• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who do you think was the more important figure in Russian history, Lenin or Stalin?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Who do you think was the more important figure in Russian history, Lenin or Stalin? I think that Lenin was the more important figure in Russian history. Fundamentally Stalin would not have been able to do what Lenin did, and he would not have been able to do what he himself did where it not for Lenin. Stalin did actually do far more than Lenin did, but there are some obvious reasons for this. Lenin was only in control of Russia for 7 years, and for the last two years he was ill. Stalin ruled for a total of 25 years. Lenin also had the hardest part to do simply that he had to establish Communism. It was Lenin who got the Communists in power through the November Revolution of 1917; it was Lenin who kept the Communists in power during the Civil War. It was Lenin who established the Communist principles of the time. ...read more.

Middle

Maybe this would have resulted in Russia not winning the war, but I think Lenin would have been very prepared for an attack by the Fascist State. Stalin even encouraged the 'cult of Lenin' because Lenin was considered a God in Russian society. It was ironic how the Communists condemned Christianity for saying 'put up with your life now and you can go to heaven' when the Communists, almost a secular religion, said 'put up with a bad life now and after you die your children and grandchildren will reap the benefits. As Lenin said about the NEP "We retreated on this one condition alone when we introduced our NEP so as to begin a more determined after the retreat," refers to introducing the NEP because of the horrendous outcome of War Communism. So, he would have changed things had he survived. The NEP was an economic plateau for Stalin so that he could introduce 'State Socialism' Stalin was in a far better position than Lenin to enforce Communism. ...read more.

Conclusion

His brother's death had caused him to become a revolutionary, and even if it sometimes seemed that things were not dissimilar to the Tsar's reign, Russia was definitely experiencing a revolution. Lenin was on his way to industrialization of Russia in his policy of Electrification and the original putting the factories under worker's control. Stalin didn't industrialize in this way, but Lenin's way could have been as, if not more successful. Lenin began the world's first ever Communist state and will be remembered for this forever. Stalin has as much recognition as Lenin does, but he ruled for far longer and his accomplishments, while phenomenal, in a good and terrible way, were not as remarkable as Lenin's. As Trotsky fittingly said 'granted the presence of Lenin the October Revolution would have been victorious anyway' and, essentially, Stalin would never have been able to do what Lenin did by getting the Bolsheviks into power. As Helvetius said, which aptly describes Stalin, 'every period has its great men, and if these are lacking, it invents them,' ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Did Stalin betray the Russian Revolution?

    These were elements of the monolithic power base which was the antithesis of everything Marx envisaged. Yet everything Stalin did in power was justified by reference to Marxist-Leninist doctrine. It was ironic that the Communist movement had become so dependent on one man in spite of its doctrine, which warned

  2. Russia and its Locomotive of History

    Consequently, there were many against Alexander's traditional Russian policies. Assassination attempts had already taken place in 1864 by a revolutionist, and then in 1879 by a former student. However, the attempt in 1879 was a lot more brutal - the student firing a revolver 5 times, Alexander narrowly escaping; so it could be said that there was a growing hatred for Alexander.

  1. The Roles of Lenin and Stalin in the Russian Revolution.

    As we enter the 1980s our century has already survived longer than the three score years and ten allotted to man. At times it has seemed that our survival has been fortunate, given that we now have the power to blow up our planet and all its history.

  2. Links between the two regimes of Lenin and Stalin.

    about by Lenin, but that it was a "the path of socialism"8, men like Trotsky whole heartedly disagree. Trotsky showed that in the process of bringing about a "sharp turn or zigzag"9 of policy, Stalin broke away from Bolshevik ideology and that "opportunism...

  1. Who Was More Important - Lenin Or Stalin?

    The October Revolution in turn, overthrew the provisional government. It was because of Lenin that they stayed outside the provisional government that enabled the Bolsheviks to seize power. By doing this, Lenin had eliminated a part of Russia's problems - the provisional government tried to carry on the war, but

  2. Who was the more important figure in Russian history Lenin or Stalin?

    He was very important as he politically changed a lot of things and made people more equal. He brought about the NEP, which strengthened the country. He also brought about the USSR, which was all the ethnic countries united together.

  1. Who do you think was the more important figure in Russian history, Lenin or ...

    These mechanics maintained the tractors and use them to plough and harvest guided by the peasants.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    Another clear difference is that Lenin was committed to one-party rule, but, unlike Stalin, he did not ( and did not seek to ) exercise a personal dictatorship. Lenin had good political judgement, whereas Stalin couldn�t see much further from his ambitious aim of becoming more powerful without caring about

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work