• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Disraeli pass the 1867 Second Reform Act?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Disraeli pass the 1867 Second Reform Act? The 1867 Second Reform Act was an extremely intelligent piece of politics and demonstrated how clever Disraeli was as a politician, the act itself would enable Disraeli to the gain power amongst the Commons. With the death of Palmerston in 1865 the question of Reform was immediately back on agenda. Palmerston had been such a major political figure that while he was present, reform would never be an issue in the Houses of Parliament. Within a couple of months of the Derby administration coming into power there were two days of riots in Hyde Park over the reform of Parliament, involving clashes with police and the destruction of some of the park railings. If the Conservatives wished to remain in power something needed to be done, or so Disraeli said when he made a speech to the Commons in 186 7 saying that reform needed to be passed in order to "destroy the present agitation". ...read more.

Middle

We know also that this is not entirely true as when Disraeli created the Bill he discretely placed in it an "insurance policy", although the right to vote would be given to far more voter's in potentially Liberal voting areas, they were still severely under-represented in Parliament, so the support of the working class voters was not necessary. Tory democracy was not in actual fact beneficial to the working class, indeed the only people who would benefit from it were the Conservatives themselves, this is because Tory democracy was not about helping the working class but instead, gaining there support while doing as little social reform as possible, this is shown in 1866 when the Conservatives joined forces with several right wing Liberals in putting down the Second Reform Bill, if he had really wished to improve conditions for the working class then Disraeli would not have let his rivalry with Gladstone come between him and social reform. ...read more.

Conclusion

An additional benefit to Disraeli in passing the Second Reform Act was his intense dislike of Ewart Gladstone, the rivalry between Disraeli and Gladstone had been present since the repeal of the Corn Laws in 1845, and during the 1866 Russel administration Disraeli had cleverly demolished an attempt by Gladstone to push through a Second Reform Bill. If therefore, Gladstone was able to push through a Reform Bill of his own only a year later he would be humiliating the Liberals and in particular Gladstone himself, this is a concept he called, "to dish the Whigs". Principally the reasons for Disraeli passing the 1867 Second Reform Act was to gain power for himself among the government, potentially succeeding Derby as the Prime minister. However, his stated political reasons of the time might simply have been said to justify reform amongst his own party. Aneurin Rainbird SF5 History SA ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This response offers a good range of explanations for the reform bill of 1867, with awareness of Disraeli's personal and political context shown throughout. Some explanations lacked depth and the conclusion certainly could have been developed further.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 26/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In what ways and to what extent does the concept of Spain's Golden Age ...

    5 star(s)

    The army was powerful under Charles because he fought most of his battles against the French and the Turks on land. However, the French Wars of Religion saw that Philip did not have to contend with the French army to the same extent that his father, and Spanish-Turkish conflicts under Philip took place mainly in the Mediterranean.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How successful was Wolsey in his Domestic Administration 1515-29?

    4 star(s)

    Instead he produced the 'amicable grant' trying to appeal to the patriotic and generous side of people. But when he wanted more money on top of what they were already paying the taxpayers resisted and a rebellion began. Much of it centred around the wool town of Lavenham, were it was Bedlam as they refused to pay any more money.

  1. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    Factories were also targeted along with workshops. Machinery was vandalised or burnt and even some employers were threatened and some even killed. The attacks were started by workers in Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire but machine breaking later spread to workers in Lancashire, Cheshire and the Yorkshire area, where hand-loom weavers attacked the new steam powered looms and their owners.

  2. Asses the most important factors that led to David Lloyd George(TM)s downfall in 1922

    So although his intentions were good, the violence caused in Ireland by LG's treaty, was undoubtedly one of the major factors that led to his downfall. The Chanak Crisis, which coincided with the situation in Ireland, was the final straw for many Tory MP's regarding LG.

  1. Constitutional Nationalism succeeded in achieving its aims whereas revolutionary nationalism failed and cultural nationalism ...

    However, unlike the revolutionary nationalists, the constitutional nationalists were committed to working within the confines of the law mostly and were completely against the use of violence to achieve their goals. The first constitutional nationalist that I will consider is Daniel O'Connell who came to prominence in 1820, once described

  2. HOW FAR, FROM 1800 TO 1921, DID CONSTITUTIONAL NATIONALISM SUCCEED IN ACHIEVING REFORM WITHIN, ...

    something that was addressed later not because of constitutional nationalism, but the British Government's introduction of the Great Reform Act in 1832. In his alliance with the Whigs during the 1830s, O'Connell was able to press for a number of small reforms, and although some of these were achieved, ultimately

  1. How and why was Pitt able to gain and secure his Prime Minister position ...

    The King felt that the situation proved that he still had the power to appoint Prime Ministers without having to rely on any parliamentary group. An important factor in Pitt's ability to survive parliament was that he demonstrated extraordinary self-confidence and was not afraid to refuse a cabinet post.

  2. Why was the reform act of 1832 passed?

    and election as people saw a hint of change from the catholic act and the election meant people, although who could vote was limited, could put their views forward and try and bring in government who were supportive of people's views and changed the government to the current times instead of the system which was archaic, over 100 years old.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work