• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who do you think was the more important figure in Russian history, Lenin or Stalin? Explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

David Norton 5th Form History Coursework Russia 1905 - 1941 Who do you think was the more important figure in Russian history, Lenin or Stalin? Explain your answer. In 1928 Bukharin was for the New Economic Policy which Lenin had set up, however, Stalin was for the Five Year Plans. Stalin's aim was to modernise the USSR and to catch up, and even overtake, the West's industrial power. Heavy industry, such as iron, steel, coal and hydroelectric power producers, chemical industries, and transport, received lots of income from the government. There was mass regimentation of society. Wherever Stalin needed workers and labour he sent his workforce. In 1929, Stalin announced agriculture was to be collectivised. Stalin's plan was to make all 100 million peasants join collective farms but many peasants opposed his plans. ...read more.

Middle

The collective farms which peasants worked on were called Kolkhozes. On these farms, peasants grew crops and gave a certain amount to the state and the surplus was consumed or sold. Another collective farm was a Sovkhoz. These farms were under pressure to produce crops all year round, whatever the weather, and they got paid a certain amount of money for doing so. One of Stalin's favourite workers was a man called Stakhanov who was a giant miner who mined huge amounts of coal compared to other miners. Stalin used him in propaganda, as he wanted all the workers to be like Stakhanov. Soon Stalin had a new slogan: "Five in Four". What Stalin meant by this was that the Five Year Plans could be completed in four years. This is what Stalin hoped for. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, when Lenin set up the New Economic Policy he did not intend to keep it for long for he set up the GOSPLAN in 1921. This was the State Planning Department and Lenin meant for this to take over from the New Economic Policy when it was no longer needed. Also, Stalin considered all of his actions to be what Lenin wanted. Stalin always felt he was doing what Lenin wanted to do. It is hard to say who was the more important figure in Russian history because Lenin made all the plans for what he wanted for the country but Stalin carried out these plans and made Russia a better country. However, Stalin's paranoia got the better of him and led him to murder a large portion of his army in the Purges. I think Stalin was the more important figure as he improved Russia, even if it was under Lenin's plans. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Russia and its Locomotive of History

    of these reforms could have embedded the revolt notions that the war had brought to attention. In 1877, Russia then became involved in the Russo-Turkish war. Despite the fact that Alexander II did not want to fight Turkey, it primarily culminated a year later in an initial gain for Russia

  2. Who Was More Important - Lenin Or Stalin?

    On the 12th November, Lenin created more new policies such as limiting the workers hours to eight and rules made about holidays and overtime. This improved working conditions in Russia and made the economy more efficient. One of the decrees was that on 18th January, the Assembly opened.

  1. Who was the more important figure in Russian history Lenin or Stalin?

    Stalin came to power after the death of Lenin. Communism was already formed but there was still need to keep communism strong throughout the country. Lenin had already formed Communism and made many political decisions and it was Stalin's job to keep this going and make Russia a stronger country.

  2. Who do you think was the more important figure in Russian history, Lenin or ...

    Lenin was successful in establishing a form of Communism and Stalin did not, and would not have been able to do this. Lenin was also responsible for many of the bad things about the Communist rule. He introduced the idea of a secret police - he had his Cheka and Red Terror.

  1. Blitzkreig coursework

    Army groups were not deployed in the Norwegian campaign as the main invasion was by sea and air, this was perhaps a contingent factor in the long amount of time that was taken for the German army to occupy Norway in comparison with the much quicker victories in Poland and France.

  2. Assess the economic, social and political consequences of the collectivisation of Russian agriculture in ...

    its own traditions and norms and the peasants of Turkmenistan made their views extremely clear they disagreed with the policy and engaged in protest methods such as passive resistance (Edgar 2004 p296). The political consequences of collectivisation is that the policy was used in order to spread communism to the

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    The provisional government was merely too weak to stop Kornilov from taking control of Pertograd. The Bolsheviks defeated Kornilov, and the Bolsheviks were now seen as heroes and stronger than ever. Leaving the provisional government with little power or support and later lost more supports from the people when it tried to ban the Bolsheviks.

  2. Blitzkrieg coursework

    This disorganisation was partly due to the surprise tactic employed by the Germans and partly due to the "phony war" mentality and the incompetence of the French. At this time the British had an extremely strong navy and British naval aid to Norway may have prevented the occupation of Norway,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work