• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What were the common factors that led to the establishment of totalitarian regimes in Italy and Germany in the inter-war period? (1990)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What were the common factors that led to the establishment of totalitarian regimes in Italy and Germany in the inter-war period? (1990) Totalitarian regimes refer to the type of government in which the State has total control over all aspects of people's life. Main features include an infallible leader, planned economy, strict party discipline, strong armament, an official doctrine that everyone has to believe, and absolute obedience of individuals to the State, etc. During the period 1919-39 there saw the rise of totalitarian regimes in some European countries. The most important ones in Western Europe were Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. Their respective rise to power shared many similarities but there were some differences. The leaders of Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany were Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler respectively. The aftermath of the First World War provided both men with a hotbed to come to power. Both Italians and Germans were dismayed and annoyed with the Paris Peace Settlement. Italy joined the First World War in 1915 because the Allied Powers had promised her territorial gains. Premier Orlando joined the Paris Peace Conference as one of the "Big Four". ...read more.

Middle

By 1933 there were six million people unemployed. Germany lost all her overseas markets while Italy's gains in the war could not cover her losses. Both Italians and Germans were despaired; any leader who could achieve quick economic recovery would be certainly popular. The First World War witnessed the victory of the western democratic powers. Yet democracy failed to save the infant republics. The Weimar Republic was the most democratic form of government that Germany had ever had. Kaiser William II abdicated and fled, marking the end of the Hohenzollern empire. However, the party government was terribly inefficient. There were too many parties but none won absolute majority in the Reichstag. As the system of proportional representation was adopted, coalition cabinets were inevitable. Politicians were irresponsible while policies were inconsistent. They were incapable of solving the postwar difficulties. Though Italian politicians might be more experienced, they were corrupt and the frequent changes of coalition governments created similar problems as those of Germany. Efficient one-party rule became a good alternative to both dismayed Italians and Germans. ...read more.

Conclusion

Both had organized highly disciplined parties to spread activities and combat opponents. Both had appealing ideologies and supported an expansionist foreign policy. To Italians and Germans, both were strong leaders in sharp contrast to the weak parliamentary governments. However, there were some differences in the rise of the totalitarian regimes between Italy and Germany. First, Germany inherited Prussian authoritarianism; her democratic tradition was shallower than Italy's. In particular Hitler who had served in the army and promised a massive rearmament programme could get the Reichswehr goodwill. Germans who did not believe democracy supported Hitler's "action without thought" (A.J.P. Taylor) and "return to barbarism". (A. Lyttanson) Second, Mussolini came to power quickly after the First World War, whereas Hitler could not do so. His Munich Putsch failed in 1923. He could not realize his dream until Stresemann's death in 1929 and the occurrence of the Great Depression in 1929-33. Third, Mussolini rose to power with a coup d'etat by his March on Rome, while Hitler's Nazi Party had won almost absolute majority in the Reichstag with popular support and came to power constitutionally. In a nutshell, the various circumstances during the inter-war period did pave the way for the establishment of totalitarian regimes in Italy and Germany. 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    To understand how they both grew up to become the two most powerful leaders in the 20th centuries, historians such as Bullock start form their formative lives. They both grew up facing similar hardships and shared some similar character traits, they both were from lower middle class backgrounds, they were

  2. Why did Mussolini's Fascist Party become popular in Italy after the First World War?

    On the surface maybe Mussolini appeared to have his ideal state, but did he really have the true support of the people and a totalitarian state? By 1926 Mussolini had achieved his ambition of becoming the dictator of Italy. Leading up to 1926 Mussolini unified the squadristi into a national

  1. Despite it all too obvious political and economic failings, in terms of its society ...

    Either judgment has been discredited amongst contemporary historians. In my opinion one issue that cannot be discredited, and has withstood much scrutiny over the years, is the lasting ideological and cultural legacy that Weimar Germany left behind. In terms of cultural initiative and diversity, the Weimar Republic was without doubt

  2. How totalitarian was fascist Italy?

    From 1924 onwards, the population as a whole was subject to control by the government through various channels. A secret police was created, OVRA, which was given wide powers. Their role was to eliminate "enemies" to the regime and regulate party members for Mussolini.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    No regime in history has ever paid such careful attention to psychological factors in politics. Hitler was a master of mass emotion. To attend one of his big meetings was to go through an emotional experience, not to listen to an argument or a program.

  2. Vietnam war

    * The tet offensive created a swing of the public's approval of johnson's handling of the war. * Beginning of de-escalation �Johnson : 'We shall accelerate the re-equipment of South Vietnam's armed forces... this will enable them progressively to take a larger share of combat operations against the communist invaders' � in his resignation speech.

  1. 'Was Germany a totalitarian state'?

    It was the reports given by the people of Germany that allowed the Gestapo to make arrests and maintain effective repression. Through encouraging the unsubstantiated gossip that spreads in any community and taking this as concrete evidence, the Nazi party and more particularly the Gestapo were able to maintain a degree of control over people's everyday lives.

  2. Compare and contrast Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany as totalitarian states. (1996)

    The regimes were organized in a hierarchy and headed by these all-powerful leaders. Both Mussolini and Hitler were the personification of the State. By comparison, however, Hitler was more powerful as he was the supreme head of the State. After the death of President Hindenburg in 1934, Hitler merged Presidency and Chancellorship, and inherited the position of Commander-in-Chief.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work