• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who is to be blamed for the outbreak of the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Michal Golebiowski, kl. II IB Who is to be blamed for the outbreak of the First World War? While talking about collective responsibility of states for the outbreak of the First World War it is necessary to mention the following faults: nationalism, economic rivalry, imperialism and colonial competition ('Tangier Incident' in 1905 and 'Agadir Crisis' in 1911), the fatalist mood of 1914, armaments, and miscalculation. Tension was heightened by the arms race. Increased armaments might have been justified in terms of defence and deterrence but had a cumulative effect. System of alliances (formation of two opposite armed camps: Triple Alliance and Triple Entente) , although many historians claim that earlier events proved that there was in fact nothing binding about it, meant, according to George Kennan, American diplomat and historian, the creation of an excessively rigid diplomatic framework, within which relatively small detonator- even a very localized conflict could produce huge explosion - a great European War. The several general staffs made their strategic plans to fit the alliance pattern, and the danger was that soldiers and civilian ministers could be locked into an irreversible sequence if it was triggered off. Mobilisation of forces had become so complex and speed was so critical that plans could not be easily changed without producing chaos. ...read more.

Middle

Britain would be therefore justified to undertake diplomatic actions leading to putting strains on German expansionist policy in order to protect her own predominance in the world, so that any movement of encircled Germany, even with a significance of a mere gesture in support of her Austro- Hungarian allies in military actions in the Balkans, must have ended with war waged against her two greatest neighbours: Russia and France. By isolating Germany and sending inconsistent signals, Britain was also at least partially responsible for wrong conclusions, relating to a probable scale of European conflict that was to break out, of the German leaders. In 1961 a German historian, Fritz Fischer in his book "German Aims in the First World War" argued that Germany had to bear the main responsibility for the outbreak of the war. Fischer's main theses were: 1) that the German government under the Kaiser's direction deemed a European war inevitable, prepared for war, and decided to seize the next opportunity to start it. Fischer points out the expansive aims of the industry and Junkers; 2) that the German government and general staff precipitated an escalation of the Austro-Serb crisis in order to launch what they considered a preventive strike against Russia and France. Germany, after her failure in taking control over Morocco, might have come to feel that she could expand her overseas empire only after she had destroyed the European Balance of Powers. ...read more.

Conclusion

Herwig, the editors of a collection of essays "The Origins of World War I" (2002), accept the opinion that ultimate responsibility for war rests with Germany and that her outbreak was deliberately provoked by German leaders. However, particularly in the light of aggressive Austro-Hungarian moves and misleading diplomacy of Great Britain it would be wrong to blame Germany alone. The more closely we study the origins of the war the more clearly the general truth emerges that no state was entirely free from blame. All had their national policies and ambitions which could not but clash fatally some day. For many of the states, to be sure, a European War might seem to hold out the possibility of achieving various desired advantages: for Serbia, the achievement of national unity for all Serbs; for Austria, the revival of her waning prestige as a Great Power, and the checking of nationalistic tendencies which threatened her very existence; for Russia, the accomplishment of her historic mission of the Slav leader; for France, the recovery of Alsace-Lorraine and the ending of the German menace; and for England, the destruction of the German naval and economical danger. Distrust between different European states was at a peak and ruling circles were dominated by the idea that war was inevitable. Each state government accused the other of aggressive intentions; each accepted the risk of a war and all of the states were not willing to abandon their conflicting interests. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent were germany to blame for the outbreak of ww1

    the pretext for a settlement of accounts with Serbia" in other words they were prepared for War. Germany was very quick to agree with a hope that it would wipe out Slav nationalism. Germany even gave Austria a "blank Cheque" in which she agreed to back Austria Hungary with no exceptions in handling Serbia.

  2. To What extent was German Foreign Policy responsible for the outbreak of general European ...

    Russia did on the other hand have little choice. It saw itself as the leader of the Slavic peoples and felt that it had to protect Serbia from Austrian aggression as it had promised to do so in 1908. Furthermore Russia had to save face because of the events of

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    At first the Italians faced considerable opposition, as the Abyssinians avoided a pitched battle and retreated slowly. * The situation changed, however, in early 1936, Mussolini ordered the use of poison gas. Italian air power also began to tell and this led to the collapse of the Abyssinian forces.

  2. An Investigation Into the Way in Which Sir Winston Churchill Used Rhetoric During the ...

    Aristotle said "We believe good men more fully and more readily than others..." . By this time, Churchill's credibility had been established on both sides of the Atlantic. In this speech, Churchill uses the phrase of "Facing the Facts" to convince his audience that the United States should follow his strategies.

  1. Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill Focusing on his Political Career

    When French were unable to stand the assault of the German forces, they requested Churchill to send fighter squadrons to help them. In one of the hardest decisions of World War II he turned the request of the French down in order to preserve the planes for Britain's own defence.

  2. To What extent was the German Government responsible for the outbreak of the First ...

    This reinforces the claim that Alliances escalated small conflicts into world-wide competition. Historians suggest that alliances made violence almost inevitable and comment that without them, international squabbles would never have led to such a catastrophic war. For instance Germany's aggression in Morocco was an attempt to display Germany as a more necessary and influential ally than Britain.

  1. Why And How Did Britain Survive The War From 1940-1943

    built in Norway and France and because of this two and a half million tons of merchant shipping were sunk. The Allies started grouping their ships into convoys hoping that there would be safety in numbers but this did not improve the situation with even more merchant ships being sunk because of the large number of U-boats.

  2. Account for the tensions between the Islamic World and the West

    The question of modernisation is a much-contested concept within the Islamic world and has sparked different reactions. One reaction supports the imitation of the West, accepting modernization and Westernisation as indispensable. It aims to replace Islamic culture and lifestyle, including the economic and political systems, with Western ones.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work