• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front in 1914 ? How was this stalemate eventually broken?

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front in 1914 ? How was this stalemate eventually broken? On June 28 1914 Francis Ferdinand was killed at Sarajevo in Bosnia. He was assassinated by a Serb nationalist. Francis Ferdinand was the archduke of Austria. The killing had a domino effect and dragged countries into the argument. The groups were: Allied Powers--mainly France, Britain, Russia, Italy, and (from 1917) the U.S and the Central Powers--Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey. This war was not a normal war though. Wars traditionally before this had been fought by army's meeting at a certain place and charging, normally these war would be over in a matter of months or even days. The technology which was used in this wars would be very basic, guns which are hard to reload, artillery which could not be aimed accurately, World war one saw a change in the technology used to fight and as the war developed more and more technology was discovered. Another thing which made this war different to wars in the past, was the amount of people who were fighting. ...read more.


Both army's had a lot of money and when a gun ws destroyed there was always another waiting to replace it. The same theory applied for the men, when one died there was always another to step in. Once both sides were in the Trenches stalemate set in. One of the reasons was the lack of the super weapon. During WW2 there was the atom bomb, during WW1 there was nothing and this meant that neither side could make significant land, or kill enough enemy or their weapons. Both sides had very similar types of technology and this meant neither side had an advantage on the other. Many of the weapons which were around in 1914 were defensive weapons, which meant they could only be used to defend a position. These were weapons like barbed wire which was extremely hard to get past and was extremely hard to destroy. Artillery could not destroy it and in fact the only way it could be removed was if men went out at night and cut hole's through it for attacks later. Another weapon which made it break throughs hard and not did occur often was the machine gun. ...read more.


The attack was territorial gain but Germany had lost a lot of Soldiers. This meant that Germany was now vunrable to a counter attack. In this attack the Germany had lost many of their storm division, these were Germans key fighters. On May 7, 1915 Lusitania was sunk by a German submarine. This boat was transporting many allied forces but it was also transporting many American civilians. When this boat was sunk it outraged the American people. This put pressure on the president to go to war with Germany. U.S. entered World War I in April 1917. This gave the Allies at great advantage, the man power and the weapons would come in handy. From this moment on the morale of the Germans soldiers started to become very low. America and the allies now started to offer Germany an armistice. Ludendorff was outraged by this and he said if you don't stop negotiations he will leave, to his surprise the Kaiser accepted this and Lundendorff then went and exiled in Sweeden. The Germans liked Lundendorff tactics so this would of lowered their moral. On the 26th of may an outbreak of the Spanish flu affected nearly half a million soldiers. When things normally don't go well there is normally a revolution round the corner, this was true in this case. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    They used a range of new tactics. They used lightly armed storm troopers who moved quickly and stopped the Allies bringing forces together to resist their advances. They moved quickly through gaps in the Allied lines and came within range of shelling Paris for the first time since 1914.

  2. Why did a stalemate occur on the Western Front?

    Then Germany would turn against Russia. The plan was to advance troops in a massive 'hammer-swing' through neutral Belgium (this would require an exceptionally strong right wing, to sweep around). There would also be a small number of troops used as a hinge in case of counter-attacks.

  1. The First World War - questions and answers on the Schlieffen plan, and the ...

    Also when they advanced, taking the land, they were unable to with hold what they gained and found themselves being quickly pushed back. The German troops soon found themselves exhausted after several weeks of fighting, meaning they lost their moral and determination to win the war, resulting to many men 'faking' an injury to go home.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    The term was first used in an offer of talks made in a letter from Kennedy to Khrushchev at the end of the crisis and Khrushchev replied agreeing to talks * Both leaders had realised the dreadful consequences of a nuclear war.

  1. Account for the development of stalemate on the Western Front by the end of ...

    Rather, it provided an opportunity for the development of trench warfare and thus the long-standing stalemate on the Western Front. Plan XVII was similar to the Schlieffen Plan in that it was committed to offensive action against Germany, and had several miscalculations and assumptions.

  2. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front

    The plan I am going to discuss is Austria -Hungary's, there plan was to help Germany defeat Russia after the Germans had defeated France. The main thing wrong with this plan was that it completely relied on the success of the Schlieffen Plan.

  1. What Broke the Stalemate Stalemate is the word used to describe the situation on ...

    Another reason why it is such an important factor is it also helped to lead to a Revolution which started with the German sailors mutinying. Without the Ludendorff offensive failing I don't think that the war would have ended so quickly because during the time before the battle Germany, even with food shortages, were too strong to defeat.

  2. why a stalemate grew on the western front

    When Russia attacked, 100,000 men from the German army were sent immediately to the eastern front. This weakened the army on the Western front. This helped to create a stalemate because Germany was fighting a war on two fronts, which was the opposite of their main objective.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work