• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Stalin Emerge as Leader of Russia by 1929?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Stalin Emerge as Leader of Russia by 1929? On the 21st January 1924, Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, leader of Russia's socialist revolution, which resulted in the establishment of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) as well as the first head of the Soviet state, died aged 54. The people of the newly established Soviet Union had been expecting with trepidation the demise of their great leader, aware that it would be difficult to replace a leader of the stature of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin. Lenin's, fellow leaders of the Bolshevik party and other significant revolutionary figures engaged in intense discussion as to who would best succeed the Bolshevik head. Lenin had been very much the father figure of the formation of the Soviet Union, being an absolute leader in the extreme circumstances of winning the civil war which consolidated the revolutionary state. Through this success of securing the revolutions continued existence beyond its birth, Lenin was respected and highly popular. Therefore, as of 1924, there was a huge power struggle amongst those wanting to replace Lenin as leader of the nation that had been wracked by a post revolutionary civil war for so many years. ...read more.

Middle

Trotsky argued that a communist revolution in the USSR alone could not succeed because the working class in the USSR was far too small, and the economy was underdeveloped. It was therefore essential that the USSR be joined by other revolutionary states, there was great hopes that Germany would have a socialist revolution, and for a short time after the end of World War I it seemed possible that Germany would embark upon a revolutionary path, but this was repressed by the forces of the right wing in Germany, a major setback for the 'permanent revolution' outlook within the Bolsheviks, similarly the defeat of the revolution in the brief Hungarian socialist revolution of Bela Kun made many within the Bolsheviks see that perhaps a more realistic strategy would have to be developed to defend the USSR. Against this was the desire for Socialism in One Country, the policy put forward by Stalin at the end of 1924. This would mean concentrating on the development and defence of socialism within Russia alone. Stalin was keen on setting an example for other countries to follow and admire. Stalin argued against the idea that 'revolution could be exported' and suggested that revolutions in other countries do not occur when needed by the Bolsheviks, but happened, if at all, only when conditions were right within those states. ...read more.

Conclusion

He instead advocated rapid industrialisation as well as the use of force to make the peasants co-operate. Having advanced a strong defence of the NEP, Bukharin was easily outvoted in the congress of 1929, it having a majority of delegates who supported Stalin's position. Now the main figures of the right wing of the party, Bukharin, Tomsky, and Rykov were removed from the Politburo, giving Stalin and the group around him absolute sole command and power. Stalin had succeeded overall, mainly due to his key position as Secretary of the Party, being able to control the party's structures and procedures, and having control of all information. Stalin was able to be flexible with his policy positions, to be flexible in order to make alliances which would in turn defeat his rivals one by one. Within his own personality, he was easy to underestimate, with the appearance of being dull and unimaginative; he was in fact hard working, determined, and ruthless. Stalin was always underestimated by his opponents, and was able to surprise those standing in his way, with the ability to change his policies entirely in order to eliminate his opponents. Joseph Stalin was now in position to govern Russia, and would so from an era of 24 years, 1929 to his death in 1953. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. What were the causes of the disintegration of the Soviet Union as a socialist ...

    be argued later, economic problems that forced Gorbachev to carry out reforms that would finally destroy the system. It is possible, therefore, to suggest that there are some inherent problems associated with a centrally planned economy, although it is very difficult to say fore sure that these flaws are by definition an aspect of a planned economy.

  2. The Hollywood Ten - House Un-American Activities Committee.

    * Walk on the Wild Side (1962) * The Carpetbaggers (1963) * Where Love Has Gone (1964) * Mirage (1965) * Alvarez Kelly (1966) * The Battle for Anzi (1968) * Shalako (1968) * Barbe-Bleue (1972) * The Human Factor (1975) * Hollywood on Trial (1976) Video/C 5751 Other Films of Interest: * The Front (1976)

  1. The Deer Hunter and Apocalypse Now

    The My Lai massacre certainly raised the public eyebrow, forcing us to take a closer look at the higher ranked military officials who were giving orders. The Peers Commission determined that Calley was the one who gave the final word to the infantry troops which allowed the massacre to occur.

  2. Why was it Stalin that won the leadership struggle by 1928 in the USSR?

    The power struggle lay mainly between thee two men, however other contenders included Left-wingers Zinoviev and Kamenev and Right-wingers included Rykov, Tomsky and Bukharin. After Lenin's death, Stalin joined forces with Zinoviev and Kamenev (to form a triumvirate), who feared Trotsky, a fellow Left-winger would dismiss them from their positions,

  1. UNIT 6: PAPER 6b: THE SOVIET UNION AFTER LENIN

    These three controlled the key posts in the Party. Trotsky's power base was the Red Army. * Trotsky criticised the Party over economic policy, bureaucratisation, permanent revolution, and the ban on factions. * Trotsky was also repeatedly ill during this period.

  2. The Era of Good Feelings

    Thomas Jefferson once said of the bank: [The] Bank of the United States... is one of the most deadly hostility existing, against the principles and form of our Constitution... An institution like this, penetrating by its branches every part of the Union, acting by command and in phalanx, may, in a critical moment, upset the government.

  1. What are the complexities in 'complex emergencies'?

    However, when the phenomena of natural disasters are combined with a situation such as civil war, the circumstances of relief and development become much less 'black and white' for the International Community. This is because aid is seen by opposing factions (quite rightly)

  2. In the context of the period 1905-2005, how far do you agree that Khrushchev ...

    Similarly the Soviet Union?s GNP had fallen from 5.2 percent in 1970, to 2.2 percent in 1980.[17] It appears that the effects of decentralisation were beneficial and a reversal of such policies would therefore counter-track production: which is seen under the centralised economy of Brezhnev.[18] The fact that Khrushchev?s policies

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work