• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did so many people go on the first crusade

Extracts from this document...


Why did so many people go on the first crusade? The reaction of the people of Christendom to the Sermon at Clermont can only have been highly unexpected to Urban II and Alexius Comnenus. However in hindsight, it is obvious why people reacted the way they did to his call. This essay will focus on several reasons why people reacted the way they did, firstly focusing on spiritual reasons, before moving on towards more material reasons. Although we have many different accounts of what was said at Clermont we do not have a perfect (true) account which limits us in the way that we view Urban's aims in launching the crusade, and why it may have appealed to the various parties who undertook this campaign, we do however have several more accurate accounts of the letters which he sent to several different areas within Christendom, which also help to indicate to us what Urban tried to achieve in each area within Christendom. Each of the letters and the various records of the sermon outline many religious reasons, these probably had the greatest effect on the peasants, which ultimately formed the first wave of the crusade, though it is important to stress that these religious reasons were just as important amongst the upper ranks of the crusade as it was amongst the lowest. ...read more.


(Ibid) The idea that people were actually going on a pilgrimage is clearly shown in the First Wave, which was largely made up of peasants who brought their families along , this gives us the idea that they not only viewed themselves as going to war against the Saracens but more importantly were going to Jerusalem on a pilgrimage to visit the holy city: 'At every town or Castle the Children would ask if that was Jerusalem where we were heading'. This is further emphasised by Peter the Hermit, who claimed to have been on a pilgrimage and therefore to control of his particular branch of the crusade. He was obviously a powerful preacher, who had managed to capture the peasants, and entrance them into the idea of the Crusade which was definitely not what Urban II intended, he had intended an army of knights mainly Francs rather than a rabble of peasants that emerged as the first wave. On the one hand the Knights crusade is easier to explain, these were the people who Urban specifically targeted, and thus we can see the motives which he tempted them with. It was to an extent less focused on religious reasons and more on material reasons, however the cost of the crusade itself puts this point in doubt, ...read more.


65-7), and to move the target to the east, this had successfully been done in Spain in the 10th and Early 11th Century, and the crusade provided an opportunity to a group of Francs whose 'life purpose was fighting', The crusade must have proved to be highly appealing to this group of people, who were able to continue to do what they were good at whilst the blessing of the Church. In Conclusion there were three principle reasons why the huge numbers of people decided to go on the crusade. The first was religious and was mainly because of the religious atmosphere in Christendom at the time, particularly in relation to the popularity of pilgrimages and the promise of absolution from sin. The second was for material gains; however the huge cost of going on the crusade meant that this was only for the very wealthy or the military leaders of the crusade. The third aspect was war itself, for many of the Francs war was their way of life, the crusade provided a war which they could justify as they were fighting in the name of the church and most importantly for Christians not against them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. To what extent was the Third Crusade a defeat for the Latins?

    The survival of the crusader states had been vital to the success of the crusade. By 1187 only the three coastal towns of Tripoli, Antioch and Tyre remained under Christian control. Without a Christian stronghold in the area it would be near impossible for the future crusaders to establish any sort of Latin presence in the area.

  2. Why People Went On Crusade

    The warriors were already convinced that God approved of their fighting, and that their warrior skills were more valuable to God than the clergy's praying. The warriors took up the concept of the crusade with enthusiasm because it fitted their own ideas about what fighting was for2.

  1. Why did the Second Crusade Fail?

    What the decided was to, instead, attack the southern wall, which in turn gave a chance to the Muslims to regroup and reinforce their power. Because of this the crusaders were forced to abandon Damascus, leading to yet another humiliating failure.

  2. To what extent was the first crusade a success

    Led by Peter the Hermit and Walter Sansavoir, they caused havoc across Europe and in a desperate attempt to be rid of them Alexius was forced to ship them over the Bosphorus into Asia Minor where they camped at civitot, hear they ignored his advice to wait for the rest

  1. The First English Civil War

    Many a promising scheme failed because of the reluctance of the militiamen to serve beyond the limits of their own county. As the offensive lay with the King, his cause naturally suffered from this far more than that of the enemy.

  2. Examine the view that the US failure in Vietnam resulted more from losing the ...

    The trouble for the Americans was that they never knew which Vietnamese was the enemy, which also was demoralising as they didn't want to hurt innocent victims.

  1. To what extent was superior military leadership the reason for success in the first ...

    The advertising of this holy war especially attracted the knights. The knights were always known for their ruthlessness. The Normans in particular have a history of fighting against fellow Christians: The Byzantians, the Sicilians and even the conquering of Britain. This led to the act of penance after each murder.

  2. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    The news quickly spread around the Europe. Often preachers stirred religious fervor of the peasants that owners couldn?t stop them from leaving, thousands of people were marching to Palestine without supplies and equipment, without having the slightest notions of distance and the hardships of the way, in the naive belief

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work