• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who controlled English foreign affairs in 1515-1529 - Henry or Wolsey?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Who controlled English foreign affairs in 1515-1529 - Henry or Wolsey? A common view of Henry VIII's and Wolsey's foreign policy is that it was a failure. Reasons for this view are that Henry failed to achieve his primary goal, which was to recover the French empire, which had been, conquered by Henry V. This aim was unrealistic. Henry had high objectives, which were inexperienced. Henry's policy was often illogical, which allowed more cunning operators, such as Ferdinand of Aragon and Emperor Maximilian, to manipulate him. Henry unlike Wolsey wanted war and glory whereas Wolsey was trying to gain peace. Henry's first success in glory was in 1514 with the peace with France after the battle of spurs, the war was too expensive to continue but Henry has glory and gets recognised as a "player" in Europe. As king, Henry inherited from his father a budget surplus and a precedent for autocratic rule. In 1511, Henry joined Pope Julius II, King Ferdinand II of Aragon, Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian I, and the Venetians in their Holy League against France. Historians have argued about Wolsey's motives for his foreign policy and many believe that there was not one foreign policy but two, i.e. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore Wolsey believed the Treaty of London would bring peace. This was a successful attempt at bringing peace as all the powers of Europe signed and agreed yet it was considered only a "breathing space" for the great powers of Europe. Peace, however, was far from lasting. Encouraged by Charles V, Henry VIII [against Wolsey's advice] invaded France in 1523. The English invaders were soon forced to withdraw, and Francis I of France was confident enough to invade Italy in 1525. The peace treaty collapsed in 1521 due to Francis capturing Navarre from Charles V. The rivalry between Charles V and Francis I was useful for Wolsey and Henry. In 1522 Henry again wanted glory as he tries again to defeat France, Thomas Howard led the invasion of France. Yet this was failure the English armies were beaten and the war achieved nothing and was unpopular in England. In 1525 Wolsey creates a taxation to pay for Henry's foreign campaign, the "Amicable grant" causes riots in East Angelica and the Duke of Wolfolk was sent to put down the rebellion. Wolsey was then forced to abandon this taxation and publicly apologise to Henry. ...read more.

Conclusion

What Wolsey understood was that, when there was peace between France and Spain, England became isolated, and it was pointless for England to ally with one of the two, Enlgand was considered unneeded. Therefore, it was beneficial for England, in the hope of gaining new territory and influence, that there be continual conflict between the two powers. Between 1515 and 1517, England was very much isolated because of the peaceful relations between France and Spain. Wolsey had to assert English influence through another means, so he conveniently chose peace. The Treaty of London [1518] showed Wolsey as the arbiter of Europe, organising a massive peace summit involving twenty nations. This put England at the forefront of European diplomacy and drew it out of isolation, making England a desirable ally. This is well illustrated by the Anglo-French treaty signed two days afterwards. Both Henry and Wolsey failed in practical diplomacy, but over the time both gained what each of them wanted. Wolsey gained legatus a later and Henry gained the prestige and the opportunity to be the chivalrous king of the Middle Ages. From this we could say that foreign policy was both Hnery's and Wolsey's even though it seems Wolsey did the majority of the work. Clare Worsfold ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful was English foreign policy in the years 1509 1529?

    4 star(s)

    He also attempted to befriend anyone who could help him better his position and power; which was why it was beneficial for him to please Henry, as the King could grant him the power he desired. After the death of Frances King Louis XII, the Anglo-French alliance was in danger of collapsing.

  2. With what success did Wolsey pursue his aims in foreign policy?

    The ascension of Charles ruined the first part of this: he was a young, ambitious ruler and decided instead to make peace with Francis at Noyon. Maximillian also decided to make peace with France. Obviously, Wolsey's anti-French policy was therefore ruined, and he was forced to seek peace with France, leading to the Treaty of London.

  1. While English foreign policy was a failure to 1529, Wolsey should be regarded as ...

    Wolsey changed this with his Court of Star Chamber, where he moderated and judged cases himself. He was also responsible for the switch from common law, an archaic law system that tended to favour the nobility, to civil law, which was more modern and advantageous to the average worker.

  2. Why and with whom was Wolsey unpopular with by 1529?

    The loss of respect was mainly due to his loss of reputation in terms of religion, which weakened the unity and influence of the church - and this view occurred from his frivolous, scandalous, and hypocritical actions, such as condemning the debauchery of corrupt clergymen, yet himself partaking in the

  1. How Far Can It Be Argued That Wolsey Was Less Successful

    His attempt to reform monastic constitutions was just the re-issuing of old documents. He did not fully implement his plans to reform the dioceses. His building of the college at Oxford and school at Ipswich has been criticised as self-aggrandisement and wishing to leave a permanent mark of his power in England.

  2. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    Once Charles' had his coronation he was strongly urged by his more diplomacy-oriented counsellors to lessen his military efforts against the English and make peace with the Duke of Burgundy. Charles was no longer capable of financing his army thus desperately wanted peace; if he lost the support of his

  1. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    as he describes how Henry underlined a passage in his own personal bible after Katherine was executed. It read: ?For the lips of an harlot are a drop in honey comb and her throat softer than ale. But at the last, she?s as bitter as wormwood and as sharp as a two-edged sword?.

  2. How successful was Wolseys foreign policy in satisfying the ambitions of Henry VIII in ...

    Wolsey was blamed by many for the shambles that developed after the army landed in France despite the fact that he was a junior member of the Royal Council. However, Henry did not blame Wolsey and the manner in which Wolsey had conducted himself in correspondence with Ferdinand of Aragon impressed Henry.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work