• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who do you think was the more important figure in Russian history, Lenin or Stalin? Explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...


David Norton 5th Form History Coursework Russia 1905 - 1941 Who do you think was the more important figure in Russian history, Lenin or Stalin? Explain your answer. In 1928 Bukharin was for the New Economic Policy which Lenin had set up, however, Stalin was for the Five Year Plans. Stalin's aim was to modernise the USSR and to catch up, and even overtake, the West's industrial power. Heavy industry, such as iron, steel, coal and hydroelectric power producers, chemical industries, and transport, received lots of income from the government. There was mass regimentation of society. Wherever Stalin needed workers and labour he sent his workforce. In 1929, Stalin announced agriculture was to be collectivised. Stalin's plan was to make all 100 million peasants join collective farms but many peasants opposed his plans. ...read more.


The collective farms which peasants worked on were called Kolkhozes. On these farms, peasants grew crops and gave a certain amount to the state and the surplus was consumed or sold. Another collective farm was a Sovkhoz. These farms were under pressure to produce crops all year round, whatever the weather, and they got paid a certain amount of money for doing so. One of Stalin's favourite workers was a man called Stakhanov who was a giant miner who mined huge amounts of coal compared to other miners. Stalin used him in propaganda, as he wanted all the workers to be like Stakhanov. Soon Stalin had a new slogan: "Five in Four". What Stalin meant by this was that the Five Year Plans could be completed in four years. This is what Stalin hoped for. ...read more.


However, when Lenin set up the New Economic Policy he did not intend to keep it for long for he set up the GOSPLAN in 1921. This was the State Planning Department and Lenin meant for this to take over from the New Economic Policy when it was no longer needed. Also, Stalin considered all of his actions to be what Lenin wanted. Stalin always felt he was doing what Lenin wanted to do. It is hard to say who was the more important figure in Russian history because Lenin made all the plans for what he wanted for the country but Stalin carried out these plans and made Russia a better country. However, Stalin's paranoia got the better of him and led him to murder a large portion of his army in the Purges. I think Stalin was the more important figure as he improved Russia, even if it was under Lenin's plans. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Who was the more important figure in Russian history Lenin or Stalin?

    Stalin came to power after the death of Lenin. Communism was already formed but there was still need to keep communism strong throughout the country. Lenin had already formed Communism and made many political decisions and it was Stalin's job to keep this going and make Russia a stronger country.

  2. Who do you think was the more important figure in Russian history, Lenin or ...

    Lenin was successful in establishing a form of Communism and Stalin did not, and would not have been able to do this. Lenin was also responsible for many of the bad things about the Communist rule. He introduced the idea of a secret police - he had his Cheka and Red Terror.

  1. Assess the economic, social and political consequences of the collectivisation of Russian agriculture in ...

    countryside and eliminate the class of the kulaks (Millar 1982 p63), and as the majority of the Soviet Union had become collectivised so early on in the collectivisation process, this can be seen as a success for Stalin. Furthermore, collectivisation was not only used to defeat any "peasant obstructionism", but

  2. Russia and its Locomotive of History

    The defeat proved to be a national humiliation for Russia, which was to cause a rapid and worrying change. The defeat of Russia in the Russo-Japanese War played a major role in causing the build-up of tension and unrest that led to the 1905 Revolution.

  1. Who Was More Important - Lenin Or Stalin?

    Lenin managed to win the Civil War against the Whites. This was done with a combination of using terror and the new Red Army organised by Trotsky. Also, this was when the Cheka came into effect and make sure that nobody in Bolshevik territories co-operated with the Whites.

  2. Blitzkreig coursework

    Another mistake by the French was a false sense of security that was instilled in the war-weary nation by the Maginot Line. This was known as the "Maginot Line mentality", the French believed that the Maginot Line, a line of defensive fortifications running up the French Eastern frontier to Longuyon, would protect them from any invasion on their eastern frontier.

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    So therefore in to the vacuum of power two types of government emerged, neither of which had the appeal or resources to assume total control. This does not mean, however, that dual power was a workable option and that it could have lasted indefinitely because of the fact that the

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    This symbol represents the panic and terror he introduced in the russians and that he would obtain the whole control of eveything and everyone no matter at what cost, or who had to die in response. Stalin was prepared to see people die. The purges tooj away thousands of deaths.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work