• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What was the most significant cause of civil strife in England from 1455-61?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Tom Bish What was the most significant cause of civil strife in England from 1455-61? At the battle of Towton in 1461 Henry VI was captured and deposed by his cousin Edward, leaving behind a legacy of incessant failures, incompetence and inadequacy. There are numerous causes for this, both long and short term including Henry's leadership and personality, the role of Margaret of Anjou, the actions of Richard Duke of York as well as the increased power of the nobility and the perversion of the feudal system. These are all evidently contingent factors of civil strife in England but one in particular stands out as crucial to the outbreak of extensive discord in a nation which had been left stable, united and celebrating military successes in France by Henry V. This remarkable deterioration saw the English monarchy go from being responsible for a great victory at Agincourt and having the thrones of itself and France united, to being a powerless bystander overseeing a nation embroiled in acute dissension in just eighteen years. Only one factor can be called the most significant in relation to the causes behind civil strife, and this was Henry VI himself. However this does not mean that other factors did not contribute to the breakdown of law and order. The most long-term was the underlying issue of the increase in power of the nobility, and the origin of this can be traced back to the reign of Edward III in the 1300s. Edward was renowned for his military prowess and was able to contain the energies of the nobility - something Henry failed to do - by channelling them into successful campaigns in both France and Scotland. After making much use of his nobles in these military victories he was compelled to make certain concessions in return, as thanks, which gave them increased power and status in the legal system for example. ...read more.

Middle

In full awareness of York's ongoing quarrel with John Beaufort, Duke of Somerset, Henry awarded the latter the government of Gascony and the title captain-general of the region. York could have only seen this as an emasculation of his authority. He may have also become alarmed at the rate at which a William de la Pole, Earl of Suffolk, led faction was monopolising patronage and power. As Ralph Griffiths put it, "Henry was enveloped by an impenetrable, self-perpetuating oligarchy" that "isolated him from alternative sources of counsel". This led to Edmund Beaufort replacing Richard of York in France and York being reappointed lieutenant of Ireland in 1447. This simultaneously demonstrates yet another personal failing of Henry VI but also provides a satisfactory explanation for York's insubordination. Warren states that Richard "rightly assumed that this was to get him out of the way" and for a man who became heir presumptive after Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester's death in 1447 this must have been incredibly infuriating. Despite this, there is still no evidence that Richard sought to depose Henry but it may be the threat to his status of heir presumptive that triggered his return from Ireland in 1450 as Henry was still childless and Suffolk arranged for his son to marry a Beaufort heiress seeing as the Beauforts had royal blood. Some may argue that his return from Ireland without permission was a sign of treason and subversion which appears a reasonable point of view seeing as the 1450 Cade's rebellion had failed and Beaufort had lost Normandy yet still remained in the Kings favour. In spite of this however, it appears that York merely wished the recognition of his status as heir apparent and the removal of Somerset. There is clear evidence for the aforementioned wish for recognition at the 1451 parliament where Thomas Yonge proposed it to the Commons on behalf of York. ...read more.

Conclusion

With the depletion of his resources saw a diminution in his annual income and to solve this he borrowed from his magnates, putting him further under their influence. His actions in France such as the previously explored snub of Richard of York in 1443 and his injudicious desire for peace certainly were factors. The secret cession of Maine to Charles VI and repeated losses on the battlefield such as the loss of Normandy publicised the fact that he was a poor leader of men as well as highlighting the huge contrast between his insufficient military tactics and those of his father Henry V who experienced so much success. Some may use the Polydore Virgil quote which describes Henry as a "pure, honest and holy creature" to defend Henry's weaknesses but that merely corroborates what has been argued against him. The country needed a strong and decisive leader but Henry failed to show any of the necessary qualities of a king and his mental breakdown allowed the York-Anjou conflict to infiltrate factions nationwide, effectively dividing the country in two. There is no doubt that Henry was faced with tough challenges when he reached the end of his minority, his father's untimely death meant he had to deal with home and foreign affairs from an early age but if his inheritance could survive the 15 year minority, why could it not be sustained after? Henry completely failed to deal with the issues that were facing him unlike Edward IV and Henry VII who were both able to secure their positions in the years after Henry's usurpation. The long term, underlying causes can be dismissed as minor, relatively insignificant factors that Henry simply lacked the ability to deal with and his capitulation was guaranteed even before his mental breakdown as his entire personality was the contrary of what was needed. Richard of York and Margaret of Anjou may have exacerbated and accelerated pre-existing problems but it boils down to the fact that Henry was a weak, inept King who allowed his generosity to spiral out of control and failed to recognise the implications of his actions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Henry VI's weakness as a King Directly Led to the outbreak of war in ...

    dangerous, this is summed up by McFarlane, "Only a undermighty ruler had anything to fear from over mighty subjects". Finally to add to the weakness of Henry VI, he had a mental collapse in the form of catatonic schizophrenia, effectively leaving him unable to speak, let alone rule a country.

  2. TO WHAT EXTENT WAS HENRY VI'S INCOMPETENCE THE PRIMARY CAUSE FOR THE OUTBREAK OF ...

    dubious claim to the throne. This made a Lancastrian king vulnerable to attack. Henry's lack of such a strength not only strengthened the power of other claimants but also encouraged people to question his right to be king. The king's inauthoritative presence produced a lack of confidence in a King of so little strength amongst his people.

  1. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    This can be attributed Alexander?s other real motives, and the fact that although he appeared to be more reforming than his father, he still lacked the courage to risk political loss of support in order to press for further reforms for the good of the country.

  2. Henry II (1154 - 1189) is generally seen as the main catalyst in the ...

    of his own power'.44 This referencing demonstrates again Henry II brilliance for establishing reforms as being yet another example whereby he further weakened the traditional feudal ties in strategically superior manner because Henry knew that by strengthening his position he could then implement and formalise the jurisdiction of the 'General

  1. What Was The Main Cause Of The First English Civil War?

    input from any area and this not only isolated many politicians but also this "creative reform" (as referred to by recent historians such as Kevin Sharpe) brought about many mistakes and dubious decision making. One of the most notable was being drawn into war in Scotland - Presbyterians had viciously

  2. How stable was the government of England during the reign of Richard III?

    of nobles was evident as many of them were on the council during Edward IV's reign. They were mostly Southerners and had seen the way Richard had killed many of his opponents. Lord Ryvvers for example, was Elizabeth Woodville's son from her first marriage.

  1. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    The Conservative Party Reaction * The Conservative party, accepting that female enfranchisement was now inevitable, appreciated the advantages of limiting the franchise to the over 30s. (Change in order to conserve).

  2. Within the context of the period 1337-1471, to what extent can Henry VI be ...

    At this point, Henry VI did seem to act of his own accord, as the fact that he made the deal a secret suggest that he knew that many people would disapprove of his actions. All this suggests that Henry was fully in charge of the government and its decisions,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work