• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What were the common factors that led to the establishment of totalitarian regimes in Italy and Germany in the inter-war period? (1990)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What were the common factors that led to the establishment of totalitarian regimes in Italy and Germany in the inter-war period? (1990) Totalitarian regimes refer to the type of government in which the State has total control over all aspects of people's life. Main features include an infallible leader, planned economy, strict party discipline, strong armament, an official doctrine that everyone has to believe, and absolute obedience of individuals to the State, etc. During the period 1919-39 there saw the rise of totalitarian regimes in some European countries. The most important ones in Western Europe were Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. Their respective rise to power shared many similarities but there were some differences. The leaders of Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany were Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler respectively. The aftermath of the First World War provided both men with a hotbed to come to power. Both Italians and Germans were dismayed and annoyed with the Paris Peace Settlement. Italy joined the First World War in 1915 because the Allied Powers had promised her territorial gains. Premier Orlando joined the Paris Peace Conference as one of the "Big Four". ...read more.

Middle

By 1933 there were six million people unemployed. Germany lost all her overseas markets while Italy's gains in the war could not cover her losses. Both Italians and Germans were despaired; any leader who could achieve quick economic recovery would be certainly popular. The First World War witnessed the victory of the western democratic powers. Yet democracy failed to save the infant republics. The Weimar Republic was the most democratic form of government that Germany had ever had. Kaiser William II abdicated and fled, marking the end of the Hohenzollern empire. However, the party government was terribly inefficient. There were too many parties but none won absolute majority in the Reichstag. As the system of proportional representation was adopted, coalition cabinets were inevitable. Politicians were irresponsible while policies were inconsistent. They were incapable of solving the postwar difficulties. Though Italian politicians might be more experienced, they were corrupt and the frequent changes of coalition governments created similar problems as those of Germany. Efficient one-party rule became a good alternative to both dismayed Italians and Germans. ...read more.

Conclusion

Both had organized highly disciplined parties to spread activities and combat opponents. Both had appealing ideologies and supported an expansionist foreign policy. To Italians and Germans, both were strong leaders in sharp contrast to the weak parliamentary governments. However, there were some differences in the rise of the totalitarian regimes between Italy and Germany. First, Germany inherited Prussian authoritarianism; her democratic tradition was shallower than Italy's. In particular Hitler who had served in the army and promised a massive rearmament programme could get the Reichswehr goodwill. Germans who did not believe democracy supported Hitler's "action without thought" (A.J.P. Taylor) and "return to barbarism". (A. Lyttanson) Second, Mussolini came to power quickly after the First World War, whereas Hitler could not do so. His Munich Putsch failed in 1923. He could not realize his dream until Stresemann's death in 1929 and the occurrence of the Great Depression in 1929-33. Third, Mussolini rose to power with a coup d'etat by his March on Rome, while Hitler's Nazi Party had won almost absolute majority in the Reichstag with popular support and came to power constitutionally. In a nutshell, the various circumstances during the inter-war period did pave the way for the establishment of totalitarian regimes in Italy and Germany. 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    differences he believes that both careers fed off each other even though the two never met. The main differences he encounters are their personalities, Stalin was organised, a master of bureaucracy, sly and cunning with politics whereas Hitler was more charismatic, creative, he hated paper work and was unorganised.

  2. Why did Mussolini's Fascist Party become popular in Italy after the First World War?

    Though maybe more importantly from Mussolini's outlook it was an apparent social and political experiment useful for bestowing respectability on his regime in the eyes of foreigners, and an elaborate concealment behind which corruption could flourish while Mussolini himself could pursue the very different goals which, by the 1930s, interested and became far more important to him.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    In making use of the formidable power which was thus placed in his hands Hitler had one supreme, and fortunately rare, advantage: he had neither scruples nor inhibition. He was a man without roots, with neither home nor family; a h who admitted no loyalties, was bound by no traditions, and felt respect neither for God nor man.

  2. Compare and contrast Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany as totalitarian states. (1996)

    The regimes were organized in a hierarchy and headed by these all-powerful leaders. Both Mussolini and Hitler were the personification of the State. By comparison, however, Hitler was more powerful as he was the supreme head of the State. After the death of President Hindenburg in 1934, Hitler merged Presidency and Chancellorship, and inherited the position of Commander-in-Chief.

  1. How totalitarian was fascist Italy?

    From 1924 onwards, the population as a whole was subject to control by the government through various channels. A secret police was created, OVRA, which was given wide powers. Their role was to eliminate "enemies" to the regime and regulate party members for Mussolini.

  2. Vietnam war

    Food rationing became necessary. * Decline of Urban population to 11%. * Decentralisation and regionalisation were the policies for industry. Five Year Plans were suspended and annual economic plans were made for the war effort 1965-75. Although state industry declined, provincial industry increased by two-thirds.

  1. To what extent were the German and Italian regimes under Hitler and Mussolini Totalitarian?

    iii. Define Totalitarian a. Totalitarian is defined as of or relating to centralized control by an autocratic leader or hierarchy. Of or relating to a political regime based on subordination of the individual to the state and strict control of all aspects of the life and productive capacity of the nation especially by coercive measures (as censorship and terrorism)3 iv.

  2. Compare and contrast the situation in Italy 1919-22 with that in Germany 1919-29.

    On the other hand, when analyzing the German Weimar republic post-war two periods have to be recognized, the pre-Stresemann period (1919-23) and the post-Stresemann period (1923-1929). In the pre-Stresemann era The faces of the angered, frustrated, humiliated people of Germany meant that the Kaiser William the 11 had to be

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work