• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which of these judgements best Reflects the State of Imperial Russia in 1914? By 1914 all the Signs were there that Imperial Russia was heading towards a Major Confrontation between intransient Tsarism and the Forces of Change or

Extracts from this document...


Which of these judgements best Reflects the State of Imperial Russia in 1914? "By 1914 all the Signs were there that Imperial Russia was heading towards a Major Confrontation between intransient Tsarism and the Forces of Change" or "The Prospects of Stable evolutionary Development in 1914 were good until Foreign Affairs Intervened" Hanoom 13Sh The 1905 revolution had tested the strength of Tsarism at its core. However, the survival of the regime was due to the fact that whilst in 1905 the Russian rebels were confidant enough to voice their discontent they were not on a mission to usurp tsarist authority. It can be argued that whilst there was an active petitioning for change in 1905 by 1914 many critics came to the realisation that real change under despotic and authoritarian Tsarism was a long way off. But whether or not this itself had set Russia on an irreversible path against the established system is debatable. The main argument against the intervention of foreign affairs being instrumental in stopping Russia's prospects of stable evolutionary development is that Nicholas did not keep to one of the key concessions of the October Manifesto by a granting constitutional monarchy. Nicholas had absolutely no intention of handing power to the people and the Duma was the creation of an urgent need to appease the 1905 rebels. ...read more.


But partly the innate conservatism of the Russian people meant that this lack of strong alternative leadership to Nicholas in 1914 was something that resulted in any critics of the regime being unsure of whom to support. The opposition was inherently disunited and the alliances of different social groups were hard to fathom in a society where traditional division had always stood between the upper and lower classes. Another explanation for the failure of groups like the Kadets and the Liberals to gain the active support of the public is that their concern for securing a constitution subordinated the social welfare of the people who did not feel that their cause was being fought for. By 1914 the opposing parties to the tsarist regime were much less powerful than in 1905. The liberals were no longer seen as revolutionary and Witte's liberal concessions had split the opposition. Therefore anyone who wanted change did not think it achievable through a weak, liberal Duma with little influence. Consequently supporting the Bolsheviks in 1917 was a powerful alternative as it empowered a group of extremists willing to make vigorous changes. During the years 1908-1914 Russia was moving quickly forward, trying to develop its stagnant and backward economy. ...read more.


This was exacerbated by a power struggle between the Duma and Rasputin who was seen as manipulating the tsarina and steering the country closer to catastrophe. The war was the force, which interrupted Russia's progression into a more Western and developed society with better standards of living and equality. On the home front the food shortages, starvation in the big cities, coal shortages in the merciless Russian winter and inflation ensured a demoralised and exasperated population. The hopeless situation in Russia would later spark what was to be the end of tsarist Russia as Nicholas survived as long as he maintained the loyalty of the army and the Cossacks. Had it not been for the war these key groups would have remained loyal to Nicholas, especially due to the progressive and westward looking path that Russia was on. It is likely that at the end of Nicholas' reign the Duma would have become a far more influential body and that his royal successors would have paid greater heed to the advice of the assembly. Obviously it cannot be denied that a stronger and more prudent ruler than Nicholas would have survived the war, at the cost of making small concessions and curbing his autocratic power. Whilst this may have weakened the monarchy significantly it would have more importantly ensured its survival well into the 20th century. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Revision Table - Tudor Rebellions

    * Government agreed to negotiate with rebels. * Aske and ringleaders rounded up, tried in London and then executed. * Rents fixed and subsidy stopped. * Some monasteries re-established. * Rebels hung in Carlisle and Cumberland. * Aske --> member of the gentry, a local lawyer.

  2. To what extent did WW1 cause the collapse of Tsarism?

    The Imperial Guard - those who protect the Tsars from danger - opened fire on an unarmed march of demonstrators on their way to the palace to present a petition to the Tsar. It is believed roughly 200 of the demonstrators were shot dead from the 200,000 strong crowd who peacefully marched their way to the Palace.

  1. Why Were Some Forms Of Nationalism More Successful Than Others In Achieving Concessions From ...

    By this advanced stage of the nineteenth century, it looked concretely as if Constitutional Nationalism had been exclusively the most effective, even further cemented by the Phoenix Park Murders of 1882, where the Chief Secretary and the Under Secretary were murdered by a band known as 'The Invincibles', who had no connection to Parnell.

  2. A direct comparison of the role of central power and control during the late ...

    However the approaches to these policies were quite different, mirroring Russia's relative economic position and contemporary priorities. Whilst under the Tsars, Russia had seen a slow but gradual economic development, by the time leaders such as Stalin and Khrushchev came to power Russia was considerably economically lagging behind and such these leaders took personal decisive action.

  1. The First English Civil War

    Bristol, the second port of the kingdom, was their objective. On 26 July, four days from the opening of the siege, it was in their hands. Waller, with the beaten remnant of his army at Bath, was powerless to intervene. The effect of this blow was felt even in Dorset.

  2. Louis XIV's fondness of war resulted his downfall

    However, Louis made some huge mistakes and it was these that almost certainly provoked his enemies into war against France. The following miss-interpretations seemed to show Louis as someone that did enjoy conflict, as well as someone that threw his weight around, always thinking he could get what he desired.

  1. To what extent had the Russian economy been successfully modernised by 1914?

    This was partly because the majority of serfs had no money to spend, let alone invest, and were unable to prosper economically. Consequently, it can be seen that in 1856 serfdom was a break on economic development. This was understood by the Tsarist government, and they aimed to remove this

  2. How and why did the Bolsheviks gain power in 1917?

    Following the events of the 1905 revolution, the resulting achievement by the Russian revolutionaries was the October Manifesto, which allowed for greater civil rights for citizens, and for a national parliament; the Duma. The achievement of the Dumas themselves was quite an accomplishment and important advance of the nation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work