• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Stalin sign the Nazi-Soviet Pact?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Stalin sign the Nazi-Soviet Pact? On August 28th, 1939, the foreign minister of Nazi Germany, Joachim von Ribbentrop, and of the Soviet Union, Vyacheslav Molotov, signed in Moscow a Nazi-Soviet pact of nonaggression and neutrality, as a result of Hitler's efforts to ensure safe grounds in Eastern Europe. The agreement really guaranteed the Soviets Finland, Latvia, Estonia and the lands East of the line of Vistula, which divided Poland in between the two powers; the Nazis could conquer west from these lines, and neither power would judge one another's actions in their 'spheres of interest'. What was the real interest, however, of the Soviet leader , behind the signing of this pact, which rather guaranteed the proximity of another world war considering the terms under which it was signed? Why did Stalin overlook the communist policy and forge an alliance-like treaty with his nation's worst enemy and clearly an ideological counterpart? This essay will attempt to answer these questions and unveil the real motivations of Stalin's actions, much as most of his dictatorship's own foreign (and internal) policy. Stalin's first objectives- Throughout the first years of the 1930's it became clearly perceivable for Stalin's empire that the rise of Hitler was to be the largest threat to his empire. ...read more.

Middle

In the beginning, he limited his policies into signing assistance pacts with the Baltic states which were now to annex to the USSR. As Hitler begins to focus his war efforts in the west, Stalin begins to apply his terms of the Nazi-Soviet pact: establishes a puppet government in Finland, and, closing in to the boundaries, "admits" the Baltic states into the USSR, as well as certain provinces of Rumania and southeastern Europe, creating the Moldovian SSR with the leftover annexed territories. Once comfortable with this established buffer zone, the Iron Man begins to work into his internal policy, while the Nazis begin invading France. Internal policy objectives- This second step in the process- almost directly simultaneous to the first one- is the safe arms buildup. Stalin seizes the opportunity to transfer the military industry into central-eastern Russia, along the Eurasian boundaries. Huge industrial cities along the Urals, the Dnieper and the Dnester, such as Magnitogorsk, which had been the legacy of his 'industrialization at all costs', became great centres of production. Hundreds of thousands of tanks were developed and transferred to the western, urbanized territories along the civil war and NEP-resulting modern railroad systems. Stalin had no necessary risk to his industry or homeland now, and as he openly built up his army- while Hitler occupied denmark and France- he patiently awaited the inevitable, which still remained unexpected: Hitler's strike. ...read more.

Conclusion

In the end, while the reduced German army suffered grave and vital losses, Russian production and all-cost policy still allowed to maintain a supply which provided for a return, through the same buffer zone, into an invasion of a weakened germany by 1945, and the end of the war in Europe. Conclusions- Stalin obviously did not have an amicable intention with the signing of this pact with his evident nemesis. The inevitability of war was the trigger to a pact which only a totalitarian dictator such as Stalin would sign; he knew such treaty would imply the sacrifice of millions of people from central-eastern Europe and his own country, but this was the means into a defeat, by exhaustion, of the nazi eastern front. It becomes visible that stalin's peace time and war time policies begin to combine as he foresees the possible outcome of this pact, this being his NEP and 5YP industrialization, his great human losses and the defensive, rather than offensive strategy to defeat Hitler. Wether or not he estimated the great aid the winter became to his strategy could be discussed, but he counted with some clear, costly plans which makes one reconsider the seriousness of his phrase: "A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic". Clearly, and willingly, stalin becomes a great political strategists and sets what would be the USSR's cold war policy of the "Buffer Zone". ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    There are certainly areas of their regimes and ideologies which are surprisingly alike, the way in which they both developed their countries through the use of propaganda, how their regimes both turned extreme and how they used terror and violence in the end to maintain complete control of the state.

  2. A study of why the USSR signed a non aggression pact with Germany rather ...

    The negotiations never got of to a good start; from the beginning the Western Powers and the USSR wanted different things. Stalin suspected that the German army was ready to cross the Polish frontier. Hitler fears a collision with Russian troops in defense of Poland.

  1. How far were the policies of Chamberlain in facing the challenges from Nazi Germany ...

    The Poles refused to accept these proposals. Hitler secretly admitted that he was not simply after Danzig, as the question of lebensraum was at stake. He was prepared to gain Poland, by force if necessary. Over this issue, Hitler hoped for a diplomatic rather than a military triumph.

  2. Why did Stalin opt for the pact with Hitler in 1939?

    However, Lord Halifax, the British Foreign Secretary, was reluctant to make deals with a Communist regime. Eventually, the British sent in a minor official named Reginald Ranfurly Plunckett-Ernle-Erle-Drax. With his limited authority and lack of speed, the talks broke down. Stalin had concluded that the Western Powers were unreliable allies.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    The Germans endeavored to effect a counter-blockade of Britain and France by mines and submarines. On September 4, one day after the British and French declaration of war, a German U-boat sank the British liner Athenia without warning, causing loss of over 100 lives.

  2. Why did Stalin Agree to the Nazi-Soviet Pact?

    Stalin then ordered all the Communist organisations around the world to stop attempting revolutions and support any anti-fascist movements. Between 1934 and 1938, Maxim Litvinov, the German Foreign Minister attempted to build links between Britain and France, as to counter the threat of Germany.

  1. How EffectIVE Was Soviet Political Control In Eastern Europe In The 1950's & 1960's?

    It was seemingly the Soviet's response to the Truman Doctrine and tried to unify the Eastern European countries to fall behind a Soviet line. This was in matter of fact a way to control these countries. It adopted collectivisation in agriculture and nationalisation of industry; therefore allowing the Soviet's to make use of other countries resources.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Ideology and opinion in Stalin’s USSR: Stalin’s regime could rely on a certain amount of good will, generated by several factors ï 1. Regime associated itself with the idea of modernisation which was popular with many young people. 2. Soviet propaganda may have been successful in portraying the regime as the guardian of national security and patriotism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work