• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What were the main principles of British Foreign Policy from 1793-1853 and how far were they consistent?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What were the main principles of British Foreign Policy from 1793-1853 and how far were they consistent? During the period 1793-1853 Britain had two main aims for her Foreign Policy. Firstly there was the need for National Security to maintain the balance of power and peace in Europe. Secondly there was the desire to expand on the trade front which would in turn lead to expansion of the Empire. It can be said that both of these aims were fully consistent from the years 1793 to 1853 as one can see that Britain's declaration of wars, forging alliances and signing treaties were all based on trading gains and maintaining of sovereignty. Britain's need for security was so important because it needed to exert full power and so in January 1793 Britain declared war on France. The French revolutionary government opened the river Scheldt which served as a quick route to Britain. Therefore Britain was forced to take action against France who was occupying the channel ports. ...read more.

Middle

Another feature of Britain's foreign policy was maintaining the balance of power in Europe among the major powers; Prussia, France, Austria and Russia. This was to prevent a repercussion of France's rule over Europe under Napoleon. In doing this Britain could trade successfully and peacefully in Europe whilst also trading out of the continent and allowing the empire to expand and prosper. Britain's policies throughout the period from 1793 to 1853 were largely based around becoming a world trading empire. Britain's strategy during the Revolutionary War was to protect routes to India. The need to protect the short and long routes to India hugely affected British foreign policy. It explains why Britain clashed with Napoleon on the Battle of the Nile, in order to protect Births trading Routes through Egypt and Britain's desire to keep Russia from obtaining Constantinople hence leading to their protection of the Ottoman Turks. The short Route to India was most important because it was also a link to the Mediterranean. ...read more.

Conclusion

The desire for national security meant that Britain would not let any potential enemy acquire the Channel Ports demonstrated by her declaration of war with France in 1793 and putting the Low Countries under friendly Dutch rule. The other consistent policy to preserve national security was retention of her naval supremacy gained after the Battle of Trafalgar (1805). However British Foreign Policy was not solely guided towards national security but also guided by the desire to expand her trade. Any other British involved foreign incident that did not involve Britain's homeland security involved her trading interests. This desire for expansion of British trade lead to her endeavour in establishing and maintaining peace in Europe (which also affected national security) and to the expansion of her Empire. Thus it can be said that every British foreign policy was in some way derived from her desire for national security of expansion of her trade. These policies stayed consistent from 1793 to 1853 as throughout this period the incidents that involved Britain on an international level always went back to theses policies. ?? ?? ?? ?? Robdeep Sangha U6SB ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Did Mussolini's foreign policy follow and consistent principles?

    The democratic credentials of Mussolini were enhanced upon the meeting of the Italian with Hitler, relation's de-Teri orated quickly when Chancellor Dollfuss was killed however as he was planning to invade Ethiopia Mussolini leant toward the side of democracy. The 'Stresa front' was created, giving Mussolini protection against a potentially re-vitalised Anschluss.

  2. How far did the reforms during the period 1826-39 contribute to the eventual fall ...

    vengeance are supported by the eye-witness account of British Dragoman, Bartolomeo Pisani: Every corrner of the town is searched and every Janissary officer that is caught is conducted to the Grand Vizier and by him ordered to death [...]'.xx The 1826 Janissary purge paved the way for further reform; without

  1. Discuss The African Slave Trade and its influences on the continent. What was ...

    (There were occasional military campaigns organized by Europeans to capture slaves, especially by the Portuguese in what is now Angola, but this accounts for only a small percentage of the total). Who Has the Worst Record for Trading Slaves? During the eighteenth century, the slave trade accounted for the transport

  2. Mussolinis’s Foreign Policy

    In 1924 the Pact of Rome was signed with Yugoslavia, by which Italy received the long-disputed town of Fiume, though a part of it, Susak, went to Yugoslavia, along with port Barros. Two treaties with Alabania were signed in 1926 and 1927, firmly established Italian influence in Albania.

  1. "How far do the sources suggest consistent aims in Mussolini's foreign policy 1922-1939?"

    up support for the war, however he was greeted with an apathetic, "stony indifference." Source 5 shows us Mussolini's feeling about the Germans in 1934. This date is significant because it is a few months after Hitler's visit to Italy which was described as "tense".

  2. "How far do the sources suggest consistent aims in Mussolini's foreign policy 1922-39?"

    This statement may conceivably be what Graham considers to be true at this time, but it is not consistent with source 1. There is little sign of any consistency between sources 1 and 3, with Graham suggesting Italy has no evident foreign policy, and Mussolini setting out his aims of foreign policy, clearly and comprehensively.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work