• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did German Foreign Policy change direction after 1937?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did German Foreign Policy change direction after 1937? The first four years of Nazi rule in Germany were undoubtedly characterised by the revisionist policies which were both evident during the final years of the Weimar Government and used extensively in order to allow Hitler and the Nazis to take power in Germany by appealing to the wants and needs of the German public. Many Germans resented the Treaty of Versailles and revisionist ideas would have been on the agenda of any elected Government and Hitler's passionate speeches and rallies convinced the German people that he would be able to deliver his promises more quickly and effectively than any other party. In 1937 however, Nazi Foreign Policy became much less compliant and more aggressive, as well as exhibiting an increasing expansionist desire. A number of factors influencing this marked change have been suggested by historians. The continuity with Weimar in the early years of the Nazi regime centred around regaining territory lost in the Treaty of Versailles in a non-aggressive way. For example, Germany regained the Saarland by holding a plebiscite, began rapid re-armament, remilitarised the Rhineland and left the League of Nations with very little opposition from either Britain or France, two of the main members of the League of Nations council. ...read more.

Middle

This, he claimed, highlighted the German need for an empire, and would account for a more expansionist Foreign Policy. This idea was used when the Anschluss with Austria was completed. Germany gained 100,000 men for its Army as well as access to Austria's plentiful Foreign Currency reserves and industrial output, such as steel. The Anschluss was also important for the implementation of a new, expansionist Foreign Policy not because it was thought of as Lebensraum itself, but because it was strategically important for both the attack of Czechoslovakia and defence against Britain and France. Hitler is quoted as saying, in the Hossbach Memorandum, that "our first objective...must be to overthrow Czechoslovakia and Austria simultaneously in order to remove the threat from our flank of any possible operation in the West". In other words he was wary of the fact that as France was an ally of Czechoslovakia, France may be able to resist a German invasion of Russia or the Balkan states. The Czech border with Germany was heavily defended but the Czech border with Austria was hardly defended at all, and it would therefore be much easier for the German Army to attack Czechoslovakia from there. Anschluss with Austria was also crucial to any plan of defence against a British or French attack as it formed an unbroken front from Germany, through Austria, to Italy. ...read more.

Conclusion

He was present at the meeting in 1937 from which the Hossbach Memorandum was written and subsequently expressed his dislike of the Fuhrer's proposals, a move which saw him removed from office within three months along with many other senior Nazi members. He was replaced by Ribbentrop, a more compliant, if hopeless, Foreign Minister. This final move by Hitler allowed him to embark on a rapidly changing Foreign Policy with little interference from senior Party members, with the eventual goal being the acquisition of Lebensraum. In conclusion, there were two main types of reason as to why German Foreign Policy changed direction in 1937. The first of these is the improving International situation which Germany found itself facing and the way in which Hitler saw this progressing. For example, the failure of the League of Nations, the prospect of facing a policy of appeasement and increased alliances with Italy and Japan, all meant that German expansion would not face as strong an opposition as in previous years. The second type of reason relates to Internal pressures, within Germany. Hitler foresaw the problems associated with maintaining a military-based economy and isolation, i.e. that the German people would soon face severe food shortages and were becoming increasingly discontent with the lack of consumer goods available. His solution to these problems was to aim for "expansion" (war with Russia) within the next few years, while Germany still had the support of an army of workers and an arms advantage. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    This put them against Stalin who had called for 'Socialism in One Country'. The Left had also called for rapid industrialisation and the abandonment of the NEP before Stalin was ready to do so. Because the left were associated with the views of Trotsky it was relatively easy to attack them as enemies of the state.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    Britain was bankrupted by the cost of the war: her exports had declined by nearly 70 percent; her foreign debts had increased by 600 percent, largely on account of her borrowings from the USA. Only the United States came out of the war a good deal better off than she went into it.

  1. To What Extent was the Idea of 'Lebensraum' the Main War Aim of Hitler's ...

    However it has been greatly proven in many cases that influential Nazi members simply agreed and followed Hitler in order to gain his favour, and these views may not actually be something they support personally. Therefore the only conclusion we can draw from this is that if Hitler were to

  2. To what extent did the international situation in 1933 favour Hitler's foreign policy aims?

    In 1933, there was a growing change of attitude in Britain; it was suggested that Germany had not been solely responsible for the outbreak of war. Britain's attitude towards Hitler was particularly favourable; the British Prime Minister felt Hitler should and could be accommodated, and that it would be possible to do business with him.

  1. 'PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS OUTWEIGHED IDEOLOGY IN FOREIGN POLICY' IN RELATION TO GERMANY IN THE YEARS ...

    The Nazi anti-Bolshevik propaganda convinced thousands of Europeans including Britain that Hitler was also Europe's best defence against all Communists. The opportunity was there on March 7, 1936, Hitler marched his troops into the Rhineland, a clear violation of Versailles.

  2. "The most important aim of foreign policy 1933-1936 was to overthrow the terms of ...

    This put Britain in a risky position as firstly this was very much against the TOV and it also shows that Britain was in favour of proposed German rearmament programs. Resulting from this pact, France and Italy both dropped any planned for action that they had in mind.

  1. Explain the role of Czechoslovakia in the appeasement story.

    But in these elections the Communist Party linked Henlein's Party very directly to Hitler. The Communists said that by voting for German People's Party they were voting for Hitler and therefore voting for war. This link was of course denied and Henlein managed to get away with it because the

  2. Albert Speers Role as German Armaments Minister during the War

    Speer also formed groups so they could rebuild damaged bridges and widen roads. Gradually Speer assumed a greater role within Hitler?s inner circle and was very influential in the first years of the war. After a plane crash where the Minister of Armaments, Fritz Todt, was killed, Hitler appointed Speer as Todt?s successor and he immediately stepped into the position.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work