• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Stalin, rather the Trotsky, emerge as leader of the USSR by 1929?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Stalin, rather the Trotsky, emerge as leader of the USSR by 1929? Joseph Stalin took the role as the USSR leader, over Trotsky, 5 years after Lenin's death. Lenin died on 21st January 1924, and Stalin won the power struggle over Trotsky in 1929. Why did Stalin, and not Trotsky, succeed Lenin? There were many for which Stalin got the upper-hand in this power struggle. Stalin was a cunning and skilled politician and was able to get power and influence through his 'bureaucratic' jobs, which were considered not to be important. He was able to use every 'promotion' in the Bolshevik party to his advantage. He led the workers and the peasant's inspectorate through the Orgburo, and the Politburo. And by heading these two key organizations, he had the control of the party machine. Being the chief editor of the Pravda, he took an active involvement in the Bolshevik party. ...read more.

Middle

Stalin was never in the lime light most his Lenin's life, therefore, he was not considered as a candidate to succeed Lenin. He was a strong and brutal man, and it got too late to realize that he would do anything to get his power. Once he realized that Lenin was unable to remove him from his authority; since he was in charge Lenin's security having the power to deny access to any one, he threatened Lenin's wife in not reveling the letter in which Lenin denounced Stalin as his successor and said Trotsky would be a better leader. Another factor that helped Stalin get his power was the fact that Lenin and Sverdlov died at the right time. He headed Lenin's funeral, and showed that he was the Lenin's disciple and the right person to succeed Lenin as the leader of the USSR. Stalin's changed some of Lenin's policies and made promises, which became popular with the people of Russia and the Communists regime. ...read more.

Conclusion

He did not realized that Stalin had built a strong base of power, and underestimated Stalin himself, and Stalin used his political skill and cunningness to out maneuver Trotsky. Stalin emerged as the new leader of the USSR 5 years after Lenin's death because of various reasons. But if explained simply, Stalin was a cunning and skillful politician; he got the right jobs which gave him power to build his own party of supporters. He was never seen as a threat to Trotsky, and always shown as a good man to the public, because of his peasant background; people felt that they he knew what they were going threw, and thus trust him. Trotsky's was his own weakness, since he was not willing to fight back as a politician, he was unable to get the support inside the party that he needed. He was a good orator, but could not get the positions in the party with his own people to get the power over Stalin. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of the Soviet Union ...

    This implies Stalin cleverly stayed in the background pretending to be a moderate peacemaker, for example when Zinoviev and Kamenev were viscously attacking Trotsky Stalin refused to get involved in the heated debates and therefore kept his reputation intact. Therefore no-one saw him as a real threat before it was too late.

  2. Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of the USSR in ...

    time for Stalin and he was able to play to these strengths that favoured him. Trotsky was ill for most of the power struggle so Stalin had a huge advantage.

  1. Explain why trotsky rather than stalin became leader of the USSR in 1928

    And his belief in 'permanent revolution' so spreading communism to other countries while Stalin wanted to increase the USSR's power first, he wanted to concentrate on economic revival, he wanted to reform the USSR.

  2. Stalin and the Modernisation of the USSR

    They were basically an excuse for Stalin to get rid of them without seeming to the public that he was slaughtering people for no real reason. He would accuse the members of crimes, and out of the court, tell them that if they confessed, their families would be spared.

  1. Why did Stalin, Rather than Trotsky emerge as leader of the USSR in 1929

    Stalin was happy to stay in the background bwatching the left wing tearing itself apart and continued to build his power base. He emerged as the peacemaker, (which also added support for him) anxious to maintain party unity. However it was not only Stalin's political skills that helped him gain power, but his personal characteristics and qualities.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Farmers kept more of the produce for themselves. In 1926, about half the grain that had been sold outside the villages in 1913 was actually sold. More food meant lower prices and peasants did not want to sell their grain cheaply as other goods were expensive in comparison (The Scissors Crisis).

  1. Why did Stalin emerge as leader of Soviet Russia?

    The Triumvirate did in fact work in Stalin?s favour due to the fact that Zinoviev and Kamenev argued Stalin?s case when he faced the sack as a result of his rudeness and lack of tolerance as stated in Lenin?s testament.

  2. Assess Lenin's strengths and weaknesses as leader of Russia from 1917 to 1924.

    Lenin?s decision making skills were clearly shown, as his earlier estimate of what would happen had proved wholly correct; that the provisional government were becoming increasingly reactionary.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work