• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did a stalemate develop on the western front?

Extracts from this document...


Charlie Longuehaye 10DA History coursework- WW1 Why did a stalemate develop on the western front? A stalemate is when two forces meet and neither side can advance any further, all they can do is dig in and hold their ground. In the context of world war 1 it was when the French and German sides dug in extreamly well designed trenches stretching over 400 miles from English channel all the across to the Swiss border, creating a very much defence based war. There are four main reasons why a stalemate occurred on the western front. The first being the failure of the 'Schlieffen plan', when the Schlieffen plan failed as a result of a few wrong turns from the ...read more.


on the outside of the advance delayed their advance and headed south through fear of isolation from the rest of the attack, this took them toward the River Marne where a huge battle took place resulting in the Germans being pushed back to the rine where they dug in. the battle also produced many casualties and the final part of the failure of the Schlieffen plan. The third reason for the development of the deadlock on the western front is hat's historically known as 'the race to the sea', this was when both sides dug in trenches but whilst doing so tried going around each others defences (they both tried to outflank each other) ...read more.


Technology in the war was also very defensive, with machine guns, barbed wire and artillery it was difficult for an infantry to advance and capture trenches and then hold it afterward without sustaining very high casualties, planes and tanks were around but still very much in their infancy and were considered unreliable. Overall there is no single definite reason for the event of the stalemate on the western front during ww1, in fact there were many different factors that all played a role in causing the dead lock between forces. No one single reason can be deemed more important than the other since they all relied and depended on each other to affect ww1's infamous western front standstill in 1916. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    In his speech Haig says that it, 'All went according to plan', however as historians we know it didn't; thousands of men were killed by machine guns as tried to cut the wire. Source C can be trusted because it's an eye witness account; written by a man who was actually at the battle and knows what happened.

  2. The First World War - questions and answers on the Schlieffen plan, and the ...

    Gas was used for the first time in 1915 alongside tanks though neither of these had any major effect in any breakthroughs. In April 1917, the USA had declared war on Germany, due to the Germans sinking four US ships and the Zimmerman Telegraph being discovered.

  1. Account for the development of stalemate on the Western Front by the end of ...

    Rapid-fire machine guns made "over-the-top" offensives into death sentences for all soldiers involved and the immobility of the front made battles effectively pointless. By the end of 1914, which saw the development of the stalemate, Lord Horatio Kitchener could see the faults of this traditional trench warfare in saying, "I don't know what is to be done- this isn't war".

  2. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front

    Battle of Mons The battle of Mons was the first Major battle of the first world war and also it was the first battle with the technology/weapons available like the: * Machine Gun * And Enfield Rifle These Weapons were designed to slaughter a greater amount of soldiers and quicker

  1. American History.

    - So, by 1782, what had seemed to be a distant dream a few years earlier had become reality [I had to end this with one of those corny type sayings, just like the textbook - sorry]. From the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution (1776 - 1789)

  2. Why did Stalemate develop on the western front?

    They were now fighting a war on two fronts. Another reason why Stalemate developed on the western front was because the British and Russian troops arrived at the battle of Marne. Germany invaded Belgium in August 1914. The battle of the Marne was between August and September; the Germans advanced

  1. Why did stalemate develop on the Western Front?

    Machine guns, the staple weapon for any modern army, had been surprisingly dismissed by both the French and the British - classed by them as unlikely to have any effect.

  2. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front?

    Going through Belgium also meant that the army would come closer to Paris, the capital of France. The plan was to go to Paris from Belgium and then go back towards Germany and take out the French army that was launching a counter attack.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work