• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Did Charles I resort to Personal Rule?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why Did Charles I resort to Personal Rule in 1629? King Charles I bequeathed the throne from his father, James, in the year of 1625. After just four years of rule, in 1629, the king made the extraordinary decision to order that the Commons were to end their session in parliament. This was seen as a radical choice as between the years of 1625 and 1629 Kind Charles I had called three parliaments, however decided to resort to Personal Rule on 2nd March 1629. There are 4 main theories for the breakdown in relations between parliament and Charles I. These are said to be either a fault of the Duke of Buckingham, a fault of both the House of Commons and the House of Lords, or finally a fault of King Charles I. The first theory is that the poor relations between parliament and the crown were due the Duke of Buckingham. During the 1620's, England's foreign policy was catastrophic. Within the 2 years of 1624 to 1625, the king ordered for 2 military expeditions around Europe, which disastrously failed. ...read more.

Middle

From the years of 1485 until 1603, tonnage and poundage had been voted for the every monarch at the beginning of their reign, and for every year of their reign. However, Parliament only agreed vote this for the king for the first year, in order to make the point that it was a gift from the people to Charles. This was much to Charles' disapproval as he needed the money greatly and believed that it was his right to claim as every other king before had done so. Therefore, as a result of this, Charles went ahead and collected this money without the permission of parliament. Charles did this by resorting to 'prerogative' taxation, such as the forced loan. It was financial disputes such as this which left Charles believing that it would be more beneficial for him to collect funding without the aid of parliament. However, It could be argued that this is a fault of the Parliament as they took advantage of his youth and inexperience. The house of Commons particularly tried to take away the kings royal power and wealth as they believed that they could have succeeded in doing so. ...read more.

Conclusion

This therefore was a significant factor which led to the relationship breakdown between them, thus causing Charles to resort to personal rule. A further fault of Charles' which resulted in poor relations between parliament and the Crown was that the King appeared ill-suited for kingship; Charles was not able to persuade parliament to co-operate with him. In conclusion, due to faults of the House of Commons, the House of Lords, Charles I and the Duke of Buckingham, relations between the Crown and Parliament increasingly worsened, resulting in the personal rule of Charles I. This included issues such as tonnage and poundage, the Cadiz and Mansfield Expeditions, the religious views of the Charles I and finally the impeachment of Buckingham. Considering all of these factors, I believe that the Duke of Buckingham was the most significant factor which led to the dissolving of Parliament. I believe this not only because the favouritism the king showed towards him led to his unpopularity , but also because of the ill-judged decisions the king made as a result of Buckingham, such as refuses the subsidies which parliament offered him in exchange for Buckingham's impeachment. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why Did Charles Dissolve Parliament in 1629?

    Charles was also very opinionated. He believed very strongly in the divine right of monarchs and that parliament was just there to grant him subsidies when he needed them. He also believed that actions spoke louder than words and that he didn't need to explain himself to a chamber full of 'commoners'.

  2. Was Charles I Trying to Establish Royal Absolutism during his Personal Rule?

    It is unfair to say that Arminianism in the 1630s was completely Catholic: it was not "Catholicism under another name". Rather, it was a balance between the established Church of England and Catholicism. For instance, when the later duke of Newcastle, William Cavendish, broke his horse's neck when riding on

  1. Why was there a breakdown in relationship between king and parliament in 1629?

    The king thought that it was his divine right as king to manipulate the law to his own devises. Because of the forced loans that Charles had imposed on the Gentry and Nobility of England, much support for parliament had been gained.

  2. Why did Charles I decide to dissolve parliament in 1629?

    This lack of thought and analysis of a delicate situation which he could of stepped down from or lowered his support suggests that his true objective and role as King was not met and only made situations worse for himself.

  1. Why did King Charles I Resort to Personal Rule in 1629?

    In reality, this was probably a culmination of his strong belief in the Divine Right of Kings and his lack of confidence. In his history of the period, the Earl of Clarendon cited a major reason for Charles' personality problems at "not trusting himself enough".

  2. Why by 1629 had Charles I decided to rule without Parliament?

    As a consequence prices increased, however the King's allowance did not. The first source of income came from Crown Lands, where tenants paid to live or farm there. However these lands had been hugely reduced by 1625 because of previous Monarchs predilection for selling it off for quick injections of capital.

  1. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    Charles.38 By the time Charles realized the Duke's true intentions, it was too late for Joan. She was ordered to senseless battles which she inevitably lost, consequently her reputation among her followers was compromised.39 The nobles who had feared her potential power were smug with her losses as her imperfect status caused fewer people to follow her with complete trust.

  2. One of the first political grievances that built up during the Personal Rule of ...

    It has become noticeable that there would have been no financial grievances if there were not any political, if Charles had never decided to rule on his own without Parliament. The grievances all stem from Charles not having enough money to cater for his expensive lifestyle and tastes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work