• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who was to blame for the war: Charles I or Parliament.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

11/2/2001 Prasshy.S Who was to blame for the war: Charles I or Parliament This essay consists of the causes of the Civil War and who was to blame for the war. In August 22nd, 1642 King Charles I declared war against his enemies in parliament. Many people were surprised, as they did not realize feelings were so bad and people had no idea that war was on its way. To identify that war could have been caused by either Charles or Parliament, we must look at the (causes) events that were before the declaration of war. Both Parliament and Charles would trigger these. However, who was responsible for the death of so many who fought for each side, which caused the Civil War? Charles I made many mistakes that caused the civil war or triggered the war. Charles' reign did not start well as like his father, James I, he believed in the Divine Right of Kings. This, a political cause was not supported by parliament as most MP's wanted more influence in the ruling of the country. Charles also didn't help matter when in 1625 he married a French Catholic princess, Henrietta Maria. ...read more.

Middle

Other changes were to the position of the altar. The altar was separated from the people and a railing was put. This was to give more respect to the Church. However, some people saw it as getting pushed away from the Church. The plans of the Churches show the difference is where the altar was put. Other ways in which Puritan attacked the Church was by giving out pamphlets, attacking the Church. This showing that Charles was cutting down the tree of religion; hope, faith, charity and good luck. This obviously triggered the war as the Puritans were not used to the changes that were being made. They believed that Catholicism was being brought back. This angered them, as they believed in simple worship. Other problems throughout Scotland and England were occurring as the new prayer book was being introduced in 1637. This was a big mistake as it created furious people. The Scottish religious beliefs were based on simple worships (puritans). The English prayer book was to Catholicism for the Scottish. This was not helped when Charles forced it and told them what to do. Their reaction was rebellion. ...read more.

Conclusion

These demands were the beginning of demands that Parliament would make. These demands caused the civil war, as these were demands to make Parliament have power. Once again Parliament wanted more power. This was the nineteen propositions in June 1642. Some people thought they went too far as they asked for total power. This separated the kings' supporters and opponents. Charles thought this was the lost straw. After many disagreements throughout the year's things came to climax and civil war broke out, armies were gathered, brother fought brother, cousin fought cousin and father fought son. Looking at the evidence, my decision is that Charles was most to blame. As he brought about many changes that were mistaken. However, there is always two sides to an argument. So both were to blame but Charles was more. He brought taxes to extortion, he changed the religious ways so people thought he was bringing back Catholicism, and Protestants thought they were going to be executed, like people in Ireland. He let Parliament have no say in the matter and was obvious to their advice, which mostly was advice for people who believed in Protestantism. Civil War was not inevitable if Charles had not done what he did and had given more power and better decisions-civil war would not have happened. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

The author covers the key events leading to civil war here and stays focused on the question throughout. There is some good detail in places and a conclusion is reached. At times, the answer could be improved through better grammar and structure. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 16/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why did Parliament win the First Civil War?

    The Scots wanted something in return, a religious conformity with the Presbyterian Church in Scotland but Pym agreed to this as he did not expect to carry out this part of the agreement anyway as he knew that this sort of settlement would be hugely unpopular.

  2. What problems did Elizabeth I face at the begining of her reign?

    This left Elizabeth with several options of what to do in order to diffuse the situation and who to ally with afterwards. The easiest way in which to make peace with France was by accepting the loss of Calais. Following this Elizabeth would need to decide who to ally with; France or Spain.

  1. Why did King Charles I Resort to Personal Rule in 1629?

    In most notably France, but also in other ancient European Sovereignties, the increasing power of parliament had lead the monarch in power to put a stop to the more democratic approach by completing dissolving parliaments, and reverting to Royal absolutism.

  2. What Caused The English Civil War ?

    Parliament thought that Charles I should be setting better examples to his people by spending his money on things that were needed. This caused general money problems which were reflected in the political area. In 1629 Charles locked MPs out of Parliament for 11yrs.

  1. Henry VII and His Money.

    In The Prince, Machiavelli argues that for a ruler the only 'good' is to strengthen his throne and his kingdom. Conventional notions of what is morally good or bad, honest or dishonest, he says are irrelevant to the ruler. By Machiavelli's standards, then, Henry VII would be considered an almost

  2. Asses the most important factors that led to David Lloyd George(TM)s downfall in 1922

    So although his intentions were good, the violence caused in Ireland by LG's treaty, was undoubtedly one of the major factors that led to his downfall. The Chanak Crisis, which coincided with the situation in Ireland, was the final straw for many Tory MP's regarding LG.

  1. The causes of the English civil war.

    The unrest continued in Scotland, and when Charles discovered that they had been plotting with the French he again decided to mount a military expedition. This time, Charles called Parliament in order to get funds (1640). The second cause was the financial quarrels between the king and parliament.

  2. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    In response to the parliamentary laws, Catholics saw their chances of respect and equal rights disappearing. A Catholic faction attempted to elect Sir Edward Harewell in the 1604 elections. Realising the potential threat of a Catholic seat in parliament, other candidates placed an armed guard on the gates of the courthouse, preventing Harewell from being elected.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work