• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who is to be blamed for the outbreak of the First World War?

Extracts from this document...


Michal Golebiowski, kl. II IB Who is to be blamed for the outbreak of the First World War? While talking about collective responsibility of states for the outbreak of the First World War it is necessary to mention the following faults: nationalism, economic rivalry, imperialism and colonial competition ('Tangier Incident' in 1905 and 'Agadir Crisis' in 1911), the fatalist mood of 1914, armaments, and miscalculation. Tension was heightened by the arms race. Increased armaments might have been justified in terms of defence and deterrence but had a cumulative effect. System of alliances (formation of two opposite armed camps: Triple Alliance and Triple Entente) , although many historians claim that earlier events proved that there was in fact nothing binding about it, meant, according to George Kennan, American diplomat and historian, the creation of an excessively rigid diplomatic framework, within which relatively small detonator- even a very localized conflict could produce huge explosion - a great European War. The several general staffs made their strategic plans to fit the alliance pattern, and the danger was that soldiers and civilian ministers could be locked into an irreversible sequence if it was triggered off. Mobilisation of forces had become so complex and speed was so critical that plans could not be easily changed without producing chaos. ...read more.


Britain would be therefore justified to undertake diplomatic actions leading to putting strains on German expansionist policy in order to protect her own predominance in the world, so that any movement of encircled Germany, even with a significance of a mere gesture in support of her Austro- Hungarian allies in military actions in the Balkans, must have ended with war waged against her two greatest neighbours: Russia and France. By isolating Germany and sending inconsistent signals, Britain was also at least partially responsible for wrong conclusions, relating to a probable scale of European conflict that was to break out, of the German leaders. In 1961 a German historian, Fritz Fischer in his book "German Aims in the First World War" argued that Germany had to bear the main responsibility for the outbreak of the war. Fischer's main theses were: 1) that the German government under the Kaiser's direction deemed a European war inevitable, prepared for war, and decided to seize the next opportunity to start it. Fischer points out the expansive aims of the industry and Junkers; 2) that the German government and general staff precipitated an escalation of the Austro-Serb crisis in order to launch what they considered a preventive strike against Russia and France. Germany, after her failure in taking control over Morocco, might have come to feel that she could expand her overseas empire only after she had destroyed the European Balance of Powers. ...read more.


Herwig, the editors of a collection of essays "The Origins of World War I" (2002), accept the opinion that ultimate responsibility for war rests with Germany and that her outbreak was deliberately provoked by German leaders. However, particularly in the light of aggressive Austro-Hungarian moves and misleading diplomacy of Great Britain it would be wrong to blame Germany alone. The more closely we study the origins of the war the more clearly the general truth emerges that no state was entirely free from blame. All had their national policies and ambitions which could not but clash fatally some day. For many of the states, to be sure, a European War might seem to hold out the possibility of achieving various desired advantages: for Serbia, the achievement of national unity for all Serbs; for Austria, the revival of her waning prestige as a Great Power, and the checking of nationalistic tendencies which threatened her very existence; for Russia, the accomplishment of her historic mission of the Slav leader; for France, the recovery of Alsace-Lorraine and the ending of the German menace; and for England, the destruction of the German naval and economical danger. Distrust between different European states was at a peak and ruling circles were dominated by the idea that war was inevitable. Each state government accused the other of aggressive intentions; each accepted the risk of a war and all of the states were not willing to abandon their conflicting interests. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent were germany to blame for the outbreak of ww1

    What's more important in my opinion is that when Russia mobilized its huge army, Germany had fear of being crushed. The Kaiser then issued an ultimatum to Russia and the following day there was a declaration of war. I can see why many historians would see countries such as Austria

  2. To What extent was German Foreign Policy responsible for the outbreak of general European ...

    1913 when it had failed to support the Serbians and to do so again would destroy its credibility and its position as a 'great power'. The Tsar had originally ordered partial mobilisation against Austria but by doing this he left Russia exposed to attack from Austria's ally Germany.

  1. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    In 1942 Clement Attlee, the deputy prime minister, said that: The work that women are performing in munitions factories has to be seen to be believed. Precision engineering, which a few years ago would have made a skilled turner's hair stand on end is now performed with dead accuracy by girls with no industrial experience.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    At first the Italians faced considerable opposition, as the Abyssinians avoided a pitched battle and retreated slowly. * The situation changed, however, in early 1936, Mussolini ordered the use of poison gas. Italian air power also began to tell and this led to the collapse of the Abyssinian forces.

  1. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    In 1948, the USA launched the Marshall Plan, a $13 billion program designed to rebuild post-war Western Europe. The Plan proposed massive economic aid and 16 countries subsequently borrowed money from the USA. The money played a vital role in the Cold War, as it not only rebuilt Western Europe, but heightened tensions dramatically and further divided the superpowers.

  2. To What extent was the German Government responsible for the outbreak of the First ...

    to introduce aggression in otherwise peaceful situations, and escalate local disagreements into continental conflicts. Similarly, the Triple Entente developed as a defensive Franco-Russian partnership to counter the Triple Alliance developing amidst Germany's expanding Armed Forces. France's geographical position meant that it could provide useful protection for the Balkans that both

  1. Why And How Did Britain Survive The War From 1940-1943

    After the sinking of The Graf Spee the German fleet was weakened and so a new plan had to be used. U-boats were utilised in a policy of unrestricted warfare in which all ships were liable to be sunk. By 1940, following his success on land, new bases could be

  2. Account for the tensions between the Islamic World and the West

    A prime example of the double standards of the West is Tony Blair's reply when questioned on the Saudi treatment on women and religious minorities. Blair remarks, "I'm not going to get into the business of attacking the Saudi system."(Time/2001:43)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work