• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What was the short term significance of the Treaty of Versailles on the emergence of political parties from 1919-1920?

Extracts from this document...


What was the short term significance of the Treaty of Versailles on the emergence of political parties from 1919-1920? The Treaty of Versailles (ToV) was signed in 1919, marking a monumental shift in both society and politics against the backdrop of intense public dissatisfaction, something which all the contempory sources agree on, despite disagreeing on the degree to which society was affected. The ToV initially united society in its rejection and protest of the treaty. This can be seen in a photo taken in 1919, showing this unity through the sheer volume of people and class, as the bowler hats of the upper class and flat caps of the lower freely mix, highlighting how this issue erased ingrained social boundaries. As a primary source photo, we can rely on it to give an accurate and unbiased view, however that view is limited to that particular moment in time. It was published in a British newspaper and from this we can infer its purpose; to inform the British public of the German sentiment and to show the treaty was harsh on Germany, although its author is unknown, given the British sentiment at the time, we can assume this was published in a liberal newspaper and aimed at those who sympathised with Germany. ...read more.


in the war had little scruples in killing communists as shown in the source; a photo from the revolution, in which it is clear these men are not Reichswehr due to their uniform, but rather Freikorps quelling communists, showing their free rein. They suffered one major problem. They lacked support from ordinary Germans, and this is seen in the parties voted for in the 1919 elections, all of which favoured democracy, a fatal weakness in 1920 during the Kapp Putsch that failed due to this lack of support because of a general strike as "they simply wanted no more trouble in their capital after experiencing the Communist rebellion in 1919."4 The reaction of Berliners showed the centrist belief within society and how extremists would not be tolerated after suffering so much at their hands. Thus, the Freikorps ceased to exist, not due to any governmental action, but due to the actions of society. However it is important to consider that by the very nature of this source, it can only show one particular moment in time, from one specific angle, and so we are limited in what we can learn from the source apart from learning the freikorps were ex-soldiers who were fighting the communists. ...read more.


It did not pacify Germany, still less permanently weaken her, appearances notwithstanding, but left here scourged, humiliated and resentful."5 Whilst Lentin outwardly disagrees with Weinberg and Barnett, he does agree that Germany was weakened and could still rise. Thus showing that whilst the source depicting German distitution can be relied upon to show how German life was, we cannot completely rely upon it to be honest as historians show life was not as bad as was made out. As such, the ToV had a huge impact upon Germany and split society down ideological lines with the extreme factions causing much destruction and suffering in the short time they existed. However it is clear that in 1919-1920, society as a whole suffered greatly and there was great discontent. However its most significant impact was not the destruction or poverty it caused, but the resentment and hatred for the treaty, which became the catalyst for WWII. 1 Dr. E J Feuchtwanger- New perspective, Vol. 1 No. 1...September 1995 2 David Andelman- A shattered Peace, Wiley and Sons, 2007 3 Gordon Williamson, The SS, Hitler's instrument of Terror, Zenith Press, 1994 4 http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/kapp_putsch.htm 5 A. Lentin, Guilt at Versailles, Methuen, 1985 ?? ?? ?? ?? 1510 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How accurate is it to suggest that the Treaty of Versailles was mainly responsible ...

    of 1919-23 as it became associated with the Weimar government - a government that was hated by the very people is sought to represent. In addition, a dramatic rise in the opposition to the Weimar government in the years 1919-23 played a significant role in creating political and economic instability at this time.

  2. Versailles Treaty- evaluation of sources

    to mind its role in creating the disorder which made conflict possible. Interpretation A accepts that Germany was facing many changes all on the judgement of Versailles which destroyed the "German pride and made Germany the pariah of Europe". In this light, these historians present the view that Versailles did

  1. Why was public opinion so outraged by the Treaty of Versailles?

    The Allied powers had previously sought to empower the population of defeated countries by allowing them to decide their fate however this choice was effectively denied to the one million Germans who now found themselves under Polish control and thus the victorious Allies were accused of hypocrisy.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    They system of small individual farms gave way for class divisions; collectivisation would bring the peasant much closer to socialism. The peasants could farm enough grain to feed the cities, the yield surplus workers and still have enough to export to generate capital for industries - if they were moved into mechanised agriculture.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    The Germans were politically inexperienced, and to many of them democracy seemed merely a sham anyway. A more authoritarian system, reminiscent of imperial Germany, was envisioned as Germany's salvation. In many ways, Weimar democracy ended in 1930 with the establishment of the presidential system.

  2. What in your view was the short term significance of the Decembrist Revolt?

    Further evidence of repression can be seen in the third section's treatment of "The Petrashevsky Circle" in 1849, who were arrested and accused of revolutionary conspiracy. It is arguable that, without the Decembrist revolt of 1825, the authorities would not have been as interested in the activities of this group,

  1. Assess the short-term significance of the Treaty of Versailles.

    For example; in 1922 Germany could not pay another instalment so France and Belgium invaded the Ruhr, the industrial heart of the German economy. This brought production to a halt. Consequently, this caused one of the worst cases of hyperinflation in history.

  2. What was the short term significance of Russias entry into World War One up ...

    This reliance can be explicitly seen in Source C, where the Tsarina is writing to the Tsar in response to his brother?s criticisms of the influence of Rasputin states that without Rasputin, ?all would have finished?. This reveals that it was the Tsarina?s believe that they would have already lost the war if not for Rasputin.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work