• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Henry VII win the Battle of Bosworth?

Extracts from this document...


Why did Henry VII win the Battle of Bosworth? There are a number of reasons why Henry VII won the Battle of Bosworth. Whilst there were political, military and economic reasons why Henry won, the political reasons held more weight. There were long term political reasons that contributed significantly to Henry?s success. For instance, the marriage arranged by Elizabeth Woodville and Margaret Beaufort that united Henry and Elizabeth of York. The marriage was publically announced by Henry in 1483 in the Rennes Chapel, Brittany. The marriage not only strengthened Henry?s claim to the thrown and increased his legitimacy, which was very important at this point in History, but it also increased Henry?s support. It did this by uniting the support of Elizabeth and Margaret who had previously been enemies. This gave Henry support on the Battlefield from not only Lancastrians but some Yorkists that had supported Edward V too, which naturally contributed to his victory as he had more people in England supporting him. ...read more.


It was arguably the turning point of the battle when the brothers, who had remained impartial surveying the battle waiting to see which army would take the lead, decided to enter it on the Lancastrian side. Having made up nearly half of Richard III?s army, this addition of 6,500 soldiers to the Lancastrian army resulted in it being the bigger army of the two sides. They had a tactical position on the field, one brother on each side of the field, which meant when they attacked William, they could attack him from both sides. It was a combination of having more soldiers and the Stanley brother?s strategic location on the battle field that then led to Richard?s death and the end of the battle. There were some short term military reasons as to why Henry won the Battle of Bosworth. Henry?s uncle Jasper Tudor was able to assist him with his military expertise however it was largely down to military luck and chance that Henry was victorious. ...read more.


Henry was able to gain the necessary economic support from Charles VIII of France due to Charles hoping this would distract Richard III from sending help to Brittany. It was this economic support that gave Henry VII the best chance in battle which therefore contributed to his victory. It is clear to see that without doubt that the political reasons for Henry winning the Battle of Bosworth not only outnumber the military and economic reasons but they are of greater importance too. The military reasons hold little significance due to the nature of the battle. This is effectively put by Charles Oman, writer of The Art of War in the Middle Ages that the Battle of Bosworth ?can hardly be taken for serious military study- since it was not settled by strategy or tactics, but by mere treachery?. In addition to this, the economic reason was only one piece in the jigsaw puzzle to why Henry won, whereas the political reasons, both long term and short, made larger contributions to the victory as a whole not only in the build up to the Battle, but during the Battle itself. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. The Battle of Bosworth.

    They owned an army of 5000. They both provided individual excuses to the king as to why they could not come. Due to his own suspicions, Richard took Lord Strange, son of Thomas Lord Stanley, hostage. There are many different speculations as to why the Stanleys did not turn up.

  2. What, in your view, was the short term significance of the Battle of the ...

    been expended on the battlefield."[2] This represents the effect the loss of experienced soldiers had on the remaining Army and the country that struggled in vain to replace them. Rupprecht came to the conclusion much earlier than most other German generals, towards the end of 1917, that the war could

  1. Henry VII and His Money.

    If a tenant-in-chief died leaving a son or daughter the King took over responsibility for the child, or children, as well as legal authority over them. A more urgent reason for Henry's interest in these 'wards' was due to the fact that revenues from the dead parents' lands also went to the King.

  2. To what extent can it be argued that threats to Henry VII were as ...

    However, again the threat of no powerbase had nothing to do with his usurpation; it was due to him growing up abroad. To prove this point, it can be argued that Richard III usurped the throne from his nephew Edward V, and Richard grew up in England.

  1. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    Charles was also aware of the Anglo-Burgundian alliance thus his further desire to make peace with the Duke. If the English army no longer had their support, they would not survive much longer as most of the allied troops

  2. Why did Henry VII win in 1485?

    quite a popular King at the time and many wouldn't have liked Richard saying that Edward had actually had no claim to the throne in the first place. Henry therefore changed from being an unlikely claimant to the throne, to a rival of Richard III.

  1. Look at the presentation of heroes & villains in the media. Discuss why the ...

    Also James Bond wouldn't be James Bond without the couple of phrases he says in all his films "Martini...shaken, not stirred" and "Names Bond, James Bond". These sayings are like his catchphrases to grab the audiences' attention and trigger in your mind something that tells you that a mysterious, dangerous or very passionate/romantic bit is about to occur.

  2. Warner Bros.' GoodFellas (1990) is director Martin Scorsese's stylistic masterpiece - a follow-up film ...

    impromptu oral sex in the kitchen for giving her a wad of bills. ["He's Sure the Boy I Love," performed by The Crystals.] In the Suite Lounge in Queens on a day in June 1970 - the beginning of the sequence which opens the film, a celebration is being held for the release of Mafia member Billy Batts (Frank Vincent)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work