• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What Was The Main Cause Of The First English Civil War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What Was The Main Cause Of The English Civil War? [1642-1646] The first English Civil War took place between parliamentarians and royalists over the course of four years, from 1642 to 1646. It consisted of much political conspiracy and armed contention from both sides who had encountered great difficulty in co-operating during the flawed reign of Charles I. The war was a result of parliament's general frustration at the monarch's policies, and the influence of the conflicts in Ireland and Scotland. Parliament's ultimate aim was not to dispose of Charles I from the throne, but to pressurize and obligate the King to abide by the policies in which they desire the country to be run. Supporters of Charles were to battle against parliament, and so began the events of the civil war. This essay will consider the causes of the civil war through events preceding 1642 from a series of different aspects. Social, political, economic, religious and military accounts will be excogitated and I will venture to find a conclusion to what I believe was the most notable in motivating the war. Charles I was a highly introverted character during his time as King of England and Scotland. He did not enjoy speaking or having any satisfactory form of communication to the public that he ruled over, and suffered from poor social skills. As a supporter of Arminianism, he abided by the divine right of kings, allowing him to remain silent in times of public commotion. ...read more.

Middle

People with property within limits of the boundaries of the Royal forests during Edward I's reign were fined for encroachment, and the Court of Wards was exploited so that the King became an acting guardian to the children of rich parents who had passed away, profiting by selling the estates that those children would have acquired through inheritance. Also during the Personal Rule, Charles' foreign policy revolved around isolating England from any non-domestic conflict. This, of course, compensated for the lack of funds - as did the avoidance of any major innovations in the country's communities. People were upset with the lack of advances at the time and this represents another reason as to why many people felt disgruntled under Charles' reign. Another factor that enraged the public was Charles' lifestyle and expensive taste. He held a firm interest in art and culture and purchased many paintings and portraits from established artists, such as Raphael and Titian (his collection of art was later dispersed by Oliver Cromwell). They felt that because they had limited resources on which to survive at this time, it was unfair of the King to spend abnormally high amounts of money on products that he could have easily survived without. Charles' lifestyle was reflected in his religious practice. Whereas Protestants favoured a plainer approach towards worship and their churches, the King was far more elaborate in these issues, enjoying a high Anglican form of worship which was deeply ritualistic and extensively decorated. ...read more.

Conclusion

to work around as the dissolution of Parliament was a central issue, and the lack of funds meant the King had to increase revenue by introducing taxes, such as the notorious ship money - an economic decision which enraged the public, as did many others. On a par with the importance of these social and economic expressions were that of military events, and the restriction of the power to control armies by Parliament, and the Irish Rebellion. However, I believe that religious issues were of a much more important nature. It is evident that there was a massive divide in the beliefs of the country, and as people are passionate about their beliefs, they will stand up to what they see as true and would be enraged if their reckonings were to be challenged, let alone deal with the abrupt imposition of something completely different (the enforcement of the Common Book of Prayer in Scotland, c. 1637). In conclusion, and in spite of the importance of religion during these times, my opinion is that the political causes outweigh all else, in particular the intrusions on Charles' policies by the John Pym-led Long Parliament in 1641. The Grand Remonstrance was a direct attack on the King, as were a series of other statements issued - and, as a monarch, Charles' only option was to enter into war to quell the threat that Parliament pressured, as life alongside it had become intolerable while having the majority of his power limited considerably and his reputation tarnished. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why did King Charles I Resort to Personal Rule in 1629?

    Parliament, of course, protested, but Charles dissolved it anyway. This is symbolic of Charles' lack of willingness to compromise at all with Parliament. Dissolving Parliament did not solve the problem of the money he needed. He therefore devised another way of getting the money. Charles realised the backlash he would receive if he attempted to force the money out of peoples' pockets.

  2. Henry II (1154 - 1189) is generally seen as the main catalyst in the ...

    Although in matters requiring a serious enforcement for crimes Henry developed the 'Council of Northampton in 1176 as a means to clamp down upon serious offenders.'66 This reform refers to any convicted persons having been found guilty of their crime could effectively lose their limbs, as well as introducing and firmly establishing Royal justices.

  1. Was Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain?

    He closed theatres and banned Christmas and Easter. This shows us that, he wants his people to follow his view but in a very different and commanding way. Theatres were closed because Puritans said the devil used them. Dancing around May Poles was banned.

  2. What was the most significant cause of civil strife in England from 1455-61?

    The removal of these nobles was one of the demands of Jack Cade's 1450 rebellion, proof that this was a contentious issue amongst the public. Although this was undeniably a contributing factor to the outbreak of civil strife, the stronger argument is that it was not the creation of these

  1. Arabi israli conflict

    Jerusalem is preventing a problem to a peaceful revolution because religiously it means a lot to both sides and it's a Major city. I think that the most important problem causing this conflict is the land itself. To me it seems like all the other issues like religion, the role of other countries e.c.t all link back to land.

  2. The roles and leadership of Charles Stuart and John Pym in the English Civil ...

    His followers, the Royalists, were made up of many of the gentry as Thomas Stephens, the sheriff of Gloucestershire in 1445 conceded that "almost all the gentry were ever for the King"4. Charles also had the support of foreign rulers that he was related to who lent their aid by supplying his army with cavalry.

  1. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    attempt by the French monarchy to obliterate any association with a possible heretic out of political necessity, rather than to let the truth be known about their heroine.40 When Joan was captured, at Compiegne, no effort was made by the French king to ransom her.

  2. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    All together this gives evidence to suggest that Henry?s intuition caused problems in creating difficulties for his reign. By the years of 1545 and 1546 the king?s worsening health made him less ambitious in military actions forcing him to conduct peace talks with both Scotland and France.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work