• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who would be the next Lenin?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Ramon Diez-Canedo 20th Century History February 26, 2003 The Power Struggle in Russia during the Interwar period Essay Questions 1. Who would be the next Lenin? After Lenin's death in 1924, the Russian population was left without a specific figurehead, but more importantly, the Bolsheviks were left without direct leadership. Lenin began to foresee his death several years before it happened, and so he published a document known as the 'Testament'. In this document, Lenin praised several of the then current Bolshevik leaders, especially Trotsky. However, Lenin also criticized Stalin, to a pretty high degree. This document never really triggered the effects it was meant to (get rid of Stalin), and so the Bolshevik throne was left wide open for the taking. However, the road to this throne was nothing less than a series of fierce and ruthless political battles, known as the Power Struggle. The Power Struggle consisted of four distinct phases. Phase one saw Stalin, Kamanev and Zinoviev join forces to become the 'Triumvirate'. It is important to realize that at this stage, Stalin was definitely not considered to be the dominant contender for the Communist Party (Bolshevik) ...read more.

Middle

To begin with, Stalin was General Secretary. This gave him the power to promote people however he wanted. Being the dirty politician that he was, he promoted only his supporters, and this lead to a vast number of the people in the Russian government being supporters of Stalin. Stalin was also heavily favored by the population. He blatantly praised Lenin, something that pleased the Russians very much so. He even tricked Trotsky into missing Lenin's funeral (by giving him the wrong date, according to Trotsky), while he made it certain everyone knew he himself was there, when Trotsky was not, which made him look good in front of the Russians. Stalin also knew his abilities and limitations. He never participated in ideological debates, and seeing as how he was not as intellectually gifted as his contenders, this was a smart move. Many of the strategies that Stalin implemented also helped him. In particular, factionalism helped him tremendously. It basically gave him an excuse to eliminate any possible opposition in a seemingly legal fashion. Using the methods explained above, Stalin was able to completely eradicate his competition and become the new Lenin. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin made public many statistics, such as how much pig iron was supposedly to be produced in tons, and many different figures. Stalin's goal was to make Russia make the progress of 50 to 100 years in 10. Obviously, this was absurdly unrealistic, so it was not achieved. Stalin constantly kept on pushing the goals of production, which goes to show the immense effort he was putting in to modernize Russia. This was all good, it helped Russia to become the power house it was during the 20th century, but it did take its tolls, and extremely large tolls they were. Collectivization was the main culprit, after Stalin that is. All the food was taken away from the peasants, so many starved. Those peasants that were wealthier as a cause of the NEP, were attacked by Stalin, and deported to Siberia where millions died. Harsh laws were implemented by Koba, so basically anyone could be found guilty of something. Eating food would most likely have sent you straight to prison, seeing as how the only food there was belonged to the government, so you would be charged with stealing. Millions of people died unfairly due to collectivization and industrialization, and this definitely cannot be compensated by the advantages, which would only be seen in the long run. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    This is where the basis of dual power came from. The Provisional government had inherent structural weaknesses. The most fundamental, it can be argued, is that of legitimacy. The Provisional government had simply assumed power when the Russian monarchy fell, and was not voted upon by the people of Russia.

  2. .Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin and Stalin had many ...

    It was vital to increase the food supplies to workers in the towns and cities or the Five-Year Plans wouldn't succeed. Small-scale peasant farming was inefficient. Stalin forced peasants to collectivise (land was pooled together). The peasants resisted this change, so Stalin decided to use force.

  1. Links between the two regimes of Lenin and Stalin.

    For him the break in policy was not as disastrous as later historians would see it. But he does believe that behind Stalin "were tramping the myriads of weary bleeding Russian feet."21 To Deutscher's optimistic conclusion the intentionalists replied that collectivisation was not useful and only damaged Russia.

  2. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    This led to the abdication of the Tsar, he had been overthrown and the Russian monarchy was finished. When Vladimir Lenin heard of the Tsars abdication he returned to Petrograd in autumn 1917 from exile in Switzerland. Lenin was the leader of the Bolsheviks, he wanted another revolution, he was

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work