• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did opposition to the Tsarist regime increase between 1881-1904?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Matthew Parnell Why did opposition to the Tsarist regime increase between 1881-1904? Page 1 Opposition to Tsarist Government had long been a feature of the Romanov rule with strict laws in place to oversee that nobody spoke out against the Tsar?s rule. During the autocratic years from 1881-1904 Russia went through two Tsars, Alexander III and his successor Nicholas II both obsessed with keeping absolute power over Russia. During that period it was an offence to speak out against the Tsar whilst nobody could challenge the Tsar?s rule as there was no parliament in place to speak for the people and no free press which meant that no one could release information that might influence the people to revolt for a better quality of life. This led to a hard struggle for the Russian people who endured numerous years of hardship under the Tsar; however it also resulted in the formation of politically organised parties in Russia that would each have separate ambitions for what they wanted for the future of Russia and her people. The causes of Tsarist opposition could be argued to have been started by Alexander II who ironically was trying to stop opposition to the Tsarist regime by relaxing controls over the press and universities which inadvertently saw the emergence of the intelligentsia. ...read more.

Middle

The Democrats would later split into the Bolsheviks who thought the party should be ruled under one central leadership and that the way forward would be revolution whereas the Mensheviks beliefs were more democratic as they believed in allowing each member a say. The Liberals would also later split into the Kadets who wanted a parliament and better re-distribution of land for the peasants but had no problems with a constitutional monarchy whereas the Octoberists who also wanted a parliament were more focused on increasing Russia?s economic strength. Page 2 A third party the Social Revolutionaries grew directly out of the Populists and continued their predecessor?s approach of terrorism to reach their aims as a group founded in 1879 ?the peoples will? were responsible for the assassination of Tsar Alexander II whilst also continuing their extremist views into the early 1900?s between 1901 and 1905, were it was the terrorist faction of the Revolutionaries that dominated with over 2000 assassinations, including Plehve, the interior minister, and the Tsar?s uncle, Duke Sergei. Eventually this unrest along with several assassination attempts from the Revolutionaries resulted in Alexander III abdicating in 1894 leaving his young and shy son Nicholas II as supreme ruler of Russia. ...read more.

Conclusion

Hundreds of people died on the day that is now known as Bloody Sunday. This led to a national outbreak of disorder with strikes and riots in major cities whilst even minor mutiny in the Army and Navy who were ashamed of the defeat in the war, the Tsar was at war with his own people the revolution had begun. There were many factors of why opposition increased between 1881 and 1904 however the main reason was the introduction of western ideas to what had previously been a nation in isolationism with the prevention of free press. The ideas (Marxism) that had seeped in to Russia made the public question why they couldn?t have a say in how their country was run which led to the development and rise in organised political parties which became the main opposition to the Tsarist regime as both Tsar?s struggled to cope with what the people wanted. Ultimately the sheer size of Russia and its massive population made it impossible to govern and whilst Russia struggled to get out of its backward status the public?s welfare was compromised as both Tsars main priority was to increase Russia economically. This led to an inevitable uprising. (1245 words) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    These two things acted together to help the Bolsheviks into power. The Bolsheviks wouldn't have got power if the Provisional Government had been unpopular on its own, or if the Bolsheviks had been strong without a weak government already in place.

  2. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    One major style= neoclassical style with the style of the Greeks, but on a massive scale. The individual was dwarfed in front of the building to show authority. Hitler had grand plans for rebuilding Berlin. Media: Press: the regime controlled the press by controlling the journalists, editors and publishers through the Reich Association of the German press.

  1. What were the causes of the 1905 Revolution? Why did the Revolution fail to ...

    The fact that he was not at the Winter Palace to receive the demonstrators petition in 1905 was arguable a mistake that damaged the long accepted view of the Tsar as the father and protector of his people. A further long-term social and economic cause of the 1905 Revolution was the worsening conditions of both peasants and urban workers.

  2. Free essay

    What Were the Causes of the 1905 Revolution? Why did the Revolution Fail to ...

    Another long term cause of the 1905 revolution was the repressive reign of Alexander III. Alexander II, Nicholas' grandfather, was assassinated in front of Alexander III, Nicholas' father and Nicholas himself. This deeply affected Alexander as a ruler; he believed that the introduction of reform or indeed change of any kind would be the downfall of a ruler.

  1. How secure was the Tsars power up to 1904

    revision of the censorship regulations, a cancellation of outstanding and overdue taxes and an increase in tolerance towards Poland and the Catholic Church served to strengthen the Csar's position and earned him the title of the 'Csar Liberator'. However, the basic autocratic nature of Alexander's rule did not lend itself

  2. Was Russia more or less stable by 1881?

    The stability was not ensured anymore since the War revealed the weakness of the Russian army as well as his general immense backwardness compared to Western Europe. The questioning of Tsarism itself seemed to be inevitable. Alexander II now faced a disastrous defeat and an Empire repressed by his father's

  1. Journalism: The People's Witness

    Could he have known that the country who's political agenda was seemingly dangerous, were about to create possibly the darkest part of our world's history, the extermination of the Jews? Although it is not possible that The Holocaust could have been foreseen, Burchett article has extreme relevance as he suggests

  2. Why did the 1905 revolution fail to overthrow the Tsarist regime?

    This reaffirmed the Tsars feelings toward national minorities and further helped the Tsardom to eradicate opposition. The Black Hundreds coupled with the Army meant that the Tsar was able to stay in power, without both of these he would have fallen at the hands of the people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work