• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Parliament win the English Civil War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Parliament win the English Civil War? There is no simple explanation that explains why Parliament won the English Civil War; there were many factors that culminated in the reformation of England into a republic. These factors consist of fundamental advantages that Parliament had before the commencement of battle (tax revenues for example) and specific events during the war (such as victorious battles). At the commencement of the Civil War in 1642, both the Parliamentarians and the Royalists had certain advantages over eachother, although it is popularly perceived that Parliament's advantages outweighed those of the Royalists. One of Parliament's advantages was that they controlled some of the more economically advanced areas of the country (most significantly the Southeast), this was an important factor as it allowed a more efficient production of weapons and other wartime essentials. Parliament also occupied areas with lots of armouries and troops, a prime example being Hull, which was a rich source of arms and also supplied an army of some 16,000 troops. ...read more.

Middle

Parliament went into the war with all the aforementioned advantages, however these were no substitute for the events that occurred during the war. Throughout the war both sides' armies stubbornly remained in their locality for fear of their homes being plundered, with one notable exception; in 1643 London's trained bands left their posts to help their counterparts further north. This was not a hugely significant factor but nevertheless it contributed to the Parliamentarian war effort. By late 1643 another dilemma had mutually occurred among the respective sides. This dilemma was a lack of troops. The natural step was to seek the help of the Scots, and both sides attempted to do so. The Scots however were opposed to the King after he had, a few years earlier, attempted to implement an Arminian prayer book into Scotland, this had led to war so the Scots sided with Parliament. This signified a huge setback to the Royalists and a great achievement for Parliament. ...read more.

Conclusion

This battle in 1644 signalled the end of the King's northern stronghold and was therefore a significant factor in Parliament's eventual success. A yet more decisive battle came in June 1645 on the grounds of Naseby. Here came the definite realisation of the Parliamentary victory to come when, the Royalist's last main field army was beaten by Cromwell, Fairfax and their many pawns. Then came the final major battle of the English Civil War; the battle of Longport- a mere formality for the Parliamentarians, its only significance derived from the perspective of hindsight when its finality is demonstrated. This was effectively the end of the war. The aforementioned battles laid the foundations for and signalled the end of The English Civil War and Parliament's consequent escalation to sole governors of England and her lands. In conclusion, it is not possible to state one reason or event that, beyond all others, was responsible for Parliament's victorious Civil War campaign. A whole plethora of factors were responsible for Parliament's feat and it was the amalgamation of these factors that led to their victory. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay


**
There are a number of factors responsible for Parliament's victory in the Civil War; Resources, Building Armies, Making Alliances, Political Struggles & Battles are the main ones. Each one deserves a paragraph explaining in what way it was a contributing factor with evidence to support the point. This answer is relatively brief - more of an overview which would lose marks due to lack of detail and supporting evidence. Examiners tend to award marks for a level of thinking and this is why it is important not to rewrite chunks of a textbook but to think, organise, select and then deploy evidence in order to persuasively argue a point. Strong focus on the question is paramount and links should be explicit not implicit. Overall, this answer has elements in it which answer the question but it is not sustained or developed. It would also benefit from better organisation and planning.

Marked by teacher Natalie Stanley 08/01/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Was Charles I responsible for his execution?

    He was tried and found guilty, but he was revered as a hero, in particular by Parliament. This is evident of a growing feeling of resentment towards the king's policies especially from Parliament. Also it showed a struggle of power already beginning between the King and Parliament, both wanted to

  2. Why did Labour win the 1945 election and lose in the 1951 election?

    However, in 1950, Labour won by a tiny majority of 5 seats and in 1951 the Conservatives won by a majority of 17. This was an admittedly small majority, but reflected a changing public mood. Labour would not again form a government until 1964, the question is; what caused people to revert back to supporting the conservatives once again?

  1. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    With the Religious struggle throughout the thirty-year war, James was pressured by both Catholics and Puritans for support, James found himself increasingly dependant on those at the opposite side of the Church of England called anti-Calvinists. Other wise known as Arminianism and later on in Charles reign Laudism.

  2. What Was The Main Cause Of The First English Civil War?

    Charles refused to compromise on his adherence towards Episcopacy and this culminated in the Root Branch Petition of 1640, of which consisted of 15,000 London-based signatures from those who were suffering at the time against the King's policies. Many people were suspicious of this church-led government and preferred the idea of its abolishment.

  1. Assess the validity of the view that the Rump and Barebones parliaments had no ...

    In April 1650 an Act versus the non-observance of the Sabbath day was passed, while in September of that year it repealed all laws compelling attendance to the national church, a much hated remnant of the 1559 Elizabethan religious settlement.

  2. Why Did Parliament Win The Civil War?

    It ended in a draw but by the time Charles decided and they were ready to march on to London, the city was ready to fight him. Furthermore, the areas that were in the hands of Parliament over the duration of the civil war were more populous, wealthy and fertile than that of the Royalist's.

  1. What Caused The English Civil War ?

    He had to pay the Scots to leave England. This war caused financial difficulties. In 1626 Charles asked Parliament to raise money for him and Parliament refused because they thought Charles wasn't spending his money wisely. He was mainly spending his money on artwork by Van Dyke and Ruben.

  2. Why did Pitt dominate politics 1783-93?

    The restoration and improvement of the Royal Navy also increased support as people felt he had restored something that gave Britain pride and strength. All of these helped Pitt secure the vote of many more people and cemented his domination, and show everyone how he was better than his opposition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work