• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What were the common factors that led to the establishment of totalitarian regimes in Italy and Germany in the inter-war period? (1990)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What were the common factors that led to the establishment of totalitarian regimes in Italy and Germany in the inter-war period? (1990) Totalitarian regimes refer to the type of government in which the State has total control over all aspects of people's life. Main features include an infallible leader, planned economy, strict party discipline, strong armament, an official doctrine that everyone has to believe, and absolute obedience of individuals to the State, etc. During the period 1919-39 there saw the rise of totalitarian regimes in some European countries. The most important ones in Western Europe were Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. Their respective rise to power shared many similarities but there were some differences. The leaders of Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany were Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler respectively. The aftermath of the First World War provided both men with a hotbed to come to power. Both Italians and Germans were dismayed and annoyed with the Paris Peace Settlement. Italy joined the First World War in 1915 because the Allied Powers had promised her territorial gains. Premier Orlando joined the Paris Peace Conference as one of the "Big Four". ...read more.

Middle

By 1933 there were six million people unemployed. Germany lost all her overseas markets while Italy's gains in the war could not cover her losses. Both Italians and Germans were despaired; any leader who could achieve quick economic recovery would be certainly popular. The First World War witnessed the victory of the western democratic powers. Yet democracy failed to save the infant republics. The Weimar Republic was the most democratic form of government that Germany had ever had. Kaiser William II abdicated and fled, marking the end of the Hohenzollern empire. However, the party government was terribly inefficient. There were too many parties but none won absolute majority in the Reichstag. As the system of proportional representation was adopted, coalition cabinets were inevitable. Politicians were irresponsible while policies were inconsistent. They were incapable of solving the postwar difficulties. Though Italian politicians might be more experienced, they were corrupt and the frequent changes of coalition governments created similar problems as those of Germany. Efficient one-party rule became a good alternative to both dismayed Italians and Germans. ...read more.

Conclusion

Both had organized highly disciplined parties to spread activities and combat opponents. Both had appealing ideologies and supported an expansionist foreign policy. To Italians and Germans, both were strong leaders in sharp contrast to the weak parliamentary governments. However, there were some differences in the rise of the totalitarian regimes between Italy and Germany. First, Germany inherited Prussian authoritarianism; her democratic tradition was shallower than Italy's. In particular Hitler who had served in the army and promised a massive rearmament programme could get the Reichswehr goodwill. Germans who did not believe democracy supported Hitler's "action without thought" (A.J.P. Taylor) and "return to barbarism". (A. Lyttanson) Second, Mussolini came to power quickly after the First World War, whereas Hitler could not do so. His Munich Putsch failed in 1923. He could not realize his dream until Stresemann's death in 1929 and the occurrence of the Great Depression in 1929-33. Third, Mussolini rose to power with a coup d'etat by his March on Rome, while Hitler's Nazi Party had won almost absolute majority in the Reichstag with popular support and came to power constitutionally. In a nutshell, the various circumstances during the inter-war period did pave the way for the establishment of totalitarian regimes in Italy and Germany. 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    differences he believes that both careers fed off each other even though the two never met. The main differences he encounters are their personalities, Stalin was organised, a master of bureaucracy, sly and cunning with politics whereas Hitler was more charismatic, creative, he hated paper work and was unorganised.

  2. How totalitarian was fascist Italy?

    From 1924 onwards, the population as a whole was subject to control by the government through various channels. A secret police was created, OVRA, which was given wide powers. Their role was to eliminate "enemies" to the regime and regulate party members for Mussolini.

  1. Why did Mussolini's Fascist Party become popular in Italy after the First World War?

    His body was hung upside down in the street. To what extent had Mussolini achieved his ideal Fascist state by 1939 When Mussolini was appointed Prime Minister in 1922 he set out to achieve a Fascist state where he had supreme power.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    Yet nothing was left to chance on these occasions. Every device for heightening the emotional intensity, every trick of the theatre was used. The Nuremberg rallies held every year in September were masterpieces of theatrical art, with the most carefully devised effects.

  1. Vietnam war

    was forced off their land. USA's policy of depriving the BC of a recruiting base by Strategic hamlet construction, defoliation and the use of free-fire zones for massive firepower sent internal refugees crowding around bases and cities. * The slum shanties they built � no water, sewerage or electricity.

  2. Despite it all too obvious political and economic failings, in terms of its society ...

    Either judgment has been discredited amongst contemporary historians. In my opinion one issue that cannot be discredited, and has withstood much scrutiny over the years, is the lasting ideological and cultural legacy that Weimar Germany left behind. In terms of cultural initiative and diversity, the Weimar Republic was without doubt

  1. Unification of Germany and the period up to the second world war

    reparations and was not happy and lost Alsace and Lorraine too Imperial Germany and the Second Reich I. Intro * Satisfied people and proud in war, prussianisation of the Germans and not union of equals II. Organization of the new empire * Head was to be the Prussian ruler and

  2. Compare and contrast the situation in Italy 1919-22 with that in Germany 1919-29.

    Eventually, based on the Kings power, he installed Mussolini in the prime minister seat in 1922, as b this time Mussolini was being reputed as 'the person'. The march on Rome soon aft marked the fascist takeover of the Italian office.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work