• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which factor had the greatest bearing on Russia's international relations (foreign policy) in the period 1900 to 1941; ideology or economic considerations?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Which factor had the greatest bearing on Russia's international relations (foreign policy) in the period 1900 to 1941; ideology or economic considerations? During the period 1900 to 1941, there were three main factors that had bearing on Russia's foreign policy. These factors are; ideological concerns, economic considerations and issues with security. All these factors are equally as important in the period 1900 to 1941; which includes Tsarist Russia, Lenin's time in power and Stalin's reign. At various times, a factor was of more importance. For example, ideology was of extreme importance to Lenin as he was setting up a new Communist state. This essay looks at these three periods and will attempt to establish which factor played the most important role in Russia's foreign policy at that particular time. Between 1900 and 1917, Tsar Nicholas was Russia's head of state. The multi-national empire was an autocracy which exercised tight control over its people. ...read more.

Middle

It also helped Russia develop closer links with Britain and France which would boost Russian trade. All in all, the most important factor bearing on Russia's foreign policy between 1900 and 1917 was economic. Once Lenin took control after the 1917 October Revolution, Russia and the driving forces behind its foreign policy changed dramatically. Lenin made such a huge impact on the world during his time as the leader of the first ever successful communist revolution; the impression he left was predominately ideological and this was also the factor which played a huge role in his foreign policy. The exportation of communism was devised by Trotsky and supported by Lenin during the period 1917 to 1924. It was known as "The Permanent Revolution" and enjoyed brief success in Hungary, Slovakia and Bavaria. The Comintern was set up to influence and aid other European Communist parties. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin discarded NEP and introduced a policy of rapid industrialisation via a number of his famous "5 Year Plans". The result of this was that Russia became the world's second greatest industrial power. Therefore, economic considerations were a key element to the development of Stalin's foreign policy. Stalin knew that the USSR had ideological enemies who may attack at any time so when considering the extent to which ideology and security affected Stalin's foreign policy one must look at his change in policy from The Permanent Revolution to "Socialism in One Country". Lenin and Trotsky's Comintern experienced being downgraded in importance. The result of this was a more secure USSR in Stalin's eyes. In conclusion, these three distinct periods in Russia's history between 1900 to 1941 were characterized by the need to industrialize, strict control within Russia and the desire to prevent being attacked from the East or the West. The three different leaders went about achieving their goals in different ways but in the end the economic, security and ideological factors were all of significance when developing foreign policy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    To do this the emphasis was to be firmly on heavy industry - coal, iron, steel, electricity, and the infrastructure needed to move such bulky goods. * A second emphasis was to build these new industries in the East - beyond the Urals - away from the threat of Western invasion.

  2. To what extent was Gladstone's religion the driving force behind his attempt to 'sabotage' ...

    Although Disraeli felt that it was necessary to support the Turks despite their actions in Bulgaria in order to deter Russia from gaining power on territory on the pretext of moral intervention, Gladstone would have found this inexcusable according to his personal moral code and 'European sense', principally derived from

  1. To what extent was Bismarck in control of the direction Germany's Foreign Policy took ...

    Another point, indicating that Bismarck was not in control of Germany's foreign policy, is how during this time of elevated discussion and activity between Germany and the rest of Europe, Bismarck failed to involve Britain, who at the time was the most powerful nation in the world.

  2. To what extent were economic considerations the main motive for Portuguese exploration and empire ...

    In addition to wanting to find gold the Portuguese also explored in order to try and find a new way to import spices to the country instead of through the Mediterranean, where the Venetian traders had established a monopoly on these trade roots this was because the cost involved in

  1. 'In the context of the period 1715-1815 to what extent were economic factors the ...

    These soon turned violent, contributing both to the politicalisation of the Third Estate and the growing displays of discontent, culminating with the Storming of the Bastille on 14th July 1789. As well as this violence being a catalyst of the Revolution in itself, the financial troubles of the 1780s negatively

  2. Free essay

    Examine the impact of policy changes of 1921 on the development of the Soviet ...

    Fighting took place along ill-defined fronts across Russia and the fights were bitter and ferocious in which millions died. The Red Army was extremely effective and wiped out threats in June 1919 from Khaskov in the North-East and the Summer of 1918 where Denikin and Kornilovs attack on the South was wiped out.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Gained a reputation for inconsistency by not supporting Lenin in 1917 and constantly switching between supporting Stalin and supporting Trotsky. 3. Not strong enough to be the leader of the USSR. 4. Seriously underestimated his opponents. Trotsky: Initially a member of the Mensheviks (Bolshevik?s opposition)

  2. To what extent did the post-war peacemaking and peacekeeping efforts affect international relations leading ...

    Either way, the source was useful in obtaining pertinent information. (86 words) Section D- Analysis Following the Great Depression and the breakup of the League of Nations, France was unable to intervene with the rise of Nazi Germany in any peacekeeping efforts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work