• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Disraeli pass the 1867 Second Reform Act?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Disraeli pass the 1867 Second Reform Act? The 1867 Second Reform Act was an extremely intelligent piece of politics and demonstrated how clever Disraeli was as a politician, the act itself would enable Disraeli to the gain power amongst the Commons. With the death of Palmerston in 1865 the question of Reform was immediately back on agenda. Palmerston had been such a major political figure that while he was present, reform would never be an issue in the Houses of Parliament. Within a couple of months of the Derby administration coming into power there were two days of riots in Hyde Park over the reform of Parliament, involving clashes with police and the destruction of some of the park railings. If the Conservatives wished to remain in power something needed to be done, or so Disraeli said when he made a speech to the Commons in 186 7 saying that reform needed to be passed in order to "destroy the present agitation". ...read more.

Middle

We know also that this is not entirely true as when Disraeli created the Bill he discretely placed in it an "insurance policy", although the right to vote would be given to far more voter's in potentially Liberal voting areas, they were still severely under-represented in Parliament, so the support of the working class voters was not necessary. Tory democracy was not in actual fact beneficial to the working class, indeed the only people who would benefit from it were the Conservatives themselves, this is because Tory democracy was not about helping the working class but instead, gaining there support while doing as little social reform as possible, this is shown in 1866 when the Conservatives joined forces with several right wing Liberals in putting down the Second Reform Bill, if he had really wished to improve conditions for the working class then Disraeli would not have let his rivalry with Gladstone come between him and social reform. ...read more.

Conclusion

An additional benefit to Disraeli in passing the Second Reform Act was his intense dislike of Ewart Gladstone, the rivalry between Disraeli and Gladstone had been present since the repeal of the Corn Laws in 1845, and during the 1866 Russel administration Disraeli had cleverly demolished an attempt by Gladstone to push through a Second Reform Bill. If therefore, Gladstone was able to push through a Reform Bill of his own only a year later he would be humiliating the Liberals and in particular Gladstone himself, this is a concept he called, "to dish the Whigs". Principally the reasons for Disraeli passing the 1867 Second Reform Act was to gain power for himself among the government, potentially succeeding Derby as the Prime minister. However, his stated political reasons of the time might simply have been said to justify reform amongst his own party. Aneurin Rainbird SF5 History SA ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This response offers a good range of explanations for the reform bill of 1867, with awareness of Disraeli's personal and political context shown throughout. Some explanations lacked depth and the conclusion certainly could have been developed further.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 26/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. How effective was Henry VII’s government?

    Having come to the throne with the help of France, it was Henry's policy to be friendly to France. What this did to his government was that Henry no longer had to fear invasion from the French, so he could redirect finances to other places, mainly keeping Scotland out.

  2. What Was The Main Cause Of The First English Civil War?

    The Star Chamber was especially brutal, torturing by many different methods in order to reveal testimonies and evidence. Lawyer William Prynne and John Lilburne were notable victims of the court for their idealisms - Lilburne's case was a decisive factor in Parliament's decision to enforce the Habeas Corpus Act 1640,

  1. Constitutional Nationalism succeeded in achieving its aims whereas revolutionary nationalism failed and cultural nationalism ...

    One of the main successes of the Fenians was the funeral of Terrence Ballew MacManus who died in 1861 when the leadership of the Fenians exhumed his body and shipped it back to Dublin. In Dublin a controversial public funeral took place against the wishes of ArchBishop Cullen which was attended by 12,000 people.

  2. Why did Labour win the 1945 election and lose in the 1951 election?

    While this gave them a temporary boost in the polls, it did nothing but hinder them in the long term. Similarly, Labour simply made too many promises that were out of their reach, however they did fulfil most of their promises.

  1. To what extent was Mary I successful in her attempt to re-impose Catholicism in ...

    Pope Julius III empowered Cardinal Reginald Pole, Mary's cousin, to bring England back to Rome. Pole was a moderate Catholic reformer who believed in the ideas of Cardinal Contarini, who thought that the way to destroy wasn't to engage in war with the heretics but rather not to deserve their criticism.

  2. How successful were the reforms carried out by Alexander II in the second half ...

    However, the new system suffered from numerous imperfections. For example, there was a shortage of trained lawyers and therefore the trial would be quite unfair and very disorganised. On the other hand, the new system was less corrupt, which is evident from the famous Vera Zasulich case of 1878.

  1. Why did Pitt dominate politics 1783-93?

    His first major policy was the India Act in 1784. The act set up joint control of India with the East India Company, and set up of board of control in London so parliament could see what was going on.

  2. How successful were Peels social and economic reforms between 1841 and 1846?

    He also rejuvenated business confidence and greatly helped to regulate it. The Bank Charter Act of 1844 placed serious restriction on credit and had built the building blocks for future modern methods used to control the economy, another example of Peel?s competence of implementing a sense of continuity in the country; putting an emphasis on lasting.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work