• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What was the short term significance of Martin Luther King after the March on Washington?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐What was the short-term significance of martin Luther King after the march on Washington? On the 27th of august 1963, the March on Washington took place; its main purpose was to raise awareness of jobs and treatment of African Americans during the 1960s in particular. The event was officially called ?The march on Washington for jobs and freedom?, involved where the six biggest civil rights groups [1]. The march led 250,000 campaigners through the capital and to the Lincoln Memorial, where Martin Luther King (MLK) performed his iconic ?I have a dream speech?. This quickly became one of the most iconic moments in history, particularly during the civil rights movement. This reputation was helped by the march being the largest political rally in the history of the United States, further giving the march, and those speaking including king more influence on the treatment of black Americans for the rest of the twentieth century. In particular, Martin Luther King?s words energized the fight for equality. He was one of the most established freedom fighters during this time, looking for integration into a predominantly white driven American society. Furthermore he was helped by the work of his own group called the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) [2]. However, others accommodate the opinion that Kings short-term influence was minimal, and he in fact did nothing to help the treatment of African Americans twenty years after his speech at the march on Washington. I believe that the most compelling argument that can be made for the short-term influence of MLK is the passing of the civil rights bill of 1964. ...read more.

Middle

They achieved the result that they ultimately where aiming for just as they did in Washington which demonstrates the effect that King had on changing rules around the north of America as well as the south. This source is reliable as it is stating facts of the event. It talks of how a once segregated organization had now become desegregated as a result, and therefore holds a great way in helping to make the judgement on whether or not king had short-term significance, in this case it shows how he did to a great extent. In contrast to this view, it can be said that King didn?t have a great significance after the march on Washington because, despite the influences that he had on changing laws, there were still great economic difficulties for Black Americans. Even King himself acknowledged that he had not changed anything about economic problems. Evidence can be found after the march in Watts, a friend of his called Bayard Rustin writes about what King said to him, ??you know Bayard, I worked hard to get these people the right to eat hamburgers, now I?ve got to do something? to help them get the money to buy it.?? This highlights the main problem that King himself could not overcome. His march on Washington won them equal rights in work and employment however it couldn?t do anything about the unequal pay that Black Americans received. This became a big problem to him, as without money, what he had done for African Americans did not have as big a significance as it could have and meant that discrimination was still very much an issue. ...read more.

Conclusion

This source is from an article written by someone that sympathises with king greatly as he goes onto say, ??If this was manhood, I was in no hurry to join them.?? This shows that he still had significance ad influence on views of people from the racist areas, as this person disagreed with those that opposed MLKs visit. In conclusion, I believe that King had a great deal of short-term significance after his march on Washington. The most compelling bit of evidence that points to this view is the impact he had on passing the civil rights bill of 1964. The nationwide impact was made clear after his death, when in a speech Robert Kennedy said, ?? Or we can make an effort, as Martin Luther King did, to understand and to comprehend, and to replace that violence, that stain of bloodshed that has spread across our land, with an effort to understand with compassion and love??[8]. This underlines the significance of King as such a well renowned figure was encouraging the country to follow in his footsteps, which could be said, is the reason why even more was achieved after his death. As well as the civil rights bill, he also changed the attitudes of some people, which in turn gave him, and the movement more support in order to go on and fight for equality. Therefore, it is impossible to say he had nothing but an incredible influential and significant legacy after the march, which paved the way for future movements and laws to be established. [1]. http://www.infoplease.com/spot/marchonwashington.html [2]. http://www.britannica.com/biography/Martin-Luther-King-Jr [3]. http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/civil-rights-act/ [4]. http://www.britannica.com/event/United-States-presidential-election-of-1964 [5]. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/chi-chicagodays-martinlutherking-story-story.html [6]. https://www.doi.gov/pmb/eeo/AA-HM [7]. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/1/17/1270338/-Chicago-Summers-1966-67-Grown-Wary-and-Weary-of-Racism [8]. http://www.powerfulwords.info/speeches/John_F_Kennedy/8.htm ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    To what extent were Malcolm X and the subsequent Black Power Movement the 'Evil ...

    4 star(s)

    1997 20 Civil Rights in the USA, 1863-1980 p.290 - Paterson et al. 2001 21 The New Negro in the North - Kenneth Clarke, 1961 22 An African American Civil Rights organisation founded in 1966 by Huey Newton and Bobby Seale that gradually dissolved and is no longer officially active.

  2. Linguistic Study - Linguistic Analysis of Martin Luther King's 'I Have a Dream', and ...

    Abraham Lincoln was the 16th President of the United States. As a supporter of equal rights, he introduced measures that resulted in the eradication of slavery, signing the Emancipation Proclamation in 1963. Lincoln is remembered as a great leader of the United States, and was victorious in the American Civil War.

  1. Assess the short term significance of Thurgood Marshall in helping Black Americans gain improved ...

    Source 6 provides evidence of Chief Justice Earl Warren's significance, as three of his colleagues state their beliefs that Warren was the main reason the Brown case succeeded. In the letter Warren's colleagues state that "Warren must take the credit" for the Brown victory, with no mention of Marshall, suggesting

  2. Revision notes - the USA 1945 to 1980

    Education He also increased funding for universities, which helped the middle class. But he also passed the Elementary and Secondary Education act in 1965 which put money into education in poor areas. For the first time large amounts of money went to state schools.

  1. Compare the contributions of Martin Luther King and Lyndon B Johnson to the gaining ...

    The SCLC was committed to the use of non-violence and its motto was "Not one hair of one head of one person should be harmed." The importance of the SCLC's involvement was simply because the churches that represented the black population in the South were potent organisations.

  2. How far was Martin Luther King's leadership responsible for the gains made by the ...

    This is shown through the obstruction of civil rights legislation from 1945 through to 1960. However, we notice that Congress?s attitude towards civil rights legislation had changed. In 1964, 73 out of 100 senators and 289 of the 435 members of the House of Representatives voted in favour for the Civil Rights Act.

  1. What was the short term impact of the Montgomery Bus Boycott 1955-1957?

    Furthermore, the violence that the black Americans experienced during and after the Bus Boycott was vast. King?s house was bombed in January 1956, when this happened it affected the ?whole black community? (9) this would have intimidated the African American?s, as it would have made them feel unsafe in their own homes.

  2. Comparing and Contrasting The Lives Of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. And Malcolm X

    He spent his time in jail educating himself and learning more about the black Muslims, who advocated racial separation. In 1952 he was released and he joined a Black Muslim temple in Detroit and became the most prominent spokesperson for the Nation of Islam by the early 1960's.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work