• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did so many people go on the first crusade

Extracts from this document...


Why did so many people go on the first crusade? The reaction of the people of Christendom to the Sermon at Clermont can only have been highly unexpected to Urban II and Alexius Comnenus. However in hindsight, it is obvious why people reacted the way they did to his call. This essay will focus on several reasons why people reacted the way they did, firstly focusing on spiritual reasons, before moving on towards more material reasons. Although we have many different accounts of what was said at Clermont we do not have a perfect (true) account which limits us in the way that we view Urban's aims in launching the crusade, and why it may have appealed to the various parties who undertook this campaign, we do however have several more accurate accounts of the letters which he sent to several different areas within Christendom, which also help to indicate to us what Urban tried to achieve in each area within Christendom. Each of the letters and the various records of the sermon outline many religious reasons, these probably had the greatest effect on the peasants, which ultimately formed the first wave of the crusade, though it is important to stress that these religious reasons were just as important amongst the upper ranks of the crusade as it was amongst the lowest. ...read more.


(Ibid) The idea that people were actually going on a pilgrimage is clearly shown in the First Wave, which was largely made up of peasants who brought their families along , this gives us the idea that they not only viewed themselves as going to war against the Saracens but more importantly were going to Jerusalem on a pilgrimage to visit the holy city: 'At every town or Castle the Children would ask if that was Jerusalem where we were heading'. This is further emphasised by Peter the Hermit, who claimed to have been on a pilgrimage and therefore to control of his particular branch of the crusade. He was obviously a powerful preacher, who had managed to capture the peasants, and entrance them into the idea of the Crusade which was definitely not what Urban II intended, he had intended an army of knights mainly Francs rather than a rabble of peasants that emerged as the first wave. On the one hand the Knights crusade is easier to explain, these were the people who Urban specifically targeted, and thus we can see the motives which he tempted them with. It was to an extent less focused on religious reasons and more on material reasons, however the cost of the crusade itself puts this point in doubt, ...read more.


65-7), and to move the target to the east, this had successfully been done in Spain in the 10th and Early 11th Century, and the crusade provided an opportunity to a group of Francs whose 'life purpose was fighting', The crusade must have proved to be highly appealing to this group of people, who were able to continue to do what they were good at whilst the blessing of the Church. In Conclusion there were three principle reasons why the huge numbers of people decided to go on the crusade. The first was religious and was mainly because of the religious atmosphere in Christendom at the time, particularly in relation to the popularity of pilgrimages and the promise of absolution from sin. The second was for material gains; however the huge cost of going on the crusade meant that this was only for the very wealthy or the military leaders of the crusade. The third aspect was war itself, for many of the Francs war was their way of life, the crusade provided a war which they could justify as they were fighting in the name of the church and most importantly for Christians not against them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Why did the Second Crusade Fail?

    Iberia was probably the only true success of the Second Crusade. The crusaders made their way across the Iberian Peninsula, heading towards Spain and Portugal with ambitions to conquer them. The easiest way for the crusaders to navigate was by sea and so the 'reconquista' consisted mainly of border warfare and sieges.

  2. To what extent was the Third Crusade a defeat for the Latins?

    The battle of Arsuf had therefore been a success for the Latin's not only on the battlefield but also in terms of crusader morale. Fought in 1192 the battle of Jaffa secured the Latin's dominance in the battlefield. In it's recapture the Latin's had displayed a brilliant strike surprisingly from the coast but more impressive had been its defence.

  1. To what extent was the first crusade a success

    of the crusade and decided to head into Asia Minor towards Nicaea on a raiding party, hear they showed a complete lack of discipline and were massacred in their captured castle at Xerigordon, most were killed or given the option to convert, the army was split into two parts the

  2. Why People Went On Crusade

    The warriors were already convinced that God approved of their fighting, and that their warrior skills were more valuable to God than the clergy's praying. The warriors took up the concept of the crusade with enthusiasm because it fitted their own ideas about what fighting was for2.

  1. The First English Civil War

    or lay fenced with rivers or defiles. Here were no leaguers in the field, as at the story of Nuremberg, 'neither had our soldiers any tents, or what they call heavy baggage.' Twas the general maxim of the war: Where is the enemy? Let us go and fight them.

  2. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    Among the dead was Walter Golyakov. Sultan Kilic Arslan, hoped to defeat the new enemy forces in the same easy way, and therefore did not take seriously the approaching enemy. But he was cruelly disappointed. His easy armed, with bows and arrows, cavalry was easily defeated by Western cavalry in open battle.

  1. In calling the first crusade, Urban 2nd was primarily motivated by a desire to ...

    and low status had no choice but to go against the Ten Commandments and fight for many reasons. This made many heavy with guilt and fear of eternal damnation in Hell. However it was the Popes job to lift as many people to the divine land as possible, thus by

  2. To what extent was superior military leadership the reason for success in the first ...

    has to be absolutely key for understanding the success of the first crusade. The initial success for the first crusade relied upon the religious beliefs of the western world. They were highly motivated by their religious zeal which was manipulated by Pope Urban II.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work