• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What were the main factors affecting British foreign policy in the 1920s?

Extracts from this document...


What were the main factors affecting British foreign policy in the 1920s? There are many factors affecting British foreign policy in the 1920s. But there are clearly some that contributed more than others; the majority of the British people were very against war and thought 'Germany should pay' but in the early 1920s opinions changed. Britain's empire faced many problems that it had to deal with, its economy suffered greatly from the first world war and the severe lack of support from allied countries all were significant factors that affected British foreign policy. British public opinion changed from 1918 o early 1920s. After the war the election was won by Lloyd George by campaigning 'make Germany pay.' This was understandable as many people were distraught by the numbers of deaths and wounded in the war (722,000 people died and 1, 676, 00 were wounded.) But by 1920 the British became sympathetic towards Germany. ...read more.


Britain furthermore had huge debts to pay to USA in which the interest rates were accounting for about 40% of the government expenditure. On top of this Britain was owed huge amounts of repayments from France. Its industrial capacity suffered majorly due to the damage of the war this meant that they couldn't afford new equipment or technology. So they fell behind when rearmament begun in the 1930's. Britain lost trade with Japan and India because during the war they were unable to supply there export markets. This meant they lacked imports such a materials etc. Just as Britain's economy was recovering, the Wall Street crash in 1929 managed to put them back to square one. All this contributed to the fact that the government wanted to concentrate spending it money on the more domestic and social side of the economy instead of rearming. This affected the foreign policy because Britain was strong enough in itself to be able to sort out European affairs by its self. ...read more.


They both contradicted each other but Britain needed them equally on its side. All these aspects contributed in affecting British foreign policy in the 1920's and the consequence of it all was appeasement. Appeasement seemed a good idea at the time as it prevented war until 1939. It also meant that Britain was able to avoid involvement in conflicts that the government saw that they couldn't win. The British public influence foreign policy as the government couldn't afford to upset them and be voted out. The economic situation meant that even if Britain did want to do something about all the disagreements and rearm it was virtually impossible without destroying Britain itself. The weakness of the league made it hard to come to agreements and enforce decisions. The lack of allies made it hard for Britain to act on its desires in fear of upsetting the USA or France. The British Empire added to Britain's problems and meant that it had to spread out the army and navy that it had. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Consider How Far Gladstone And Disraeli Differed In Their Policies Regarding The British Empire ...

    This is a valid point, which would label Gladstone with a substantial amount of opportunism something he often described as being a negative quality of Disraeli. Shannon believed that Gladstone's intervention in the 'Bulgarian agitations' was a case of mere opportunism.

  2. Why did a gangster culture develop in the USA in the 1920`s to the ...

    The Commission handled interfamily disputes and set general policy for La Cosa Nostra. It acted as more of a forum of Family Bosses than a board of directors. At the head of each family stood the Dons or Bosses they were the men with all of the power in the Family.

  1. The league of nations - How successful was The League in the 1920's?

    Many businesses did not implement the resolution because they thought it would raise their costs and the L.O.N had no way of enforcing this. The last aim of the League Of Nations was to encourage nations to cooperate, especially in business and trade.

  2. Identify and explain the main features of Japan's foreign policy in the 1920s.

    The influence of this democratic current was felt as early as 1916-17 when school texts were revised to include an emphasis on internationalism. Therefore, Japan adopt a more compromising policy toward the West during the 1920s The decade following the conference at the Versailles was a period of international cooperation for Japan.

  1. What factors have prompted democratisation in Argentina?

    The military while breaking their own rules on governing the state, were also ignoring the powers of the societal forces that were snowballing rapidly. On an international level, the Madres de la Plaza de Mayo, the main human rights organisation that protested silently every Thursday in the main square of

  2. The role of foreign policy on democratic transitions in Armenia and Azerbaijan

    It is necessary to distinguish clearly the differences between 'transitional democracies' and 'consolidated democracies'. In fact it woiuld be erroneous to assume that states emerging from authoritarian regimes could be automatically called democratic just because its officials are popularly elected.

  1. How Strong was Opposition to Continental Commitments in the 1920's

    The army was reduced to a small force obligated to the maintaining of home security and to policing the newly formed empire. Military spending was reduced from �692 million to �115 million within 2 years and did not rise again until 1935.

  2. The Foreign Policy of the Lone Superpower

    An Instrument of Foreign Policy Because the United States was now stuck with dealing with the rest of the world, it has now been compelled to orchestrate its affairs with hundreds of nations that should yield the best results. Since its opening up its doors to foreign affairs, it has

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work