in labour camps for trivial offences. His ruthlessness continued throughout the Second World War up until his death.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work