• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What were the common factors that led to the establishment of totalitarian regimes in Italy and Germany in the inter-war period? (1990)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What were the common factors that led to the establishment of totalitarian regimes in Italy and Germany in the inter-war period? (1990) Totalitarian regimes refer to the type of government in which the State has total control over all aspects of people's life. Main features include an infallible leader, planned economy, strict party discipline, strong armament, an official doctrine that everyone has to believe, and absolute obedience of individuals to the State, etc. During the period 1919-39 there saw the rise of totalitarian regimes in some European countries. The most important ones in Western Europe were Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. Their respective rise to power shared many similarities but there were some differences. The leaders of Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany were Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler respectively. The aftermath of the First World War provided both men with a hotbed to come to power. Both Italians and Germans were dismayed and annoyed with the Paris Peace Settlement. Italy joined the First World War in 1915 because the Allied Powers had promised her territorial gains. Premier Orlando joined the Paris Peace Conference as one of the "Big Four". ...read more.

Middle

By 1933 there were six million people unemployed. Germany lost all her overseas markets while Italy's gains in the war could not cover her losses. Both Italians and Germans were despaired; any leader who could achieve quick economic recovery would be certainly popular. The First World War witnessed the victory of the western democratic powers. Yet democracy failed to save the infant republics. The Weimar Republic was the most democratic form of government that Germany had ever had. Kaiser William II abdicated and fled, marking the end of the Hohenzollern empire. However, the party government was terribly inefficient. There were too many parties but none won absolute majority in the Reichstag. As the system of proportional representation was adopted, coalition cabinets were inevitable. Politicians were irresponsible while policies were inconsistent. They were incapable of solving the postwar difficulties. Though Italian politicians might be more experienced, they were corrupt and the frequent changes of coalition governments created similar problems as those of Germany. Efficient one-party rule became a good alternative to both dismayed Italians and Germans. ...read more.

Conclusion

Both had organized highly disciplined parties to spread activities and combat opponents. Both had appealing ideologies and supported an expansionist foreign policy. To Italians and Germans, both were strong leaders in sharp contrast to the weak parliamentary governments. However, there were some differences in the rise of the totalitarian regimes between Italy and Germany. First, Germany inherited Prussian authoritarianism; her democratic tradition was shallower than Italy's. In particular Hitler who had served in the army and promised a massive rearmament programme could get the Reichswehr goodwill. Germans who did not believe democracy supported Hitler's "action without thought" (A.J.P. Taylor) and "return to barbarism". (A. Lyttanson) Second, Mussolini came to power quickly after the First World War, whereas Hitler could not do so. His Munich Putsch failed in 1923. He could not realize his dream until Stresemann's death in 1929 and the occurrence of the Great Depression in 1929-33. Third, Mussolini rose to power with a coup d'etat by his March on Rome, while Hitler's Nazi Party had won almost absolute majority in the Reichstag with popular support and came to power constitutionally. In a nutshell, the various circumstances during the inter-war period did pave the way for the establishment of totalitarian regimes in Italy and Germany. 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Vietnam war

    From the beginning the Cambodian communists were marginalized, during the Geneva Conference of 1954 they were essentially sacrificed by the other communist nations. During 1967 Pol Pot went to Hanoi to seek approval and aid for a planned uprising, but the Vietnamese had an arrangement with Sihanouk and refused to help.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    Only the Fuehrer kept all the threads in his hand and saw the whole design. If ever a man exercised absolute power it was Adolf Hitler. He had a particular and inveterate distrust of experts. He refused to be impressed by the complexity of problems, insisting until it became monotonous

  1. Compare and contrast the situation in Italy 1919-22 with that in Germany 1919-29.

    exiled to Holland and the SPD leader Freidrich Ebert would lead as 'chancellor' of the country. The Germans in 1919 were forced into agreeing to the terms of the treaty of Versailles including the 'guilt of war clause' which shocked the people and the call for reparations in addition.

  2. To what extent is it possible to associate the regimes of Benito Mussolini and ...

    working classes who were facing extreme poverty whilst a few Italians prospered. The Communists called on peasants to seize landowners property and assets across the countryside and willed on by their leaders gangs of armed peasants roamed the countryside attacking and stealing from anyone they deemed fit.

  1. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    She claimed that, "the population had been atomised and mobilised through a ubiquitous system of terror and sophisticated propaganda techniques."2 This ability to manipulated society is fundamental in the understanding of the term totalitarianism. Arendt was able to popularise the term totalitarianism to link fascism and Nazism with communism.3 Arendt's

  2. Despite it all too obvious political and economic failings, in terms of its society ...

    These factors provided the German people with the opportunity to start afresh, to create and mould a society that they would choose to be apart of. It may be argued that the Weimar Republic was fundamentally flawed from its birth, or that diverse political and economic problems led to its downfall.

  1. Examine the main factors, which led British governments to follow a policy of 'appeasement' ...

    The war had left Britain especially poor. The standard of living had fallen drastically and the citizens had helped to pay for their country's defence. The British government could not afford to go to war. The cost of ammunition, arms, fuel, and soldiers' pay, was too much.

  2. 'Was Germany a totalitarian state'?

    This group would, in Hitler's opinion be the most talented as they would have outwitted all their opponents. For this reason Hitler had four offices that claimed to represent him, all of which fought for his attention and approval. This unusual system of administration led to an unusual structure of individual power blocks, all fighting for superiority.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work