• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

Why did President Bush not invade Iraq after he had won so easily in Kuwait?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did President Bush not invade Iraq after he had won so easily in Kuwait? History Americas Internal Assessment Word Count: 1,996 David Harvey Dr. Thomas November 20, 2004 This is my own unaided work Signature: Table of Contents Part A: Plan of the Investigation 2 Part B: Summary of Evidence 3 Part C: Evaluation of Sources 3 Part D: Analysis 7 Part E: Conclusion 9 Part F: Annotated Bibliography 10 Part A: Plan of the Investigation Why did President Bush not invade Iraq after he had won so easily in Kuwait? The President Bush of today is in Iraq finishing what his father refused to do twelve years ago, which is to take over Iraq and oust Saddam Hussein. The question remains, however: why did not President Bush simply move into Iraq and take over after he had defeated the Iraqi army in Kuwait so quickly and effortlessly? This investigation will use a variety of sources to formulate a fair and accurate response, including firsthand accounts from soldiers who participated in the war, and accounts from Kuwaiti and Iraqi civilians who lived through the horror of the war. Primary sources obtained from the American government, including White House memos, speeches, and letters will also be used. ...read more.

Middle

afford to risk his relationships around the world to take over a country that the majority of people felt was best left alone. Part C: Evaluation of Sources Clancy, Tom. Into the Strom: a study in command. (New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1997) Summers, Harry. A Critical Analysis of the Gulf War. (New York: Dell Publishing, 1992) Into the Storm, and A Critical Analysis of the Gulf War, are both books written on the Gulf War by two men who are very knowledgeable in war, but for very different reasons. Tom Clancy, who wrote Into the Storm, is one of the most well-known writers of military fiction in the world, and has written countless books that have made the best-seller list. The thesis of this secondary source is that the US did not invade Iraq as it would have cost too much money, and the US was in no position to continue spending the amounts they were spending daily on the war effort. Clancy uses many speeches and financial figures to support his point by showing how much trouble the US was in. Clancy is traditionally a fiction writer who usually writes novels about wartime situations, which could indicate that some of his points are exaggerated for effect. ...read more.

Conclusion

The final reason Bush did not take out Saddam is that it would have taken too much work and too much time to install a new government and to maintain it once Saddam's regime was gone. To find Saddam would have taken perhaps months and many American soldiers' lives would have been lost.22 Once he was found and extradited from the country, a new government would have had to be put in his place. A problem would have arisen however, as to what religion should the new government be, Shiite, Kurdish, Muslim, or Sunni? Once that decision was made, there would inevitably be some sort of uprising and therefore American troops would have to remain in Iraq indefinitely to maintain the peace, costing even more lives.23 This serves as a perfect explanation of why Bush is now invading Iraq, he is simply finishing his father's work. This also explains why Saddam continued his atrocious acts; he knew he could get away with it without any repercussion. Part E: Conclusion In Conclusion, President Bush did not invade Iraq, because it would have reflected negatively on the country in the international scene by giving it the appearance of an imperialist nation taking over anyone it wanted. This issue is significant because it helps to explain the actions of the current President and his foreign policy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. There have been two Iraq Wars in recent times. The first one was in ...

    Some people thought the war was illegal. When the allies invaded Iraq they quickly defeated the Iraqi Army. Many soldiers disliked Saddam and didn't want to fight. Lots of people were happy when Saddam was overthrown. The Kurds who lived in the North of Iraq felt as if they had been liberated.

  2. The United Nations and the Iraq Conflict

    the UN to react to an attack on a city in the same way. Due to alliances and historical importance, it is obvious that certain states are regarded as more important to attack or defend.19 Alliances, the association of nations, formed to advance common interests or causes are very influential within the Security Council.

  1. History of the United States

    about 1.5 million and 260,000 southerners in an army of about 1 million). In contrast, during World War II, when the American population was 135 million and its military forces fought for 4 years throughout the world, the total dead reached 400,000.

  2. George Bush and His

    In Afghanistan the US army used a policy of 'blanket bombing', which was basically: bomb everything in sight, and you're bound to hit something. This 'something' was 1 nursing home, 2 Red Cross hospitals, 1 school and hundreds of homes.

  1. A Study of Air Supremacy in the Korean War.

    By November United Nation troops held the entire landmass of North Korea up to the Yalu River.18 Three weeks later China entered the war, changing the entire complexion of the air war. What came next was a "reverse airlift" to support the retreat of United Nation forces.

  2. American History.

    - In 1824, prompted by pressure from Georgia, Monroe suggested that all Indians be moved beyond the Mississippi River [no force would be necessary, he thought]. This was aimed primarily at the southern Creeks, Choctaws, Chickasaws and Cherokees, who all rejected the proposal.

  1. Only Yesterday by Frederick Lewis Allen - review

    Allen wrote, "the proved evidence is enough to warrant the statement that the Harding Administration was responsible in its short two years and five months for more concentrated robbery and rascality than any other in the whole history of the Federal Government" (155).

  2. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    security of the United States and this declaration became known as the 'Carter Doctrine'. He also dispatched Bzrezinski, his National Security Advisor, to Pakistan on an emergency mission. Bzrezinski spoke of the imminent communist threat and of old Russian plans to reach the warm waters and he also highlighted the importance of resisting such a threat.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work