• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Did Stalemate Develop On The Western Front?

Extracts from this document...


The following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the Western Front was finally broken: 1. New technologies like the tank. 2. The American entry into the war 3. The blockading of German Ports 4. The German offensive in March 1918 Explain how far you agree with this statement All of the four reasons above do play a part in breaking the stalemate on the Western Front but I disagree that they were equally important. They are also not the only reasons. Firstly I will talk about "New technologies like the tank". This is an indirect reason. The tank had potential but technology wasn't sufficiently advanced at the time. Tanks were too slow and the Germans soon came up with a counter to it. They made special groups of people who where housed in concrete bunkers that could easily destroy the slow moving tanks using field guns. The tank did however provide a shield for infantry, flatten the barbed wire defences and breakthrough the lines. Tanks could never manage a breakout though because of there slowness and limited range. Newer versions of the tank were made throughout the war up to the Mark V and the smaller, lighter armoured whippet. ...read more.


It gave the Allies the key element of surprise. This was also complimented with the rolling barrage which gave the infantry a shield of shells. Secondly "The American entry into the war". The Americans didn't enter because of one reason but because of several. During the war when America was neutral on May 1, 1915 Lusitania left New York for the final time. A number of Americans were aboard, including the wealthy Alfred Vanderbilt and noted theatre producer Charles Frohman. On May 7 with the coast of Ireland in sight, German U-boat U-20 torpedoed Lusitania. Sinking in eighteen minutes with the loss of 1,195 lives - 123 of them American. This incident really turned the American people against the Germans. This was not helped by a secret telegram sent by the Germans to the Mexicans which was intercepted by the British and decoded. It was sent by Zimmerman the German foreign minister on the 15th March telling Mexico to attack the USA. Germany wanted them to reclaim all their rightful states like Arizona, Colorado, Texas; America declared war on Germany on April 6th 1917. They had massive problems mobilising their army that finally arrived in Europe on May 1st. ...read more.


Also some troops deserted because they had lost faith in there generals. The surviving troops suffered from incredibly low morale, severe exhaustion and depression and weapons and munitions availability declined enormously and because of this the troops concentrated on looting food and weapons from overrun Allied supply dumps rather than preparing for the Allied counter attack. Another crucial error General Ludendorf made was that he had no cavalry to exploit the breakout and he didn't move his artillery up quick enough to protect his remaining troops. He couldn't secure his positions and this is where it started going downhill for the Germans. I conclude therefore that "The American entry into the war" and "The blockading of German Ports" were the two most important reasons. The Americans gave the Allies unlimited amounts of men and resources. The Germans couldn't fight a lasting war because of lack of resources and this is why they attempted their massive offensive in 1918 to win the war at a stroke before the Americans got there act together. The reason they couldn't fight a lasting war was because of the Blockade which stopped them getting food and resources in large quantities that they desperately needed. This is why I disagree with the title. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why the stalemate on the western front was finally broken.

    the opposition couldn't communicate with each other, meaning that enemy couldn't call up for reserves. The tank was a main factor of new technology. The British invented the tank. When they were first invented they could travel at 6KM per hour and were armed with machine guns and cannons.

  2. Account for the development of stalemate on the Western Front by the end of ...

    Furthermore, the size of armies was intensified by the use of horses, which took up more space than food and ammunition. One of the earliest battles that saw massive blows to the size of the armies was the First battle of Ypres, as described by John Terraine in The Great

  1. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front

    It was quick and easy to dig the trenches in France as the land was very flat and was very soft and chalky so trenches could have been dug in a matter of hours. Race to the sea The next battle that took place was the "race to the sea"

  2. What Broke the Stalemate Stalemate is the word used to describe the situation on ...

    in the war it wasn't used effectively except from on a few occasions like at Ypres. Out of all of the weapons heavy artillery was the most effective as it gave the ability to shell a trench for days then storm it when it hopefully had no-one left in it, but it rarely worked like that.

  1. The following were equally important reasons why thestalemate on the western front was finally ...

    The aggressive navies were employed as much in interfering with commerce as in fighting each other. Immediately after the outbreak of war, the British had instituted an economic blockade of Germany, with the aim of preventing all supplies reaching that country from the outside world.

  2. Was the USA's entry into the war, the British blockade, Tanks and the German ...

    The attack caught the Germans by surprise in the early morning. Then the tanks began to move forward, crashing through the wire, and leading the infantry and cavalry through. The Allies managed to capture 8000 of the enemy and 100 guns.

  1. Why did a gangster culture develop in the USA in the 1920`s to the ...

    In the initial phase of the world economy crisis the prohibition opponents argued convincing, that that the prohibition disabled the increase of jobs and the income of taxes it also added the stagnation of the economy. In December 1933 the US congress with great majority discharged the 21st condition addition, with which the 18th addition, the Prohibition, was cancelled.

  2. How important was Haig's tactics on the Western Front in bringing an end to ...

    He believed in several theory's, such as one must never shrink from an attack, wear enemy down and then send in cavalry, and in a war of attrition ( where numbers on each side were significant). As a person, Haig was very religious and was more comfortable with the idea of death than some of his men may have been.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work