• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did a stalemate develop on the western front?

Extracts from this document...


Charlie Longuehaye 10DA History coursework- WW1 Why did a stalemate develop on the western front? A stalemate is when two forces meet and neither side can advance any further, all they can do is dig in and hold their ground. In the context of world war 1 it was when the French and German sides dug in extreamly well designed trenches stretching over 400 miles from English channel all the across to the Swiss border, creating a very much defence based war. There are four main reasons why a stalemate occurred on the western front. The first being the failure of the 'Schlieffen plan', when the Schlieffen plan failed as a result of a few wrong turns from the ...read more.


on the outside of the advance delayed their advance and headed south through fear of isolation from the rest of the attack, this took them toward the River Marne where a huge battle took place resulting in the Germans being pushed back to the rine where they dug in. the battle also produced many casualties and the final part of the failure of the Schlieffen plan. The third reason for the development of the deadlock on the western front is hat's historically known as 'the race to the sea', this was when both sides dug in trenches but whilst doing so tried going around each others defences (they both tried to outflank each other) ...read more.


Technology in the war was also very defensive, with machine guns, barbed wire and artillery it was difficult for an infantry to advance and capture trenches and then hold it afterward without sustaining very high casualties, planes and tanks were around but still very much in their infancy and were considered unreliable. Overall there is no single definite reason for the event of the stalemate on the western front during ww1, in fact there were many different factors that all played a role in causing the dead lock between forces. No one single reason can be deemed more important than the other since they all relied and depended on each other to affect ww1's infamous western front standstill in 1916. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    In his speech Haig says that it, 'All went according to plan', however as historians we know it didn't; thousands of men were killed by machine guns as tried to cut the wire. Source C can be trusted because it's an eye witness account; written by a man who was actually at the battle and knows what happened.

  2. Why did Stalemate develop on the western front?

    The Germans lines of supplies were too long and overstretched so the German troops didn't have the equipment and the food that they desperately needed. So they had to wait for the supplies to catch up with them. This meant that the vital speed advantage was lost.

  1. American History.

    by urging the Texans to seize all the land to the Rio Grande. - When Mexico argued about the border, Polk sent troops under General Zachary Taylor ["Old Rough and Ready"] to Rio Grande in 1846. Since he really wanted CA, he tried to buy it as a last resort.

  2. The failure of the Schlieffen Plan - Stalemate.

    most sustained battle of WWI. French suffered over 400,000 casualties, Germans 350,000. * General von Falkenhayn, chief of German General Staff: to 'bleed France White' * national sentiment would force the French to 'throw in every man they had'. * Germans suffered loss of morale; late June: advance ground to a halt & Somme - Verdun never fell.

  1. Account for the development of stalemate on the Western Front by the end of ...

    The armies of the Great Powers lacked the understanding and appreciation of developments in new technology. In underestimating the power of aviation and instead relying on trains, horses and marching, troops, ammunition and supplies were transferred at a much slower pace and the enemy could plug offensive strategies in time, allowing for a virtual standstill between the armies.

  2. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front

    The Belgium soldiers fought much harder and with much more bravery than expected which slowed down the Germans and also created time for the British BEF to get across the channel to join France for the start or "The Battle Of Mons".

  1. The First World War - questions and answers on the Schlieffen plan, and the ...

    Other weapons were grenades, mines, the tank from 1916, the machine gun and aircraft development for reconnaissance and attack. In addition, British Officers were specialised in Cavalry, of whom kept a large quantity of cavalry in the reserve trenches; these tactics failed against the modern technology.

  2. Why did stalemate develop on the Western Front?

    Possibly -"[The leader with] fewer mistakes will win." as quite frankly mistakes were as common as men falling in "No man's land". Maybe i am stacking too much blame upon them, maybe they were just mediocre men thrust into a situation that overwhelmed them and after all they were only human.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work