• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Did A Stalemate Develop on the Western Front?

Extracts from this document...


Emily Grant History Coursework Part 2 Why Did A Stalemate Develop on the Western Front? When the war began in 1914, it was greeted largely with enthusiasm and excitement. General public opinion was that it would be a quick war; it was common to hear people saying it would be 'over by Christmas'. However, when Christmas 1914 arrived, the war was far from over. In fact, both sides had 'dug in' for winter, and there were no signs of the quick and easy victory that each party had expected. There are a number of reasons why stalemate developed on the Western Front in October 1914, and none of these reasons could stand alone as the main cause of the stalemate. There were many contributing factors, overall playing a part in the failure of the Schlieffen Plan, which had intended a quick victory for Germany, and definitely no stalemate. Firstly, Germany had planned to invade France through neutral Belgium, with the idea that Belgium would offer no resistance. ...read more.


This meant that Germany was working well behind schedule, which delay had allowed Britain and France time to mobilise, its attack was greatly weakened, and the Schlieffen Plan was beginning to fall apart. France had previously planned a counter-attack, Plan XVII. This had completely failed and France suffered losses of over 200000 men in just 12 days. However, this meant that they regrouped forced more quickly (than if they had continued with Plan XVII) in order to defend Paris, now with the help of the British forces. This was something that the German's hadn't planned for; they had expected to be able to take Paris quickly and without any significant resistance from the French. Now, Germany had been delayed, allowing France more time to prepare; Germany had lost a lot of its troops to fighting Russia, and France also had the assistance of Britain. All of these factors contributed largely to the resulting stalemate at the end of 1914. The issue of German supply lines also affected the attack on France. ...read more.


Germany took Ostend and Antwerp on the 8th of October, but the Allies recaptured Ypres in Belgium on the 18th of October in the first Battle of Ypres, and the other Channel Ports were safe in Allied hands. The race for the sea was over and both sides dug in, in trenches that spanned 470 kilometres. It was a stalemate. Both sides were dug into trenches protected by machine guns, only metres apart in some places. Germany's Schlieffen Plan had failed spectacularly. In conclusion, stalemate had a number of causes; the resistance from Belgium and the involvement of the British, which delayed Germany's attack; the quick mobilisation of the Russian forces and the bad German supply lines which weakened Germany's attack; the French defence of Paris, which diverted Germany's attack; French losses in Plan XVII, without which France may have been strong enough to defeat Germany; and the Battle of the Marne, where both sides failed to defeat the other. The public had been wrong, and the war was not over by Christmas. Both sides had suffered great casualties and loss of forces, and trench warfare had begun. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    The first source shows that Haig does not care about his men; he says that, 'The nation must be taught to bear losses', which basically means that the war can't be won without losses and the nation need to get used to this.

  2. To what extent did the failure of the Schlieffen Plan cause Germany's defeat on ...

    for Germany but failed due to being executed badly and having important flaws that weren't addressed. In the case of the Schlieffen Plan it was the list of assumptions that didn't materialize and in the Ludendorff Offensive it was that the attack wasn't concentrated on one important section of the lines.

  1. The failure of the Schlieffen Plan - Stalemate.

    * 300-Day battle destroyed French reserves & left French too weak for a resolute offensive. * French counter-attacks from 23 October onwards recovered most wasteland overrun by Germans. ? Verdun was a triumph for French fortitude & generalship of Mangin, Nivelle, and Petain.

  2. Why did Stalemate develop on the western front?

    This meant that the vital speed advantage was lost. Also the Race to the Sea also caused Stalemate. The battle of the Marne was a turning point, the Schlieffen Plan had failed. Germany was caught up in a two front war, worse still, the German general realise that they could not break through the enemy lines.

  1. Armed forces.

    the passing of an era and why it inspires so many more to be fascinated and interested in this area of British history. Communications The telegraph system was one of the technological wonders of the nineteenth century. It transformed communications in a profound way and helped to give the British Army a technological superiority over most of her competitors.

  2. Account for the development of stalemate on the Western Front by the end of ...

    Moltke's faults would come to an end on September 14 when he suffered a nervous breakdown and was replaced by General Erich von Falkenhayn, described by historian John Terraine as "a man of decided ideas who possessed the nerve which von Moltke had conspicuously lacked".

  1. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front

    Battle of Mons The battle of Mons was the first Major battle of the first world war and also it was the first battle with the technology/weapons available like the: * Machine Gun * And Enfield Rifle These Weapons were designed to slaughter a greater amount of soldiers and quicker

  2. To what extent did the failure of the Schlieffen Plan lead to Germany's defeat ...

    The Austrians, however, were not going so well. They were defeated due to a lack of coordination between the Austrian and German armies, the first of which had no idea about the Schlieffen plan or the Germans intentions to invade France.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work