• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did a stalemate occur on the Western Front?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did a stalemate occur on the Western Front? "It was the failure of the Schlieffen Plan in 1914 that led to the creation of stalemate on the Western Front" (Webb). The German offensive; Schlieffen plan failed due to differences in the way the plan was performed compared to the way the plan was actually planned. Problems led to battles, which lead to defeats for the Germans and eventually the forced abandonment (due to failure) of the Schlieffen Plan. As the Germans were defeated they secured some land, 'dug in', the trench system was established. New technology such as the innovation of machine guns made frontal attacks very costly, resulting in the advantage to the defender. The result of these trench systems and new innovations were a very defensive war, which turned into the war of attrition, Stalemate was established. The stalemate proved to be an integral part of the warfare for the next 4 years (until 1918). The Schlieffen plan was aimed at the rapid defeat of France. ...read more.

Middle

Many errors such as these showed Moltke's lack of faith in the Schlieffen Plan. The hammer was seriously weakened as troops were removed to act as a hinge or sent to eastern front (to fight surprising rapid Russian advances). This slowed down thrust through Belgium. The success of the plan required rapid movement through Belgium. This did not occur due to the unexpected strength of the Belgium and British Expeditionary Forces (BEF) resistance and the result of three battles en route through Belgium (Mons, Le Cateau and Guise). As modifications were made, it was obvious that the plan was not unfolding as expected. The abandonment of the timetable upon which the plan was dependent was a critical factor. The reliance of the movement of soldiers by foot rather than with the speed of railways was a crucial mistake. The exhausted and injured soldiers welcomed the opportunity to 'dig in' which further reinforced the prospect of stalemate. Momentum was also lost as ammunition reserves were dropped, guns showed wear, men were tired, casualties not replaced and the destruction of railways and bridges by the British (essential to quick movement). ...read more.

Conclusion

These trenches also helped soldiers during the bitter winter. The Schlieffen plan and the 'war of movement' was over. Stalemate was established and would not be broken until 1918. The consolidated trench system secured and gave confidence to both armies defensively. Both had strong backing and resting places (esp. German elaborate trenches) and the improvements of new weapons (machine guns), frontal attacks were not often ordered due to strong defence. Neither side was able to break through the defences of the other. A stalemate developed. The Schlieffen plan's aim of rapid defeat of France proved to be unsuccessful and failures due to reasons such as modification to planned attacks, unexpected enemies and lose of momentum. It also proved to be one of the most influential factors determining not only the next four years of war and end to the 'war of movement' (until 1918) but also the eventual outcome of the war. The 'war of movement' ended when Germany was defeated in the Battle of Marne and pushed back to the River Aisne. The trench system was established, symbolising the beginning of trench warfare, and the war of attrition. A stalemate developed between Germany and the allies and lasted until 1918. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    can win the war, 'all went like a clockwork', which means everything went according to plan. In the second source he is more positive because the war went as planned. He shows his appreciation of the soldiers and cares about their feelings, 'Our troops are in wonderful spirits and full of confidence'; this shows he care about the soldiers.

  2. To what extent did the failure of the Schlieffen Plan cause Germany's defeat on ...

    This caused an outburst of anti-German feeling and America was on the brink of war. Soon after this six more American ships were sunk and Wilson declared war on the Central Powers on 6 April 1917. The Allies had improved steadily throughout the war and continued to improve under General Foch when they combined.

  1. There are four main factors which affected the final outcome of the war: the ...

    However their made impactwas in the munitions factories. Here the women were in high risk jobs which affected both their skins and their lives. Toxic chemicals turned their skin yellow and they were often labelled canaries as a consequence.

  2. To what extent did the Schlieffen plan cause Germany's defeat on the western front?

    On board this ship there were 128 American civilians who had no chance of reaching their destination. After the sinking of the Lusitania Germany called off the unrestricted submarine warfare, but started it again in 1916. By this time the Allies had improved their tactics against the U-boats as follows:

  1. Account for the development of stalemate on the Western Front by the end of ...

    Joffre's faults resulted in a quick German advance. With the French failure in Lorraine, and the German defeat of French and British forces at Charleroi and Mons, Plan XVII was in ruins. The direction of attack as set out in the plan had been completely misguided.

  2. To what extent did the failure of the Schlieffen Plan lead to Germany's defeat ...

    The British and French were not close enough to ally each other and the British hadn't had an expeditionary force. When the Germans attack was launched there was no real superior military force which meant that no one could win the war quickly; leading to the long war of attrition earlier mentioned.

  1. Stalemate was on the western front for many years.

    Now Paris was I heavy fire range. The plan had gone very well for the Germans. However the Germans lost 400,000 troops in making this advance, and they had no reserves to call on. More Americans were arriving every week and the French commander called up more French reserves.

  2. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front in 1914 ? How was ...

    Both the central powers and the allied powers set up trenches. The problem was that neither army could make significant land on the other. It was practically impossible to get past no mans land.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work