• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Did Stalemate Develop On The Western Front?

Extracts from this document...


The following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the Western Front was finally broken: 1. New technologies like the tank. 2. The American entry into the war 3. The blockading of German Ports 4. The German offensive in March 1918 Explain how far you agree with this statement All of the four reasons above do play a part in breaking the stalemate on the Western Front but I disagree that they were equally important. They are also not the only reasons. Firstly I will talk about "New technologies like the tank". This is an indirect reason. The tank had potential but technology wasn't sufficiently advanced at the time. Tanks were too slow and the Germans soon came up with a counter to it. They made special groups of people who where housed in concrete bunkers that could easily destroy the slow moving tanks using field guns. The tank did however provide a shield for infantry, flatten the barbed wire defences and breakthrough the lines. Tanks could never manage a breakout though because of there slowness and limited range. Newer versions of the tank were made throughout the war up to the Mark V and the smaller, lighter armoured whippet. ...read more.


It gave the Allies the key element of surprise. This was also complimented with the rolling barrage which gave the infantry a shield of shells. Secondly "The American entry into the war". The Americans didn't enter because of one reason but because of several. During the war when America was neutral on May 1, 1915 Lusitania left New York for the final time. A number of Americans were aboard, including the wealthy Alfred Vanderbilt and noted theatre producer Charles Frohman. On May 7 with the coast of Ireland in sight, German U-boat U-20 torpedoed Lusitania. Sinking in eighteen minutes with the loss of 1,195 lives - 123 of them American. This incident really turned the American people against the Germans. This was not helped by a secret telegram sent by the Germans to the Mexicans which was intercepted by the British and decoded. It was sent by Zimmerman the German foreign minister on the 15th March telling Mexico to attack the USA. Germany wanted them to reclaim all their rightful states like Arizona, Colorado, Texas; America declared war on Germany on April 6th 1917. They had massive problems mobilising their army that finally arrived in Europe on May 1st. ...read more.


Also some troops deserted because they had lost faith in there generals. The surviving troops suffered from incredibly low morale, severe exhaustion and depression and weapons and munitions availability declined enormously and because of this the troops concentrated on looting food and weapons from overrun Allied supply dumps rather than preparing for the Allied counter attack. Another crucial error General Ludendorf made was that he had no cavalry to exploit the breakout and he didn't move his artillery up quick enough to protect his remaining troops. He couldn't secure his positions and this is where it started going downhill for the Germans. I conclude therefore that "The American entry into the war" and "The blockading of German Ports" were the two most important reasons. The Americans gave the Allies unlimited amounts of men and resources. The Germans couldn't fight a lasting war because of lack of resources and this is why they attempted their massive offensive in 1918 to win the war at a stroke before the Americans got there act together. The reason they couldn't fight a lasting war was because of the Blockade which stopped them getting food and resources in large quantities that they desperately needed. This is why I disagree with the title. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why the stalemate on the western front was finally broken.

    the opposition couldn't communicate with each other, meaning that enemy couldn't call up for reserves. The tank was a main factor of new technology. The British invented the tank. When they were first invented they could travel at 6KM per hour and were armed with machine guns and cannons.

  2. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front

    It was quick and easy to dig the trenches in France as the land was very flat and was very soft and chalky so trenches could have been dug in a matter of hours. Race to the sea The next battle that took place was the "race to the sea"

  1. The following were equally important reasons why thestalemate on the western front was finally ...

    Russia had withdrawn from the war, the Allies' main problem was how to withstand an imminent German offensive pending the arrival of massive reinforcements from the United States.

  2. Was the USA's entry into the war, the British blockade, Tanks and the German ...

    General Ludendorff used heavy guns and gas attacks to start with. Then small groups of well-armed, well-trained, fast-moving soldiers called "storm troops" broke through at many points in the Allied line. Ludendorff had failed to see the importance of tanks, and in Germany tanks had not been put into production early enough for significant use in 1918.

  1. Why did a gangster culture develop in the USA in the 1920`s to the ...

    If the money wasn't paid, the recipients could expect violence such as kidnappings, bombings, and murder. The methods did not change in the USA when the extorted business did not accept the assimilation to the family it had to fear terror.

  2. Why did Stalemate develop on the western front?

    Moltke was replaced by a new commander. Falkenhayn, who decided to try outflank (get round the end of) his enemy's lines. The charge began on 12 October. It became known as 'the race to the sea.' As the Germans charged west towards the sea, the British and French moved troops

  1. How important was Haig's tactics on the Western Front in bringing an end to ...

    charge of millions of untrained men in a colder climate, with wetter and muddier land. Another considerable change was that this War was completely different to previous wars, in that the rules had changed - the advantage was with the defender, not the attacker.

  2. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front?

    Schlieffen knew of this treaty but did not believe that Britain would uphold it. Schlieffen also believed that because France was so bitter about the loss of Alsace and Lorraine, the French troops would be sent there first which would leave the capital open and vulnerable to attack.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work