• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Stalin, rather than Trotsky, emerge as leader of USSR in 1929?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Stalin, rather than Trotsky, emerge as leader of USSR in 1929? Following the death of Lenin in January 1924, the Bolshevik party was left without its Messiah. The Bolsheviks were prepared for Lenin's death and the two main rivals to take his place as leader were Stalin and Trotsky. Trotsky was Lenin's accomplice and war hero and it seemed that Trotsky would be the natural replacement. However, Stalin who was labelled as "too rude" by Lenin and "the grey blur" by Trotsky had complete control of the party and government by 1929. There are many reasons for this as follows: Lenin worked to Stalin's advantage. Before Lenin's death he had laid the foundations for his rise to power as he was made General secretary of the Communist party in 1922 and since he was the only link between the party and government he knew the workings of both. He used his position to gain information. For example Lenin's house was bugged in order to keep Stalin supplied with data. ...read more.

Middle

This quote means that Trotsky is criticising Stalin's supporters of being willing to do anything for Stalin in their loyalty to him. Trotsky's lack of political tact and his arrogance towards the party membership left him without support within the party. Even if he did ignore the main body of the party, Trotsky still could have gained and maintained power if he skilfully forged alliances with the politburo. But his individualisation led him to trouble again because his constant bickering with Kamenev and Zinoviev, led to Kamenev publishing his own pamphlet "Lenin or Trotsky" which showed the contrast between the two. The pamphlet said that Trotsky was an ex- Menshevik who joined the Bolsheviks only when it was clear that this would be the winning side. This angered Trotsky and Stalin, Kamenev and Zinoviev all formed a triumvirate, where they all joined together to keep Trotsky from gaining power. Trotsky's only hope by this time was to release Lenin's testament, which condemned all three of the triumvirate and dismissed Stalin to such an extent that Stalin's chance of succession would have been ruined. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin was able to disgrace Trotsky in the eyes of the Russian people and would later have him exiled. Stalin now had Trotsky's opposition silenced. All he had to do now was remove his only remaining threat, which were Kamenev and Zinoviev. To do this he allied with the Bukharin over NEP. He objectives like the Pravda newspaper to misrepresent them. He sent Kirov to undermine Zinoviev's position as Leningrad party secretary. By 1927 Kamenev and Zinoviev had been weakened so much that they recanted all opposition to Stalin. Again Stalin exploited his position in the party to remove all opposition. In conclusion Trotsky ruined all of his chances to gain power whereas Stalin was skilful enough to exploit his power. The challenge never really began between him and Trotsky due to the fact that he was able to make people believe that he was Lenin' chosen successor. By the time Stalin had complete control in 1929, the Bolsheviks didn't have much in common with Lenin's ideological elite group. Stalin moulded it into a dictatorship supported by a mass bureaucracy, of which he had control. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Who gained the most from the Lichfield House Compact

    O'Connell hadn't even agreed with the Poor Law and didn't support it at all. He had wanted a public works scheme, and he knew that the Poor Law wouldn't address the problem. In reality he was true. O'Connell had voted against the act, which shows he himself is not happy at all with the legislation.

  2. Stalin Vs. Trotsky.

    He attended school in Odessa, developing an early brilliance and bookishness. He reports his observation of the composition of his class: "the tale-bearers and envious at one pole, the frank, courageous boys at the other, and the neutral, vacillating mass in the middle."

  1. How did Stalin Rise to Power between 1922 – 1929?

    description of Stalin: "Stalin was in no way designed to be an idol of the masses: He was neither a demonic, hypnotic figure like Hitler or Mussolini, who could impart emotions to millions, nor a 'Pied Piper,' seductive in leadership.

  2. Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of the Soviet Union ...

    though Lenin was disregarding Lenin and being disrespectful to an important leader. This was a huge benefit on Stalin's part as the funeral allowed him to advance his position as the successive leader of the Soviet Union. Stalin was perceived as dull and mediocre and "grey blur" was the term used to describe him.

  1. Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of the USSR in ...

    He outmanoeuvred his opponents turning them against each other. Stalin was very scheming; he tricked Trotsky into not turning up for Lenin's funeral so he could advance his position. Trotsky's reputation was damaged within the party. Secondly, Luck was on Stalin's side as Lenin and Sverdlov died at the right

  2. Stalin and Trotsky

    The fact that the words within the bubbles are being blown away suggests that the dreams of individuals within the society are also floating away. The book in the cartoon represents Trotsky as an intellectual character, however the socialist structure itself, is making it more challenging for workers and the

  1. Why did Stalin emerge as leader of Soviet Russia?

    His first action was the formation of the Triumvirate, which aimed to keep Trotsky out of power. Stalin formed the alliance with Zinoviev and Kamenev with the objective of helping to take down Trotsky as well as gaining their support which he most needed and therefore desired.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The industrial revolution would provide the wealth which would then enable the construction of a society that would provide a secure existence for the Soviet people ï Marxist theory; all wealth should belong to the people instead of to capitalists who exploited ordinary people to line their own pockets.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work