Why Did Stalemate Develop On The Western Front?

Authors Avatar

The following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the Western Front was finally broken:

1. New technologies like the tank.

2. The American entry into the war

3. The blockading of German Ports

4. The German offensive in March 1918

Explain how far you agree with this statement

All of the four reasons above do play a part in breaking the stalemate on the Western Front but I disagree that they were equally important.  They are also not the only reasons.

Firstly I will talk about “New technologies like the tank”.  This is an indirect reason.  The tank had potential but technology wasn’t sufficiently advanced at the time.  Tanks were too slow and the Germans soon came up with a counter to it.  They made special groups of people who where housed in concrete bunkers that could easily destroy the slow moving tanks using field guns.  The tank did however provide a shield for infantry, flatten the barbed wire defences and breakthrough the lines.  Tanks could never manage a breakout though because of there slowness and limited range.  Newer versions of the tank were made throughout the war up to the Mark V and the smaller, lighter armoured whippet.  These were still slow and unreliable though.  The main thing it did though was give the Allies a psychological advantage over the Germans.  The only time the tank was successful was at the Battle of Cambrai.  Here there were massive losses of tanks but they completed there objectives.  In one part of the line it made the Germans runaway because they were so scared of it.

Join now!

        By comparison in the 2nd World War tanks stopped a stalemate even occurring.  They were fast, powerful and the main weapon of the battlefield commander.

        The tank was not the only new technology.  There was also the grenade, flamethrower and gas/smoke shells.  These are just a selection.  One of the most important technological advances was the machine gun.  The Germans used the Maxim, English the Vickers/Lewis and French the Chauchat.  I am not going into these weapons because either they didn’t play a major role, gas for example only killed 7% of the casualties it caused and the survivors usually recovered ...

This is a preview of the whole essay