• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of the Soviet Union by 1929?

Extracts from this document...


Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of the Soviet Union by 1929? Trotsky was the most well-known replacement for Lenin as he was the only member who could rival Lenin in intellect and his writings on Marxist theory. Trotsky's impressive revolutionary record saw him make an invaluable contribution to the rise of the Bolshevik party between 1917 to 1924, yet it was Stalin, a man called upon by Lenin in his testament to be sacked through his rude nature and lack of tolerance who succeeded Lenin in a long hard-fought battle for leadership of the Soviet Union. There are numerous factors which contributed to the recognition as Stalin as leader, including Trotsky's weaknesses, Stalin's tactical and ideological manoeuvring and his own skilful personal qualities. However I believe the most significant reason to Stalin's emergence as leader was his control of key institutions the Communist Party which stripped his opponents of power and left him as the only candidate left undefeated. The most important reason as to why Stalin emerged as leader was because he held key positions within the three most significant institutions within the Russian government, the Politburo the main organ of power, Orgburo which made important decisions about organizational work in Russia and arguably most importantly General secretary which meant he ...read more.


.................................... ................................Stalin's strategic schemes continued to play a dominating role and he was able to become leader of Russia due to his skill at tactical manoeuvring. For example in 1923 Stalin united forces with Zinoviev and Kamenev and formed the Triumvirate in an attempt to get rid of Trotsky, however this was their only common objective and once Trotsky had been defeated in the Thirteenth party congress in 1924, the triumvirate disintegrated Stalin moved towards the right side. Therefore Stalin strategically placed himself in different positions between the extreme left and right and adopted different polices in regards to the New Economic Policy, this capricious change meant he could change positions whenever it suited him..Stalin's commitment to the New Economic Policy depended on its success and once it began to fail Stalin broke his alliance with Bukharin in 1928 and advocated rapid industrialisation, the very policy he had previously rejected. Through tactical manoeuvring Stalin was able to remove opponents by forming alliances and using these alliances to defeat those who opposed him. Along with tactical manoeuvring Stalin changed his ideologies about the future of Russia in n attempt to gain support. Stalin advocated the patriotic ideology of Socialism in Once Country which appealed to those on the right wing and fitted with their policy of New Economic Policy, their own route to socialism hence leading to his alliance with Bukharin in 1925. ...read more.


Trotsky could also no longer handle the political attacks mounted on him by opponents and therefore was an easy target for Stalin to manipulate and overthrow in 1924 through triumvirate, the alliance Stalin made with Zinoviev and Kamenev to destroy Trotsky's reputation and ensure he would never lead the communists. Taking everything into consideration despite Stalin being referred to as "Grey Blur", his ideological battles such as his adoption of the left-wing policy when the New Economic Policy was failing and tactical manoeuvring helped to assure his victory, nevertheless Stalin's control of the party machine gave him the powerbase which Trotsky lacked. Stalin was appointed to three key institutions within the Russian government which showed how much his reputation had grown and how much trust Lenin placed in him. Trotsky did not have deceitful the character required for such a power struggle, and had many attributes which backfired against him including his original roots as a Menshevik and his position as leader of the Red Army. Ultimately it was Stalin who carried forward the concepts of Leninism by representing both rival interpretations of Leninism by moving between left and right wings. Therefore i believe it was Stalin who won the struggle for power through his own advantages. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Russia and the Soviet Union 1917-1924

    fired a blank shot to start the attack. There was little machine-gun fire, and very little damage was done to the palace. The women's death battalion offered no resistance, came out and went back to camp. The red guards entered and made their way along the miles of corridors.

  2. Why did Stalin emerge as leader of Russia 1928-1929?

    Stalin was able to use this system to remove his rivals from power by accusing them of factionalism. Additionally, Stalin was able to use Lenin's writings to gain power. Lenin's writings were often vague and seemed to contradict themselves. Stalin was able to claim that his ideology was the same as Lenin's.

  1. .Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin and Stalin had many ...

    Coal 35.4 64.3 128 (million tonnes) Oil 11.7 21.4 28.5 (million tonnes) Pig Iron 3.3 6.2 14.5 (million tonnes) Steel 4 5.9 17.7 (million tonnes) The cost of Stalin's Five- Year Plans was paid by the suffering of it workers. New industrial zones, towns, and cities were set up-often with poor quality housing.

  2. Why did Stalin, rather than Trotsky, emerge as leader of USSR in 1929?

    Trotsky seemed unLeninist. Stalin tried to show that he was a voice of authority when he spoke as he always used the words "as Lenin said" this made Trotsky out to be a dissident. This also showed that Stalin was a natural successor to Lenin, especially as Stalin was present

  1. The weaknesses of the Left Opposition were responsible for Stalins victory in the Soviet ...

    shops and markets in cities to make sure that the people in the big cities are calm. Stalin had manages to isolate Trotsky from Lenin's funeral, this would mean that no major representative of the Left attended Lenin's funeral, this would have made Stalin generally look a stronger candidate as opposed to Trotsky who did not attend.

  2. Why did Stalin, Rather than Trotsky emerge as leader of the USSR in 1929

    One of Trotsky's main weaknesses was that he did not go out of his way to build up his power base in the party and he allowed Stalin to erode the one he already had. Trotsky at first did not see Stain as a threat and he underestimated Stalin, and in the end he was outmaneuvered by him.

  1. Why did Stalin emerge as leader of Soviet Russia?

    He was also able to not only expel those within the Party once again, but also within the government, reflecting the idea that he could increase his patronage and ensure that government workers who wanted to keep their jobs would remain loyal and not go against him.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Germany was very powerful meaning the USSR must have had considerable strengths. 2. Stalin’s policy of industrialisation meant the USSR had a strong industrial base, allowing it to compete with other powers ï USSR able to significantly out produce Germany in war materials and heavy industry.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work