• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What part did Ronald Reagan play in bringing the Cold War to an end?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What part did Ronald Reagan play in bringing the Cold War to an end? The Cold War dominated international relations for almost half of the twentieth century and when it finally came to an end at the close of the 1980s the shock among contemporaries was considerable. The causes and reasons for the end of the Cold War are many and varied but the fact that Ronald Reagan was in the White House during the 1980s meant that he was heavily involved in the processes and decisions that brought about a conclusion to the Cold War. However, in order to determine what part Reagan played in bringing the Cold War to an end and assess the importance of this part one needs to consider all the other factors contributing to the end. Furthermore, as Oberdorfer writes, the end of the Cold War could be seen in terms of the great debate concerning the question, 'is history predominantly fashioned by the human will of extraordinary people or is it largely determined by external forces more powerful than the individual actors?'1 Therefore did the Cold War come about due to structural changes or did individual agents bring about the end? This is an important point to consider when assessing Reagan's part in the end but I think that it is more a combination of structural and agential factors that brought about the end. To look at Reagan's role I will look at his policies in his first and then second terms, and the changes that occurred that led to the end of the Cold War. ...read more.

Middle

the Soviet Union was, 'at a peak in its fortunes,' and the United States at a trough in its fortunes.19 In the early 1980s the Soviet Union was in decline with a stalemate in Afghanistan, internal problems in Poland with the emergence of Solidarity and such like, ineffectiveness when dealing with the Middle East, stagnation in the economy, and it had become too entangled in the problems of the Third World.20 Along with these problems the Soviet leadership was very weak with the consecutive deaths of Brezhnev, Andropov and Chernenko all in relatively short period while at the same time strong western leaders were in place in the form of Reagan, Thatcher, Mitterand and Kohl. Consequently attempts at diplomacy and talks on arms reductions did not get very far, and it was not until 1985 that the right combination of, 'a politically strong United States' president and a physically strong Soviet general secretary,' were in office simultaneously to enable the Cold War to move forward.21 Therefore conditions were right for a move towards greater arms control and an improvement in American - Soviet relations. It was Gorbachev who took the initiative because he had to do something in order to get the Soviet Union out of the downward spiral that it was in. On becoming general secretary Gorbachev's main aim was to stabilise and expand the ailing Soviet economy in order to try to maintain the Soviet Union's status as a superpower, and he announced his policy Perestroika, which was meant to restructure the economy.22 To this objective of economic reform all his other policies and actions were linked. ...read more.

Conclusion

Gorbachev was aware of this and he did not resist the cries for independence and freedom that were echoing from Eastern Europe partly in the hope that the world would see the Soviet Union as becoming more tolerant and democratic. However these changes in global structures were underlying trends and the Soviet Foreign Minister Bessmertnykh said that the improvement in relations between the United States and the Soviet Union was, 'a rare case in history when a major change did not just develop - it was willed to happen.'36 It was Reagan and Gorbachev that acknowledged the change in global trends and structures and then went about trying to use those changes to bring the Cold War to an end. By the time George Bush Snr. was sworn in as president in January 1989 it appeared that the prospect of an actual nuclear holocaust was more remote than at any other time since the beginning of the Cold War rivalry of the superpowers.37 Later that same year the Berlin Wall was torn down and just two years after that the whole of the Soviet Union collapsed. Ronald Reagan played a key role in contributing to these events with his early military expansion putting further pressure on an already strained Soviet economy. Then, when the time was right, Reagan made great progress, along with Gorbachev, on arms reductions and improving American-Soviet relations to enable them to bring about an end to a confrontation that was no longer benefiting either side in an ever increasing globalised world. Therefore the issue that George Bush had to deal with in 1989 was not how he should fight the Cold War but instead decide whether the Cold War was over. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. What were the Main Causes of the Cold War? and Which of these Causes ...

    As Stalin said and believed, "The development of world capitalism proceeds not in the path of smooth and even progress but through the crises and the catastrophes of war." Time magazine said that it was the most war-like pronouncement uttered by any top-rank statesman since V-J Day and therefore this can be seen as a cause of the Cold War.

  2. Who was responsible for the start of the Cold war?

    Further more the Berlin Wall marked the end of Soviet incursion into Europe 'freezing the geographical status quo.' It was now most certainly East versus West. Tensions between the two superpowers were now at an all time height; yet it is true to say that at this stage the Americans

  1. Japan: Post-Occupation Era 1952-80

    in extending influence to the Arabian Sea???? and Persian Gulf???, as William E. Griffith points out. g. In 1964 Japan became a member of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development ???????? (OECD). She is the only non-western member of economically advanced nations. In the same year the Olympics was held in Tokyo.

  2. The Cold War 1980-1990 (The Roles of Reagan and Gorbachev)

    3) The USA threatened to develop SDI in the 1980s because there was heightened tension between the USA and the Soviet Union.

  1. When and Why Did the Cold War Start? Was any Individual or Power the ...

    We will be merciless toward the Germans, but our allies will seek to treat them more leniently'. . [Leffler, M. 'Origins of the Cold War 2nd ed' 2005] The type of passionate language used here does perhaps reinforce Gaddis's view that Stalin was rather zealous and perhaps slightly paranoid.

  2. The emergence of the Superpowers 1945-1962

    He didn't have a great deal of knowledge of International affairs but became President when Roosevelt unexpectedly died. He demanded nuclear weapons be used against Japan in 1945 showing that he was not going to take any nonsense. Remained President until 1952, shows the public must have like him.

  1. Superpower Relations and the Thaw in the Cold War

    Death of Stalin * Stalin was perceived in the West as the dominant factor in the development of the Cold War * Liberal Historians who have emphasised the role of personality have seen Stalin?s death as the determining factor in the development of the ?thaw?.

  2. The aim of this essay is to evaluate if the end of the Cold ...

    explaining events such as the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the Berlin Wall fall, their theory is able to explain these event (Blair et al, 2009 p.21-22). Between the years 1947 -1991, the world experienced the struggle by two fundamental opposing systems; the socialist communism and liberal democracy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work