• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Stalin, rather than Trotsky, emerge as leader of USSR in 1929?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Stalin, rather than Trotsky, emerge as leader of USSR in 1929? Following the death of Lenin in January 1924, the Bolshevik party was left without its Messiah. The Bolsheviks were prepared for Lenin's death and the two main rivals to take his place as leader were Stalin and Trotsky. Trotsky was Lenin's accomplice and war hero and it seemed that Trotsky would be the natural replacement. However, Stalin who was labelled as "too rude" by Lenin and "the grey blur" by Trotsky had complete control of the party and government by 1929. There are many reasons for this as follows: Lenin worked to Stalin's advantage. Before Lenin's death he had laid the foundations for his rise to power as he was made General secretary of the Communist party in 1922 and since he was the only link between the party and government he knew the workings of both. He used his position to gain information. For example Lenin's house was bugged in order to keep Stalin supplied with data. ...read more.

Middle

This quote means that Trotsky is criticising Stalin's supporters of being willing to do anything for Stalin in their loyalty to him. Trotsky's lack of political tact and his arrogance towards the party membership left him without support within the party. Even if he did ignore the main body of the party, Trotsky still could have gained and maintained power if he skilfully forged alliances with the politburo. But his individualisation led him to trouble again because his constant bickering with Kamenev and Zinoviev, led to Kamenev publishing his own pamphlet "Lenin or Trotsky" which showed the contrast between the two. The pamphlet said that Trotsky was an ex- Menshevik who joined the Bolsheviks only when it was clear that this would be the winning side. This angered Trotsky and Stalin, Kamenev and Zinoviev all formed a triumvirate, where they all joined together to keep Trotsky from gaining power. Trotsky's only hope by this time was to release Lenin's testament, which condemned all three of the triumvirate and dismissed Stalin to such an extent that Stalin's chance of succession would have been ruined. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin was able to disgrace Trotsky in the eyes of the Russian people and would later have him exiled. Stalin now had Trotsky's opposition silenced. All he had to do now was remove his only remaining threat, which were Kamenev and Zinoviev. To do this he allied with the Bukharin over NEP. He objectives like the Pravda newspaper to misrepresent them. He sent Kirov to undermine Zinoviev's position as Leningrad party secretary. By 1927 Kamenev and Zinoviev had been weakened so much that they recanted all opposition to Stalin. Again Stalin exploited his position in the party to remove all opposition. In conclusion Trotsky ruined all of his chances to gain power whereas Stalin was skilful enough to exploit his power. The challenge never really began between him and Trotsky due to the fact that he was able to make people believe that he was Lenin' chosen successor. By the time Stalin had complete control in 1929, the Bolsheviks didn't have much in common with Lenin's ideological elite group. Stalin moulded it into a dictatorship supported by a mass bureaucracy, of which he had control. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalin Vs. Trotsky.

    He was to apply the same threefold classification to his fellow revolutionaries and fellow citizens of the Empire and the world. In his teens he went to Nikolaev, met a number of populists, became enamored of a girl in the group, and accepted the populist doctrine.

  2. How did Stalin Rise to Power between 1922 – 1929?

    as an uninvolved Bolshevik, in case of failure...[or] in the urgency of organizing the coup, those chiefly concerned...called in only those felt immediately necessary, and Stalin's name did not occur to them."6 The second theory may hold more truth, and in fact it seems more plausible when one considers Laqueur's

  1. Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of the Soviet Union ...

    He was politically skilful and very cunning, which is exemplified by his manipulation of Lenin's funeral from which he prevented Trotsky attending by purposely telling him the wrong date. Trotsky absence from the funeral portrayed him in a negative light for the rest of the population because it seemed as

  2. Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of theUSSR in 1929?

    Through his policies, Stalin was able to help in his rise to power. He adapted his policies regularly to make sure that people would agree with him around that time. He also made sure that the majority of the party agreed with the policies he adopted.

  1. The Hidden Facets of Bolshevism - Friends and Foes of the Working Class.

    It represented one of the former rulers of Russia riding a huge stallion. "One cannot but be struck by the tremendous strength of the animal and the frailty of the rider" (124). Bolshevism was a wild horse, fierce, untamed, powerful, which might wake up any moment and cast off its burden.

  2. Who gained the most from the Lichfield House Compact

    It was quite minor legislation having a positive impact on the people without the government giving too much away. Peace meant England was now in control! The next reform that the Whigs introduced was the Poor Law in 1838. In the 1820s and 1830s poverty was getting worse in Ireland.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Much less emphasis on nationalism and more focus on the USSR. 2. The initial class warfare after the revolution was replaced with a more inclusive approach to society. However? 1. The party did not have resources, and the mass of the population was not enthusiastic enough, to ensure that its

  2. Why did Stalin emerge as leader of Soviet Russia?

    His first action was the formation of the Triumvirate, which aimed to keep Trotsky out of power. Stalin formed the alliance with Zinoviev and Kamenev with the objective of helping to take down Trotsky as well as gaining their support which he most needed and therefore desired.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work