• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which is the more satisfactory explanation of peace between the USSR and the USA during the Cold War: bipolarity or nuclear deterrence?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Which is the more satisfactory explanation of peace between the USSR and the USA during the Cold War: bipolarity or nuclear deterrence? Introduction The Cold War was 'fought' between the United States of America and the Soviet Union over a six decade period from the 1940s - 1990s. The war remained 'cold' due to a number of factors. One of the main factors was that of bipolarity. However this is not a factor which stands alone. Bipolarity was reinforced by nuclear deterrence which kept the peace between the two superpowers over the Cold War period. Bipolarity Bipolarity is a system whereby two individual or groups of states compete against each other for power and supremacy. The two main antagonists in the Cold War were the United States of America and the Soviet Union. They competed against each other on a multitude of things including economic systems, political systems, and military strategies. However this competition never escalated into direct war between the two due to the tight bipolarity which existed between the United States and the Soviet Union. They were inextricably linked together. Kenneth Waltz suggested that multipolar systems are less stable than bipolar systems. ...read more.

Middle

The period before the d�tente seemed to be hopeful in the search for peace. There was a policy of coexistence which was adopted by Khrushchev. From 1953 onwards he persued a policy of peaceful coexistence with capitalism and the United States. However his policy was somewhat contradictory with attempts to seek the increase the Soviet Union's power in places where the opportunity presented itself. These areas included Hungary, Cuba, Egypt and Berlin. The d�tente which proceeded the period of coexistence was a period of co-operation between the superpowers. Leonid Brezhnev explained that the d�tente meant the "transition to normal, smooth relations among states."1 He also went on to say that there should be a willingness to resolve "differences and disputes not by force, threats or sabre rattling, but by peaceful means at the negotiating table"2 This positive rhetoric symbolised the period with the United States and the Soviet Union having some degree of trust between them. Henry Kissinger also wished to see an environment whereby "competition (led) to co-operation."3 Nuclear Deterrence Nuclear deterrence played a major part in the Cold War as it reinforced the bipolar structure. Deterrence can be explained by being able to persuade a potential enemy to abandon it's attempt to increase it's power "by making it appear to him ...read more.

Conclusion

Both saw defeat as a non starter s therefore neither was willing to initiate proceedings. The United States did have the chance to destroy the Soviet Union with it's nuclear arsenal before 1949. However they chose not to which could be viewed as restraint on their behalf. The more satisfactory explanation of peace between the USSR and the USA during the Cold War is bipolarity. However this is not taken by itself. Nuclear deterrence reinforced the theory behind bipolarity. Bipolarity was the main factor because the two superpowers matched each others strength and military capabilities. The d�tente which occurred was a period where there was co-operation between the two and strengthened the case for bipolarity. Nuclear deterrence backs up the claim that bipolarity is the more satisfactory explanation since each superpower had some sort of balance in their arsenals. Each was afraid to take part in a nuclear war since total annihilation is inevitable. Bipolarity is the more satisfactory explanation overall in the context of peace between the two superpowers during the Cold War. 1 L. Brezhnev, Moscow News (21 January 1979) 2 L. Brezhnev, Moscow News (21 January 1979) 3 H. Kissinger (1968) 4 T. C. Schelling, The Strategy Of Conflict ?? ?? ?? ?? WP9 Hazel Smith Gino Fernandes 6 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Hence, after promising Stalin a second front in August 1942, Roosevelt had to withdraw the pledge and ask for delay of the second front until the spring of 1943. When that date arrived, he was forced to pull back yet again for political and logistical reasons.

  2. The Cuban Missile Crisis and the blockade

    In terms of the air strike, it was clear to Eubank that with the United States launching the first strike, Russia might feel as if they were justified in retaliating with nuclear missiles. The blockade is seen as the best option to Eubank, as he feels it was a gateway to further proceedings.

  1. What part did Ronald Reagan play in bringing the Cold War to an end?

    In 1987 Gorbachev visited the United States and there the first real movement on arms reduction was made when he and Reagan agreed to destroy all intermediate range missiles.

  2. A Study of Air Supremacy in the Korean War.

    To adapt pilots had to fly at 6,000 foot minimums and add a wingman whose job it was to spot ground fire and relay that information to the pilot taking photos. In October of 1951, FEAF came to the realization in order to get pictures of MiG Alley a faster aircraft was needed.

  1. How True is it to say that the period 1953-1962 saw a relaxation of ...

    Although Khrushchev's speech to congress on this subject had been intended to be kept secret, news of it had spread throughout Europe and to the US by the end of the month. The West viewed this denouncement of the purges and rehabilitation of the victims of Stalin and Beria as

  2. To what extent was the nuclear arms race a more stabilising factor in the ...

    It was a policy of intensely threatening the opposing side with action without delivering the action. In this case the United States were threatening the USSR with Nuclear action. It was a very dangerous policy as the name suggests it would go right to the 'brink' of Nuclear War.

  1. How far did peaceful coexistence ease Cold War tensions between the Soviet Union and ...

    But by 1954, Khrushchev saw that the Porkalla region was more of a financial drain than an asset, and so he gave it back to Finland, and the influence the Soviets had over the region was reduced significantly(although the Soviets still ensured that Finland would not pose a threat to the Soviet Union when necessary, especially by intervening in elections).

  2. Superpower Relations and the Thaw in the Cold War

    However, the ?thaw? was the result of factors within the wider context of international relations that pushed both sides towards seeking some degree of accommodation with the other. The Consolidation of Positions * By 1949 the Iron Curtain marked a defined line between the two superpowers spheres of influence in Europe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work