• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Disraeli pass the 1867 Second Reform Act?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Disraeli pass the 1867 Second Reform Act? The 1867 Second Reform Act was an extremely intelligent piece of politics and demonstrated how clever Disraeli was as a politician, the act itself would enable Disraeli to the gain power amongst the Commons. With the death of Palmerston in 1865 the question of Reform was immediately back on agenda. Palmerston had been such a major political figure that while he was present, reform would never be an issue in the Houses of Parliament. Within a couple of months of the Derby administration coming into power there were two days of riots in Hyde Park over the reform of Parliament, involving clashes with police and the destruction of some of the park railings. If the Conservatives wished to remain in power something needed to be done, or so Disraeli said when he made a speech to the Commons in 186 7 saying that reform needed to be passed in order to "destroy the present agitation". ...read more.

Middle

We know also that this is not entirely true as when Disraeli created the Bill he discretely placed in it an "insurance policy", although the right to vote would be given to far more voter's in potentially Liberal voting areas, they were still severely under-represented in Parliament, so the support of the working class voters was not necessary. Tory democracy was not in actual fact beneficial to the working class, indeed the only people who would benefit from it were the Conservatives themselves, this is because Tory democracy was not about helping the working class but instead, gaining there support while doing as little social reform as possible, this is shown in 1866 when the Conservatives joined forces with several right wing Liberals in putting down the Second Reform Bill, if he had really wished to improve conditions for the working class then Disraeli would not have let his rivalry with Gladstone come between him and social reform. ...read more.

Conclusion

An additional benefit to Disraeli in passing the Second Reform Act was his intense dislike of Ewart Gladstone, the rivalry between Disraeli and Gladstone had been present since the repeal of the Corn Laws in 1845, and during the 1866 Russel administration Disraeli had cleverly demolished an attempt by Gladstone to push through a Second Reform Bill. If therefore, Gladstone was able to push through a Reform Bill of his own only a year later he would be humiliating the Liberals and in particular Gladstone himself, this is a concept he called, "to dish the Whigs". Principally the reasons for Disraeli passing the 1867 Second Reform Act was to gain power for himself among the government, potentially succeeding Derby as the Prime minister. However, his stated political reasons of the time might simply have been said to justify reform amongst his own party. Aneurin Rainbird SF5 History SA ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This response offers a good range of explanations for the reform bill of 1867, with awareness of Disraeli's personal and political context shown throughout. Some explanations lacked depth and the conclusion certainly could have been developed further.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 26/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Was Kenilworth a typical medieval castle?

    supply, a quarry, forests and a good food supply was easily obtainable. There were two Brookes near by, Inchford and Fineham brooks, good for drinking and washing, although, not a very good defence. With Kenilworth being so near to quarries this meant stone was readily available, which Kenilworth was later built from.

  2. Constitutional Nationalism succeeded in achieving its aims whereas revolutionary nationalism failed and cultural nationalism ...

    Also, due to their talking about violence, Young Ireland split with O'Connell in 1846, either being expelled from or leaving the National Repeal Association. After, their expulsion from the Association and Davis' death, the nationalist group simply dissipated. Another cultural nationalist group, that I wish to discuss is the Gaelic

  1. How successfully did the Liberal Reforms 1906-14 meet the social needs of the British ...

    people were insured against unemployment and sickness "it left the adult citizen alone". In contrast, Peter Clark argues that even though the reforms were limited, they by-passed the Poor Laws and brought in a system which won approval. Martin Pugh stands somewhere in the middle, his argument being that the

  2. Why did Labour win the 1945 election and lose in the 1951 election?

    They also caused higher taxes, and the unstable economy caused many voters to demonise labour in 1951. Labour's popularity was also dented by their foreign policy, in granting sovereignty to some of Britain's most successful colonies Labour were seen as dissembling an empire that had taken hundreds of years to attain.

  1. Why did King Charles I Resort to Personal Rule in 1629?

    The events that followed became known as the "Five Knights Case". Some seventy gentlemen were remanded in prison for refusing to pay the Loan. They tested the legality of it by issuing a habeas corpus. However, the Privy Council would not give the specific reason as to their imprisonment.

  2. Henry VII achieved the aims of his foreign policy. Comment

    In addition, Henry asked for the Duke of Suffolk to be handed over to him on the grounds of treason. The Duke of Suffolk had fled to Burgundy to seek the assistance of Margaret of Burgundy to help return the throne of England to the house of York.

  1. How effective was Henry VII’s government?

    money in an emergency, which was very important to him considering his weaker position on the throne earlier on. It could be argued that as a move to centralisation, Henry's use of the chamber is a characteristic, as it allowed him to distribute money from the centre as he was in total charge of it.

  2. Why did Pitt dominate politics 1783-93?

    His first major policy was the India Act in 1784. The act set up joint control of India with the East India Company, and set up of board of control in London so parliament could see what was going on.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work