• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did President Truman Decide to Drop the Two Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945?

Extracts from this document...


Why did President Truman Decide to Drop the Two Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945? At 02:45 August 6th 1945, the B-29 Superfortress the Enola Gay took off from the specially lengthened North Field on the Island of Tinian in the Marianas. The plane piloted by Colonel Paul Tibbets was 7 tons. At 0815 hours the bomb doors of the B-29 opened and flying at approximately 32,000 ft the uranium based atom bomb code-named "Little Boy" was unleashed upon the city of Hiroshima. Over 70,000 men women and children were killed by blast alone. And over the next half century approximately another 40,000 would die from related illnesses. With this 70,000 were wounded at Hiroshima. The co-pilot of the Enola Gay could see, "smoke and fires creeping up the side of the mountain". Then again on August 9th a second holocaust was unleashed on Nagasaki. "...a giant ball of fire rose as though from the bowels and a giant pillar of purple fire...shooting skyward and with enormous speed" The effects of the bomb here were much less spectacular than at Hiroshima. There were only 80,000 initial casualties of which 40,000 were dead. Japan surrendered to the allied forces on August 14th, 1945. Emperor Hirohito made the announcement to a stunned nation, "I can not endure the thought of letting my people suffer any longer. A continuation of the war would bring death to tens, perhaps hundreds, of thousands of persons, the whole nation would be reduced to ashes". Who had ordered this barbaric act, and for what purpose? To find the answer we examine the military situation surrounding the final stages of the war on Japan, Americas diplomatic rivalry with Russia, the need to appease American public opinion and justifying the enormous cost of the development of the weapon which was invested into by the American people and they wanted to see it in action. ...read more.


and Korea, and thus hopefully be able to expand the Communist spheres of influence just as they had done a few months previously in Eastern Europe. In July 1944 the "Big Three" had met a Yalta in the Crimea, this has now been marked as the high point in the relations between the three countries, UK, the USSR and US. One topic which had been deliberately brought up at Yalta by the US and the UK was the situation regarding Poland. The USSR wanted to take control of it just as it had done with other countries that the Red Army had conquered. However the US wanted it to become a free state with a freely elected government. After Yalta, to the US there was no longer a major issue with Poland, it had been agreed that it would hold free elections after the war. However when these did not materialise at the wars end Truman complained to the Soviet Foreign Minister Molotov of Russian action in Poland and of a general failure to implement the Yalta agreements, Molotovs response was: "I have never been spoken to like that in my life". The news of the successful development of the atomic bomb tightened Trumans response to Russian diplomacy. He was wary of the possibility of Russia occupying Manchuria and Japanese territory in the east as this would spread communism, the US wanted to contain it as best they could. With the European war over, there was now no need to appease Stalin. The only other area in which the US needed his help was the Far East. But now whether or not the USSR became involved or not would make little difference from a military point of view. But of course a Russian declaration of war would have a devastating physiological effects upon the Japanese people. At the time though. US polititions were beginning to wonder whether it might not be better the halt any Soviet expansion and influence into South East Asia by ending the war while Russian troops were still on the other side of the Manchurian Border. ...read more.


Also dropping the two bombs would have avenged the American casualties suffered in the war and for the cruel treatment of allied POW's. Truman wanted to use the bomb on the pretence of saving US lives, but his more likely motive was to gain an upper hand over Stalin during the peace negotiations by showing off the capabilities the US had. But did the dropping of the bomb achieve what had been intended? On the positive side it had brought a more rapid conclusion to the war with Japan. Emperor Hirohito had announced their surrender on August 14th and the peace terms were officially signed by Japanese delegates aboard the USS Missouri anchored in Tokyo Bay on September 2nd 1945. If Japan was to be invaded then there is no doubt that many lives have been saved. Did the bombing have the desired effect on Russia and Stalin though? The USSR invaded Japanese held Manchuria on August 9th coincidentally the same day that the plutonium bomb was dropped on Nagasaki. The USSR still held onto large areas of Eastern Europe and forced communism onto the held territories. The bombing showed the Russians what incredible power the new weapon had. If the USSR were to keep up the balance with America then they too must have one. This set the scene for the nuclear arms race between the US and the USSR, it was democracy against communism, an "iron curtain" descended across Europe and already the Cold War had begun. If the Cold War prevented a more conventional war between the two superpowers then the fact that they both had weapons of mass destruction acted as each others deterrent. And so if this is the case then the use of the bomb although unknown at the time has been justified, as it is the only time that a weapon of its kind has ever been used in anger. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. was the dropping of the atomic bombs justified?

    The number of casualties from Tokyo and the number of casualties for Nagasaki were approximately the same, however, the incendiary bombs were dropped on Tokyo where they suffered higher casualties. This shows a very strong point to why did America use the atomic bombs when, if they would have continued incendiary bombings may have lead to Japanese surrender.

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    control the majority of votes within the body responsible for developing peaceful uses of atomic energy inside the Soviet Union. When the Russians asked to negotiate about the specifics of the plan, they were told they must either accept the entire package or nothing at all.

  1. Truman had several reasons for dropping the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    The Japanese decided to launch a surprise attack on the US Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, as they would then be in a good position to take over South East Asia without any opposition from the American navy. The Americans assumed that if there were to be an attack

  2. Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified?

    The allies would be faced with the enormous task of destroying a force of five million men and five thousand suicide aircrafts belonging to a race that would fight to the death' - an American secretary for war wrote this in 1947.

  1. The Bay of Pigs Invasion

    The outcome of this debacle, led to the establishment of a threatening Soviet military presence in Cuba, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the "brink of nuclear war." VIII. Evaluation of Sources A difficulty in objectively analyzing JFK's foreign policy decision of the Bay of Pigs Invasion was the reliability of the sources and analyzing them.

  2. WWII Atomic Weapons Were Justified

    to continue with Japan would prove to be costly by much higher means. The top solution economically for a country tired from fighting, would be to end the war as fast as possible. Without an unconditional surrender by Japan the next fastest solution was to put the atomic bombs to use.

  1. Argue either for or against this statement, "President Truman's decision to drop the bombs ...

    During this time, the American government researched and quickly harnessed the world's most powerful weapon, the Atomic Bomb. Truman knew the consequences of dropping the bombs on Japan and thoroughly examined the positives and negatives of the bomb. In consideration of all this, the positives outweighed the negatives and the

  2. Why did America drop the atomic bomb on Japan

    He had a lot to prove to the American public, was he the right man for the job? Will he make America 'big'? At the time he decided to use the Atomic bomb there was an election coming up for the role of a president, he would have wanted to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work