• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Stalin, Rather than Trotsky, Emerge as Leader of the USSR by 1929?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Shai Manor History 12A IB 06/09/04 Why did Stalin, Rather than Trotsky, Emerge as Leader of the USSR by 1929? After Lenin's death the Bolsheviks were committed to selecting a new leader. The main contestants were Stalin and Trotsky. When Lenin was in the last stage of his life he came to see Stalin was not the "great Georgian" he always called him, but a fierce dictator who would change the USSR forever. In 1929 the Georgian forced his authority and took over the Bolshevik party. Stalin's personal characteristics and qualities helped him become leader of the party. One personal characteristic which the public liked was that he was of proletarian roots himself and therefore would not cause splits within the party. Terry Morris also suggests that: "He was blameless and uncomplicated." Some characteristics differing from the highly complex rivals. ...read more.

Middle

They where both members of the Politburo and had high ranked roles in the government. Stalin, being the General Secretary, appointed his supporters to key positions in the party. It is logical that if he could do that, he could also expel Trotsky's supporters. Furthermore, he would exchange those expelled with even more of his supporters. According to Robert D. Warth, Stalin had replaced 37 of the 50 party secretaries, which is more than half of them! Stalin was politically very skilful and cunning. Stalin had his own view of the New Economic Policy and decided to make Russia's industrialization grow more rapidly. This idea was supported by the greater part of party members. Socialism in one country was another thing that appealed the public; the party members did not want an everlasting revolution. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although Stalin was very powerful, Trotsky may be the reason for his own defeat. He had only joined the Bolshevik party in 1917; he was a Menshevik until then. Therefore he was not seen as a loyal party member. Furthermore, many Bolsheviks did not trust him and thought, since he had the army on his side, that he would try to become the dictator. Trotsky underestimated Stalin and therefore lost the power he could have had. He was seen as high-minded and arrogant, rude towards his colleagues and was seen as the person to make "splits within the party". Conclusion By the end of 1926 Trotsky was voted off the Politburo, and in October1927 he lost his place in the central committee. One month later he even got expelled from the Bolshevik party and was exiled in January of 1928 to Soviet Asia. Stalin then emerged as Lenin's full successor. Word count: 758 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    Lenin's conversion of the Central Committee to his point of view in October may be dealt with in a similar manner. Returning from Finland to find the Bolshevik leadership generally cool towards the idea of an early insurrection, Lenin launched a vigorous personal campaign to change their minds.

  2. Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of the Soviet Union ...

    As a result the highly significant institutional positions of Stalin, and the lower positions of his rivals allowed Stalin to gather an essential support base which eventually lead to his takeover of power. .....................................Stalin's personal qualities contributed to his own appearance as leader of the Soviet Union.

  1. Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of the USSR in ...

    Moreover, Trotsky himself was responsible for his own downfall to a certain extent. He had weaknesses that made him unfit for the power struggle. Trotsky had only joined the Bolsheviks in August 1917 and was not seen as loyal member of the party.

  2. Why did Stalin, Rather than Trotsky emerge as leader of the USSR in 1929

    For example, unlike Trotsky he was a very loyal member and had proletariat roots, and he was perceived by many to have no real reason to cause splits with in the party. Stalin was also perceived as dull and mediocre the 'grey blur' and so no one saw him as a real threat.

  1. How did Stalin Rather Than His Rivals Manage To Secure Power In 1929?

    On the contrary to Trotsky's popularity, Stalin's rivals did not really consider him a serious threat, they underestimated his ability as a leader, or as a tactful politician. "He was not a charismatic figure, a fine orator, or a distinguished Marxist theoretician like Lenin or Trotsky.

  2. Why did Stalin and not Trotsky emerge as the leader of the USSR by ...

    Stalin decided not to be too obvious in his attack on Trotsky, leaving his partners Zinoniev and Kamenev to do the sliming. He maintained a normal, if not warm, relationship with Trotsky. Trotsky was seen as a main contender, with Zinoniev and Kamenev being his rivals.

  1. Why did Stalin emerge as leader of Soviet Russia?

    Stalin clearly attacked Trotsky first as he knew that he was a strong contender for the position of leader of Soviet Russia, so by eradicating the support he may have once obtained, he strengthened his own chances of emerging as leader.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Children denied education. 3. 1928 ? many given hard labour. 4. Had their property confiscated. This showed how far the Party were willing to go in order to achieve their main goal: socialism. Kulaks did not like this as they were benefiting greatly from the half-Capitalist, half-Socialist policy that was the NEP.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work