• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge of the leader of the USSR in 1929?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge of the leader of the USSR in 1929? Jamie Gibson When answering this question there are 3 main factors to consider: Stalin's strengths, Trotsky's weaknesses, and wildcard factors (luck or chance). Trotsky inadvertently plotted his own downfall, he was simply unequipped for politics and the power struggle, and his place was on the battlefield in a military uniform. Trotsky was an amazing orator but had little interest in politics. You also have to consider the wildcard factors of which no one was in control. The fact that Trotsky missed Lenin's funeral and Stalin was standing next to his coffin convinced some people that Stalin was the right man to lead them. Then there is the most important factor in the power struggle, Stalin's strengths. ...read more.

Middle

Stalin was seen as the 'grey blur' by many people, he rarely spoke in public and when he did, he had little presence or personality however, this mattered little when compared how politically inexperienced Trotsky was. Once Stalin had ousted his opponents the less important party members found Stalin a very useful ally as he had such a tactically sound position as general secretary. Stalin was however lucky that Lenin's testament was not officially released as Lenin was somewhat scathing in his attack on Stalin describing him as dangerous and promoting Trotsky as the next leader nevertheless his wish was never acted upon and not many people other then Lenin saw Stalin as a threat of even as a candidate. Trotsky did not have a power base, a vital factor for support and loyalty in the politburo. ...read more.

Conclusion

At the end of the day, Stalin was more than capable at taking part in political activity and dealing with the bureaucracy of party membership. Trotsky belonged on the battlefield as a commander a position that gained him respect and admiration however, he was in adept to deal with and take part in politics, like the other members he had underestimated Stalin until it was too late and Stalin had already built up a loyal power base. To some extent Trotsky brought about his own failures by underestimating Stalin, failing to build a power base and not really getting involved in politics. Trotsky also fell victim to the wildcard factor falling ill during the power struggle. It was however, Stalin's strengths and his political adeptness, which ultimately secured his position as leader of the USSR. Trotsky's weaknesses only acted as a catalyst to the succession of Stalin, a man described by Trotsky as a "grey blur". ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of the Soviet Union ...

    factionalism in the hope people would turn against him, which meant causing divides of groups within the communist party who aim to control or influence party direction. As a result Stalin devious manipulations in preventing opponents from attending important significant events whilst quietly developing his own powerbase allowed him to

  2. Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of the USSR in ...

    He was seen as the person most likely to cause splits in the party. Trotsky did not go out of his way to develop or build up his power base in the party and this allowe3d Stalin to erode the small one he already had.

  1. Why did Stalin, Rather than Trotsky emerge as leader of the USSR in 1929

    This was important and enabled him to rise to power without anyone really noticing. He was tough and ambitious and determined to protect his power base and make sure that it was him who emerged as leader. Stalin's control of appointment membership made him a useful ally.

  2. Why did Stalin and not Trotsky emerge as the leader of the USSR by ...

    Trotsky reemphasised on his old theory of "permanent revolution", which was basically his stand that communism should spread beyond Russia and that a quick swift proletariat revolution should take place from the bourgeois to the socialist stage. He said that "October" had been the crucial stage in Party history, as

  1. Why did Stalin, rather the Trotsky, emerge as leader of the USSR by 1929?

    He attacked the NEP in 1928, and advocated rapid industrialization. 'Socialism in One Country' was what he used to call out peoples sense of patriotism. He new there was not going to be a world wide Proletariat revolution, thus this way the Russian people feel as they played an important role in history.

  2. Why did Stalin, Rather than Trotsky, Emerge as Leader of the USSR by 1929?

    In other words, he was seen as less high-minded, more down to earth and practical than other leading Bolsheviks, Stalin was ideally suited to managing the bureaucratic and centralized party that had developed. Stalin had control of the party machine through his key positions in the Politburo, Orgburo and as General Secretary.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    the driving force came from Stalin. The Communist Party and Soviet government: The main features of Stalin?s personal dictatorship: 1. A cult of personality. 2. An emphasis on the all-important role of the leader. 3. Control over the population. 4. The use of Terror and propaganda to reinforce control. 5.

  2. Why did Stalin emerge as leader of Soviet Russia?

    He had managed to take down three of the possible contenders, and was now left to defeat Bukharin- something he had obviously planned from the start. Due to the fact the NEP began to fail, Stalin came to the realisation that if he wanted to emerge as leader, he would

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work