• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Britain not establish an independant Palestine jointly ruled by Arabs and Jews

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Britain not establish an independent Palestine ruled jointly by Jews and Arabs? State your answer explaining your findings and provide evidence supporting evidence. (30 marks) Britain was unable to establish an independent Palestine ruled jointly by Jews and Arabs due to varying factors that acted as obstacles. Among these were the conflicting interests of each groups concerned: the Arabs wanted independence, the Jews a national homeland and the British imperialist rule and the fact that initially Britain did not necessarily seek to establish a completely independent Palestine . Moreover other factors such as World War II shifted attention away from the attempt and garnered sympathy and support for a separate Jewish state rather than a joint one with the Arabs. Yet perhaps the main reason was unsolvable differences between Jews and Arabs. When Britain took over the mandate to govern Palestine in 1919, it did so in a compromised position by promising the Arabs independence and the Jews a homeland, this restricted its attempts to establish a jointly ruled Palestine. In the correspondence sustained by Shariff Hussein and Sir Henry McMahon, from mid 1915 to January 1916, the High Commissioner expressed that the Britain guaranteed support for Arab independence. However in the letters the issue of boundaries and limits was handled rather ambiguously , with Britain maintaining certain areas deemed vital to the interests of the empire, namely the region of Palestine. ...read more.

Middle

This and a growing sense of Palestinian nationalism meant that the Arab population was reluctant to share an independent state with Jews, when they felt the land as rightfully theirs, this meant they stubbornly refused to share it in any form. Perhaps the greatest obstacle for a joint Arab and Jew state was the hostility existent between both. Arabs were angered by an increase in Jewish immigration brought on by the 3rd aliyah between 1920 an 1924 in which over 35 000 Jews from Russia, Poland and Romania entered Palestine. These were generally well educated people with secular Zionist beliefs and socialist views , they were more intent on establishing a Jewish homeland .Land was bought from Arab landowners, many of whom were absent landlords, and farms were created with an emphasis on establishing settlements that would operate exclusively on Jewish labor. This aggravated the Arabs since Arabs who had worked the land as tenants were evicted since only Jews were employed to work. Hostilities increased and resulted in several riots that broke out in 1921 and later in 1929 as Jewish landownership and immigration increased reaching 160 000 Jews in 1929 compared to 60 000 in 1919. Tensions kept building up until finally they came to a head way in April 1936 when the Arabs rebelled. The British government seemed unable to control the situation and decided to restrict Jewish immigration which naturally enraged the Jewish Community in face of the growing anti Semitism in Europe. ...read more.

Conclusion

Furthermore the British were receiving worldwide criticism especially after the Exodus incident in 1947, in which the British authorities denied entrance to a ship carrying 4500 Jewish refugees from Europe to Palestine and was sent back to Europe. This garnered further sympathy for the Jewish community which meant that public view was in favor of a separate state for Jews rather than a joint one between Arabs and Jews. The British felt they could no longer appease either Jew, Arabs or worldwide opinion, devastated by the war, with food shortages and rationing at home it was hardly feasible to maintain troops in Palestine. In May 1948 Britain decided it would hand over its mandate of Palestine to the Unites Nations, hence it was unable to establish an independent Palestine ruled jointly by Arabs and Jews. Thus the evidence presented demonstrates that initially the British government was unwilling to establish an independent Palestine since it would jeopardize its interest in the region and had compromised its position to both Jews and Arabs with the Hussein-McMahon Letters and later with the Sykes-Picot Agreement and finally the Balfour Declaration. Furthermore the conflicting interests of Arabs and Jews, their uncompromising position and the hostility existent between the two stressed that reconciliation was practically impossible. This coupled with the British government's inability to neither cope or handle the situation proves and demonstrates the difficulty and the intractable nature of uniting in one government and state two profoundly different ,deeply passionate and antagonistic peoples. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was warfare between Britain and France the main contributory factor in ...

    3 star(s)

    the terrible winter France had endured made life for the peasant even worse. H Morse Stephens makes the point "Starving people could hardly be expected to see how the surrender of one fourth of their incomes could help them". Another reason why the agricultural system of France was so much

  2. Gandhi was instrumental in India achieving its independence. Gandhi was able to procure Indias ...

    By adding women into the equation India was able to work more efficiently and grow in numbers. Perhaps Gandhi's greatest accomplishment was his unification of the Hindu and Muslim population. Before these two cultures were unified it was almost as if India was split in two.

  1. How and why did the Bolsheviks gain power in 1917?

    Loyal men to the provisional government were sent to raise drawbridges and prevent the working class Bolshevik supporters over the river Neva from reaching the capital's inner areas. The cruiser, Aurora was left in close proximity to the city, with a ship-load of sailors who would most likely mutiny and join the Bolsheviks - unknown to Kerensky though.

  2. The First English Civil War

    The Royal Standard was taken and retaken; Sir Edmund Verney, the standard-bearer, was killed as was Lindsey in a separate mel´┐Że. By the time that Rupert returned, both sides were incapable of further effort and disillusioned as to the prospect of ending the war at a blow, so far from

  1. Assess the importance of humanitarian and missionary activity in creating a larger African Empire ...

    Chamberlains views were also mirrored in that of the public's who also felt strongly about the civilization of the Africans. Sir David Livingstone captivated public attention when he spread his view of that humanitarianism should be spread throughout Africa under the name of Britain.

  2. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    It is ?difficult to ignore the evidence of autonomous mobilisation of the peasantry?[7] and their growing resentment towards British rule, at least in northern and central India. Better communication between the territories and the rebels distinguished this from earlier peasant revolts.

  1. The events in India in 1856/7 were caused by the issue of the new ...

    A second reform which was brought in in 1829 was the outlaw of the traditional practice of sati, a cultural tradition which had been in place in India for generations. When a male warrior was killed in battle it was expected the wife of the warrior would throw herself into

  2. The Belgian Congo Before and After Independence

    In these circumstances leisurely talks are undertaken in Brussels to consider the introduction of some greater measure of local autonomy. But the pace is suddenly quickened by riots which break out in Léopoldville in January 1959. The immediate cause is the banning of a scheduled political rally.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work