• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Parliament win the first civil war?

Extracts from this document...


Why did Parliament Win the First Civil War? The First Civil War lasted several years and it was not clear who was to win. In the end however, Parliament did succeed, and the King failed. How this was done, through allies, generals and money is what is going to be explained. The generals were a major factor as they were the ones who led the armies, inspired them to fight well and bravely and had to work out the tactics that were to be used. Oliver Cromwell became the most important general on the Parliamentarian side and Prince Rupert of the Rhine (1618 - 1692) on the Royalist side. Oliver Cromwell was famous for his well thought out tactics and his well disciplined army, where as Rupert, the kings nephew, made decisions without thinking them through and was not always in full control of his men. ...read more.


Sir Thomas Fairfax (1612 - 1671) was appointed Lord-General and Philip Skippon as Major General. The army was made up of 11 regiments of horse, 12 regiments of foot and 1,000 dragoons, mounted men armed with carbines, in all 22,000 men. It turned their army into an 'efficient fighting force with a Puritan religious zeal.' The officers were trained and the soldiers were drilled. The army was well equipped, well fed and paid. Less than half of it was from the existing army and the rest were from London and the eastern countries. Although the King joked about this new army, he was defeated by it in Naseby in the last major battle of the war. To be in control of London, as Parliament was, was a powerful thing. Parliament had control over London, the customs and the key ports, which meant money. ...read more.


By the time the Scots decided to change sides, the New Model Army was fighting well. Wars cost money. Charles had many very wealthy supporters and could have funded a short war very easily. But there was no quick victory for him and his supporters so money was becoming a concern. As well as having the advantage of controlling London, the Parliamentarians were also much more efficient that the Royalists at collecting taxes from the areas they controlled. The King could not afford to raise another army after many of his men were killed at Naseby in 1645 It was not only that Parliament won the First Civil war, but that the Royalists lost. It was not that Parliament had more support than the king, because they didn't and it was not that Parliament had always been stronger because they hadn't. The king didn't take his chance early on, and the Parliamentarian side grew stronger and had good leaders, along with the fact that they had the advantage of support and control over London. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did Parliament win the English Civil War?

    During the winter of 1644 perhaps the most significant factors in Parliament's ultimate success occurred. These were the introduction of the New Modal Army and the passing of the Self Denying Ordinance. The former meant the integration of all Parliament's respective armies into one single, unified field army with a clear leadership structure under Cromwell and Fairfax.

  2. Why Did Parliament Win The Civil War?

    In practical terms, the Ordinance solidified the power of Cromwell and his "war party" faction. The remodelling of the army of Parliament was a key factor in its eventual victories over the King. Although the Royalist army were also subject to a reshuffle, it wasn't on the same level as the Parliamentarians.

  1. Why did Parliament win the First Civil War?

    Politically, John Pym was very important until his death in 1643. He kept Parliament's war effort together and his leadership was vital to the Earl of Essex's survival in the war. He made sure that all of Parliament were for defeating the King and the Royalist forces as the were

  2. Was Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain?

    No one has ever put a King on trial. So Cromwell is a traitor. Also, God, to rule the country, puts Kings and Cromwell probably wanted the throne for himself. Most historians say that Oliver Cromwell persuaded a lot of people that Charles I should be executed.

  1. Why did parliament win the civil war?

    In February 1645 Parliament passed the New Model Ordinance, bringing the Armies of the Earl of Essex and Manchester and Sir William Waller into a national army under professional officers; this emerged from the unimpressive performance of Parliament's forces after their success at the Battle of Marston Moor in 1644.

  2. The roles and leadership of Charles Stuart and John Pym in the English Civil ...

    According to Conrad Russell13 in his book The Crisis of Parliaments Pym's greatest achievement was probably the creation of a financial and administrative machine which, in the long run, would enable parliament to win the war. Here, Russell openly states that Pym's role, more specifically his role in creating the financial system, was a factor in winning the war.

  1. Why did Parliament win the Civil War?

    The Battle of Edge hill had left the road to London clear for the Royalists. However, their defeat at the hands of the 'London trained Bands' prevented the Royalists taking London, which would have almost guaranteed a victory for the King.

  2. An unmitigated disaster. How valid is this assessment of Oliver Cromwells experiment with the ...

    C. Wood, Nottinghamshire in the Civil War (Oxford, 1937)) Many believed that that hostility shown towards the Major Generals was due to the involvement of the army within politics. Godfrey Davies argued in the 1950s that, while their rule had been too short lived to have a permanent effect on the morality of the English state it had 'lasted

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work