• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who would be the next Lenin?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Ramon Diez-Canedo 20th Century History February 26, 2003 The Power Struggle in Russia during the Interwar period Essay Questions 1. Who would be the next Lenin? After Lenin's death in 1924, the Russian population was left without a specific figurehead, but more importantly, the Bolsheviks were left without direct leadership. Lenin began to foresee his death several years before it happened, and so he published a document known as the 'Testament'. In this document, Lenin praised several of the then current Bolshevik leaders, especially Trotsky. However, Lenin also criticized Stalin, to a pretty high degree. This document never really triggered the effects it was meant to (get rid of Stalin), and so the Bolshevik throne was left wide open for the taking. However, the road to this throne was nothing less than a series of fierce and ruthless political battles, known as the Power Struggle. The Power Struggle consisted of four distinct phases. Phase one saw Stalin, Kamanev and Zinoviev join forces to become the 'Triumvirate'. It is important to realize that at this stage, Stalin was definitely not considered to be the dominant contender for the Communist Party (Bolshevik) ...read more.

Middle

To begin with, Stalin was General Secretary. This gave him the power to promote people however he wanted. Being the dirty politician that he was, he promoted only his supporters, and this lead to a vast number of the people in the Russian government being supporters of Stalin. Stalin was also heavily favored by the population. He blatantly praised Lenin, something that pleased the Russians very much so. He even tricked Trotsky into missing Lenin's funeral (by giving him the wrong date, according to Trotsky), while he made it certain everyone knew he himself was there, when Trotsky was not, which made him look good in front of the Russians. Stalin also knew his abilities and limitations. He never participated in ideological debates, and seeing as how he was not as intellectually gifted as his contenders, this was a smart move. Many of the strategies that Stalin implemented also helped him. In particular, factionalism helped him tremendously. It basically gave him an excuse to eliminate any possible opposition in a seemingly legal fashion. Using the methods explained above, Stalin was able to completely eradicate his competition and become the new Lenin. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin made public many statistics, such as how much pig iron was supposedly to be produced in tons, and many different figures. Stalin's goal was to make Russia make the progress of 50 to 100 years in 10. Obviously, this was absurdly unrealistic, so it was not achieved. Stalin constantly kept on pushing the goals of production, which goes to show the immense effort he was putting in to modernize Russia. This was all good, it helped Russia to become the power house it was during the 20th century, but it did take its tolls, and extremely large tolls they were. Collectivization was the main culprit, after Stalin that is. All the food was taken away from the peasants, so many starved. Those peasants that were wealthier as a cause of the NEP, were attacked by Stalin, and deported to Siberia where millions died. Harsh laws were implemented by Koba, so basically anyone could be found guilty of something. Eating food would most likely have sent you straight to prison, seeing as how the only food there was belonged to the government, so you would be charged with stealing. Millions of people died unfairly due to collectivization and industrialization, and this definitely cannot be compensated by the advantages, which would only be seen in the long run. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    It was, after all, the acts of the insurgent masses which brought about the revolution in the first place. The attitude of the soldiers to the Provisional government was of vital importance to the concept of dual power. The soldiers, because they failed to put down the insurgent masses, in a sense, turned the insurgency into a full scale revolution.

  2. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    There, Lenin announced the end of the provisional government and Russia became a communist country for the next seventy years. Although, it hadn't existed for very long, the overthrowing of the provisional government was a long term change. It was only a revolution, but this revolution was different, it enabled

  1. Links between the two regimes of Lenin and Stalin.

    Essentially the policy of collectivisation was a turnabout to the semi- capitalist policies of trading under the NEP. And while 'that wonderful Georgian', in changing the structure of the USSR, tried to show us that wholesale collectivisation and industrialisation did not only represent the continuation of the Bolshevik blueprints set

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    Both of them believed in Communism, Socialism and in Revolution. Evidence which proves this believe of revolution was when for example Lenin argued that there should be a second revolution due to that demanding speech he made, known as the April Theses.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work