• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of theUSSR in 1929?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of the USSR in 1929? It is the intention of this essay to explore the reasons why Stalin became the leader of the USSR and not Trotsky. The main reasons for this are the importance of control of party organisation, the policies of both Stalin and Trotsky, Stalin's personal characteristics and political skills and the weaknesses of his opponents, especially Trotsky. Stalin had control over the party organisation through being the party secretary, this job was previously very insignificant, however its importance grew. By having this job, Stalin was able to control, to an extent what information party members received, this therefore meant that if Stalin did not want people to know something, he would be able to stop it. Stalin also had control of party membership, this meant that he could eliminate the more radical elements of the party. Through this position, Stalin supervised the Lenin Enrolment where the party's membership was increased to over one million in 1924 and 1925. This meant that these people would be willing to vote with Stalin and for him when needed. Stalin also held positions in Orgburo and the Secretariat which gave him control over appointments into positions of responsibility. This helped in his rise to power as he was able to put members who would support him into these key positions. ...read more.

Middle

Stalin's policies were therefore far more appealing to the Russian people and other party members. Stalin's personal characteristics and political skills were a very important reason why he emerged as the leader of the USSR and not Trotsky. Stalin was a more down to earth and practical person than most other leading party members. This meant that he was able to relate to the people of Russia as well as the many working class members who joined the party during the Lenin Enrolment. His personality also meant that nobody saw him as a threat, they were much more concerned with Trotsky. They also had this idea from Stalin's leadership positions in the party compared to Trotsky's leadership of the red army. Stalin was vastly underestimated, he had been called a 'grey blur' as he was thought of as being so insignificant. Stalin was also able to use Lenin's death very much to his advantage, it can be said that Stalin, was in a way, lucky at the time of Lenin's death as Trotsky had been ill and had been sent out to the south of Russia. Stalin then told Trotsky that he would not make it back for the funeral. The Russian people did not know that Trotsky had been ill and it was seen as though he could not be bothered. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, if Trotsky was not a weak opponent, Stalin would never have been able to build such a strong position within the party, but this was also contributed to by his political skills. Also, the weaknesses of Kamenev and Zinoviev helped Stalin as when they formed the triumvirate to work with Stalin, they were easy to get rid of once they had been used as they were needed. They were too weak to stop Stalin from bringing in supporters who he wanted in the party and they did not join with Trotsky until it was too late. Another main point is that Stalin tricked Trotsky into not going to Lenin's funeral, this made his reputation greatly improved and ensured that he was ahead in the struggle from day one. Stalin was able to do this, partly through luck at Lenin's death, but also through his personal characteristics. This also helped Stalin to use the Lenin legacy and meant that the public would automatically think that Stalin would be a leader like Lenin. Stalin used many situations to his advantage and was able to sit back while other party members destroyed their own reputation, and helped his. He used his political skills to manipulate situations that had been brought about though luck, he changed his policies to fit in with the ideas of the times and used his opponents weaknesses to his advantage. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why did Stalin emerge as leader of Russia 1928-1929?

    Stalin was able to use Lenin's politics and ideology to gain power because Lenin had left behind a political system and political ideas that Stalin was able to exploit. Finally, Stalin cleverly used alliances to gain power. For example, between 1923 and 1925 he was a member of the Triumvirate.

  2. Stalin Vs. Trotsky.

    Zinoviev openly attacked Trotsky and demanded that he retract his "errors." As Stalin had only shortly before opposed Zinoviev's demand for Trotsky's arrest, he found it wise to remain in the background. Trotsky replied to Zinoviev with a cri de coeur which went to the root of his whole position,

  1. How did Stalin, who was illustrated by Leon Trotsky himself as 'the most eminent ...

    Stalin, whom Lenin had previously respected aroused Lenin's distrust which led to a conflict between the two. Lenin allegedly believed that Stalin was as responsible as anyone for the bureaucratic existence of traditional Tsarist elements in the Party's standard procedures.

  2. How did Stalin Rise to Power between 1922 – 1929?

    has unlimited authority concentrated on his hands, and I am not sure whether he always be capable of using that authority with sufficient caution. Comrade Trotsky, on the other hand... is distinguished not only by his outstanding ability. He is personally perhaps the most capable man in the present Central

  1. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    The Bolsheviks had never been fond of the peasants;24 they had conservative tendencies and petty-bourgeois attitudes. However, they would create the profit so desperately needed for industrialisation; without it there would be no socialism. Industrialisation and the Equality of the Proletariat It is crucial to note that Stalin was not the initiator of suppressing the rights of the proletariat.

  2. Why did Stalin emerge as leader of Soviet Russia?

    Stalin was indeed a man who possessed great intelligence when it came to political knowledge; he knew that in order to have the ability to come out as Lenin's replacement, he had to gain support from not only the members of the Party and government, but also the people in whom he was up against.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    were in place under Lenin. 4. Robert Service, a Western historian analysed the continuities in the Soviet regime between Lenin and Stalin. Stalin took the policies and the party in a more extreme direction, but he was building on something already in place.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    To encourage people, ��Stakhanovites�� gave honours and extra rations. This policy of industrialisation saved Russia in the Second World War. For the Russians we have also to analyse both negative and positive things Stalin brought. In terms of bad points, he introduced the terror and fear within the Russia�s inhabitants.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work