• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The countries war plans There were many reasons for a stalemate developing on the Western front which I am going to discuss, the first was that each country had their own war plans in which each one had weaknesses. The first war plan I am going to look at is Germanys SCHLEFFEN PLAN; this plan was to march to France and defeat them in a matter of 6 weeks and then would be able to turn their attention to Russia. The problem facing German commanders was that if a war broke out they would have to fight Russia and France at the same time this is known as a Two Front War. This plan relied on the Russian army being slow to mobilise which Germany was adamant they would be. The next plan I'm going to look at is Britain's; Britain's plan was to set up and ready the BEF (British expeditionary force) and to travel across the channel to France on short notice. Yet they would not last too long with only a small army of 150,000 and they also had to make it across the channel without alerting any enemy boats e.t.c. ...read more.

Middle

Battle of Marne After the battle of Mons the BEF and the French were in retreat and retreated all the way back to the river Marne but the German army also had problems the Russians had mobilised much quicker than expected and already invaded Germany so the German supreme commander Moltke had to pull out 100,000 troops from the army advancing onto France and the British to go back and hold off the Russians yet still this was not all the problems, during the quick advance food or ammunition was not able to keep up so the German troops was forced to leave most of it behind were which left the German soldiers hungry and exhausted. As the German army was still advancing French troops were rushed to Paris by anyhow possible even public taxis were used, The BEF and the French were able to stop the German advance but neither side could make any Major progress by 8th September both sides had to result in digging trenches to protect themselves from snipers and shell fire. The Schlieffen plan had now failed. Up to this point it had been an all moving war but now both sides had taken up more defensive tactics and this was the first sign of the stalemate developing. ...read more.

Conclusion

Conclusion . The main reason I believe why the stalemate developed was because of all the war plans having weaknesses and that no country could make a decisive break through and get the upper hand. There was also many other reasons like: * The equal abilities of the Germans and the British and the French so no-one could tower over the other countries and take charge. * The flat land of northern France which enabled soldiers to be able to see an enemy coming from miles away, making it easier to fire at them from further away. * The new technology like the Enfield rifle and the machine gun. The machine gun was underestimated until it was put into use, this weapon would make it a lot easier to defend your trench if enemy soldiers went "over the top". * And the last and most I think least effective tactic of the first world war was the "over the top" routine this is where soldiers would climb out of there trenches onto no-mans land trying to get into enemy trenches, but most of the soldiers who ever tried this would have been no doubtfully slaughtered going across no-mans land most likely by the enemy machine guns. ?? ?? ?? ?? Why did a stalemate develop on the Western front? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    However, I believe that the American entry into the war played the biggest part of all because the vast supplies of manpower and material were now available for the Allies to draw upon. The stalemate had been going on for a year and a half and no one had won,

  2. To what extent did the failure of the Schlieffen Plan cause Germany's defeat on ...

    This high rate of success meant that Britain could continue in the war. The U-boat campaign also gave the British public a sense of unity and raised morale on the home front in a similar way to the air raids in the Second World War.

  1. The First World War - questions and answers on the Schlieffen plan, and the ...

    Many men lost their life's due to the horrific conditions of the battle fields as many men drown in the mud, mainly due to the 20kilograms of equipment they had to carry. Furthermore, a new regulation was made so that if a man fell in danger his fellow troops were not allowed to save him.

  2. To what extent did the Schlieffen plan cause Germany's defeat on the western front?

    Germany's resistance in a long war was centred on its one masterstroke, the U-Boat campaign. Britain had forever been an 'Island fortress.' This made it very difficult to attack, due to its excellent navy and partly because of the 21-mile minimum 'moat.'

  1. Account for the development of stalemate on the Western Front by the end of ...

    invading Belgium, assumed that Russia would not mobilise for at least six weeks, inadequately protected the Eastern Front and did not take in to account human misfortunes which would alter the strict timetable structure of the Plan. These faults meant that the plan was extremely inflexible and left Moltke with

  2. To what extent did the failure of the Schlieffen Plan lead to Germany's defeat ...

    This was something that the German's desperately did not want. It would involve wearing down the opposition through continual attack, which would be extremely expensive, and the production of shells would have to increase dramatically. The Germans declared the war in 1914 because they thought that if they waited any longer their plan would be practically useless.

  1. Stalemate was on the western front for many years.

    So I do agree with statement I think they all equal in the break up of stalemate. All of these points link together in one way or another. The American entry into the war was partly a result to Germany submarine attacks on American ships, and German submarine warfare was a result of the blocking of German ports.

  2. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front in 1914 ? How was ...

    wing had only three times as many troops as the left wing and since the right wing was smaller, it advanced slower than had been planned. Another reason was because there was more resistance from Belgium, British and French forces than the plan expected; this meant that the right wing

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work