• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

Why did President Bush not invade Iraq after he had won so easily in Kuwait?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did President Bush not invade Iraq after he had won so easily in Kuwait? History Americas Internal Assessment Word Count: 1,996 David Harvey Dr. Thomas November 20, 2004 This is my own unaided work Signature: Table of Contents Part A: Plan of the Investigation 2 Part B: Summary of Evidence 3 Part C: Evaluation of Sources 3 Part D: Analysis 7 Part E: Conclusion 9 Part F: Annotated Bibliography 10 Part A: Plan of the Investigation Why did President Bush not invade Iraq after he had won so easily in Kuwait? The President Bush of today is in Iraq finishing what his father refused to do twelve years ago, which is to take over Iraq and oust Saddam Hussein. The question remains, however: why did not President Bush simply move into Iraq and take over after he had defeated the Iraqi army in Kuwait so quickly and effortlessly? This investigation will use a variety of sources to formulate a fair and accurate response, including firsthand accounts from soldiers who participated in the war, and accounts from Kuwaiti and Iraqi civilians who lived through the horror of the war. Primary sources obtained from the American government, including White House memos, speeches, and letters will also be used. ...read more.

Middle

afford to risk his relationships around the world to take over a country that the majority of people felt was best left alone. Part C: Evaluation of Sources Clancy, Tom. Into the Strom: a study in command. (New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1997) Summers, Harry. A Critical Analysis of the Gulf War. (New York: Dell Publishing, 1992) Into the Storm, and A Critical Analysis of the Gulf War, are both books written on the Gulf War by two men who are very knowledgeable in war, but for very different reasons. Tom Clancy, who wrote Into the Storm, is one of the most well-known writers of military fiction in the world, and has written countless books that have made the best-seller list. The thesis of this secondary source is that the US did not invade Iraq as it would have cost too much money, and the US was in no position to continue spending the amounts they were spending daily on the war effort. Clancy uses many speeches and financial figures to support his point by showing how much trouble the US was in. Clancy is traditionally a fiction writer who usually writes novels about wartime situations, which could indicate that some of his points are exaggerated for effect. ...read more.

Conclusion

The final reason Bush did not take out Saddam is that it would have taken too much work and too much time to install a new government and to maintain it once Saddam's regime was gone. To find Saddam would have taken perhaps months and many American soldiers' lives would have been lost.22 Once he was found and extradited from the country, a new government would have had to be put in his place. A problem would have arisen however, as to what religion should the new government be, Shiite, Kurdish, Muslim, or Sunni? Once that decision was made, there would inevitably be some sort of uprising and therefore American troops would have to remain in Iraq indefinitely to maintain the peace, costing even more lives.23 This serves as a perfect explanation of why Bush is now invading Iraq, he is simply finishing his father's work. This also explains why Saddam continued his atrocious acts; he knew he could get away with it without any repercussion. Part E: Conclusion In Conclusion, President Bush did not invade Iraq, because it would have reflected negatively on the country in the international scene by giving it the appearance of an imperialist nation taking over anyone it wanted. This issue is significant because it helps to explain the actions of the current President and his foreign policy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Only Yesterday by Frederick Lewis Allen - review

    As stock prices continued to soar, so did the spirits of the American people. Soon, however, both prices and sprits would take plummets down into the abyss. A foretelling sign of an eventual crash is the erraticism of stock prices.

  2. A Study of Air Supremacy in the Korean War.

    However, only 657 of these aircraft were available for use at the beginning of the war. William T. Y'Blood, "The U.S. Air Force in Korea - 1950-53," Air Power Journal, Vol. 47, No. 2 (Summer 2000), 6. 2 Ibid, 6-7.

  1. US President George Bush labelled Iran and Iraq as part of an "axis of ...

    Iran could easily sustain its energy requirements using oil. Even if Iran wanted to produce nuclear power for civilian use, there is no need for it to start nuclear fuel cycle and reprocessing operations. Such operations are only done to produce fissionable material14, which is against the NPT.15 A recent CIA report has found that much of Iran's nuclear programme is indeed aimed at manufacturing nuclear weapons.

  2. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    Super Power capable of harming any country who thinks about confronting her. The role which Saddam Hussain has undertaken in serving the American purposes did not confine itself to the Gulf region alone but its has also a host of regional effects which are of greater dimension in addition to the international effects.

  1. American History.

    - At first, the bill didn't pass [Daniel Webster helped by giving it his support, but Calhoun did the opposite w/his speech] - but after Douglas split it up and had Congress vote on each aspect separately it worked. There were 5 basic aspects to the deal...

  2. The United Nations and the Iraq Conflict

    the beginning of established societies, it has been apparent that the leaders of the world are always the richest countries with the highest levels of development and military. This allows the state to be independent of outside countries; however, will continuing to gain power through holding firm control over the smaller countries below it.

  1. I have chosen to debate whether the decision to attack Iraq was indeed a ...

    If the threat of WMD attack is, in fact, Bush's primary concern, then he would surely pay the greatest attention to the greatest threat of WMD usage against the United States, and deploy available U.S. resources - troops, dollars and diplomacy - accordingly.

  2. Should We Go To War With Iraq? - Discursive Essay

    The president ordered the ground war to begin. In a brilliant and lightning-fast campaign, U.S. and coalition forces smashed through Iraq's defences and defeated Saddam Hussein's troops in only four days of combat. Allies entered Kuwait City. The Iraqi army set fire to over 500 of Kuwait's oil wells as a final act of destruction to Kuwait's infrastructure.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work