• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Stalin sign the Nazi-Soviet Pact?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Stalin sign the Nazi-Soviet Pact? On August 28th, 1939, the foreign minister of Nazi Germany, Joachim von Ribbentrop, and of the Soviet Union, Vyacheslav Molotov, signed in Moscow a Nazi-Soviet pact of nonaggression and neutrality, as a result of Hitler's efforts to ensure safe grounds in Eastern Europe. The agreement really guaranteed the Soviets Finland, Latvia, Estonia and the lands East of the line of Vistula, which divided Poland in between the two powers; the Nazis could conquer west from these lines, and neither power would judge one another's actions in their 'spheres of interest'. What was the real interest, however, of the Soviet leader , behind the signing of this pact, which rather guaranteed the proximity of another world war considering the terms under which it was signed? Why did Stalin overlook the communist policy and forge an alliance-like treaty with his nation's worst enemy and clearly an ideological counterpart? This essay will attempt to answer these questions and unveil the real motivations of Stalin's actions, much as most of his dictatorship's own foreign (and internal) policy. Stalin's first objectives- Throughout the first years of the 1930's it became clearly perceivable for Stalin's empire that the rise of Hitler was to be the largest threat to his empire. ...read more.

Middle

In the beginning, he limited his policies into signing assistance pacts with the Baltic states which were now to annex to the USSR. As Hitler begins to focus his war efforts in the west, Stalin begins to apply his terms of the Nazi-Soviet pact: establishes a puppet government in Finland, and, closing in to the boundaries, "admits" the Baltic states into the USSR, as well as certain provinces of Rumania and southeastern Europe, creating the Moldovian SSR with the leftover annexed territories. Once comfortable with this established buffer zone, the Iron Man begins to work into his internal policy, while the Nazis begin invading France. Internal policy objectives- This second step in the process- almost directly simultaneous to the first one- is the safe arms buildup. Stalin seizes the opportunity to transfer the military industry into central-eastern Russia, along the Eurasian boundaries. Huge industrial cities along the Urals, the Dnieper and the Dnester, such as Magnitogorsk, which had been the legacy of his 'industrialization at all costs', became great centres of production. Hundreds of thousands of tanks were developed and transferred to the western, urbanized territories along the civil war and NEP-resulting modern railroad systems. Stalin had no necessary risk to his industry or homeland now, and as he openly built up his army- while Hitler occupied denmark and France- he patiently awaited the inevitable, which still remained unexpected: Hitler's strike. ...read more.

Conclusion

In the end, while the reduced German army suffered grave and vital losses, Russian production and all-cost policy still allowed to maintain a supply which provided for a return, through the same buffer zone, into an invasion of a weakened germany by 1945, and the end of the war in Europe. Conclusions- Stalin obviously did not have an amicable intention with the signing of this pact with his evident nemesis. The inevitability of war was the trigger to a pact which only a totalitarian dictator such as Stalin would sign; he knew such treaty would imply the sacrifice of millions of people from central-eastern Europe and his own country, but this was the means into a defeat, by exhaustion, of the nazi eastern front. It becomes visible that stalin's peace time and war time policies begin to combine as he foresees the possible outcome of this pact, this being his NEP and 5YP industrialization, his great human losses and the defensive, rather than offensive strategy to defeat Hitler. Wether or not he estimated the great aid the winter became to his strategy could be discussed, but he counted with some clear, costly plans which makes one reconsider the seriousness of his phrase: "A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic". Clearly, and willingly, stalin becomes a great political strategists and sets what would be the USSR's cold war policy of the "Buffer Zone". ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    But this way of thinking is mad, and by stepping into this pattern of irrational reasoning, if perhaps only to understand it, Nolte created some very unfortunate impressions, namely, that Hitler's policies were understandable and to some extent justified, and that the Holocaust, however unfortunate, was not unique at all

  2. Why did Stalin Agree to the Nazi-Soviet Pact?

    Stalin then ordered all the Communist organisations around the world to stop attempting revolutions and support any anti-fascist movements. Between 1934 and 1938, Maxim Litvinov, the German Foreign Minister attempted to build links between Britain and France, as to counter the threat of Germany.

  1. How EffectIVE Was Soviet Political Control In Eastern Europe In The 1950's & 1960's?

    In 1955, the Warsaw Pact was set up. It was a military alliance of the communist states of Eastern Europe, to solidify Khrushchev's aim of uniting Eastern Europe. It wanted to coordinate the defence of the socialist bloc, however it really was dominated by the USSR, all countries had agreed to help each other.

  2. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    In 1991 Allan Bullock released his now renowned book, "Hitler and Stalin, Parallel Lives," in which he shows the striking similarities between the two men even though fascinatingly they were politically irreconcilable. Bullock's book manages to compare the two without avoiding the obvious differences they have, although he recognises the

  1. Why did the USSR sign an agreement with National Socialist Germany rather than Great ...

    o In September 1938, Stalin was not invited to the Munich Conference, attended by leaders of France, Britain, Germany and Italy. o During the night of September 29th 1938, Stalin called a Politburo meeting upon hearing of the Munich agreement.6 o On his first visit to the German Secretary of

  2. Russia and the Soviet Union 1917-1924

    The Bolsheviks were now moving in on the Winter Palace, where the provisional Government was meeting. During the afternoons, most of the Cossacks had slipped out of the palace, leaving some military cadets and the Women's death Battalion. At 9.00p.m the Aurora (a ship whose sailors supported the Bolsheviks)

  1. A study of why the USSR signed a non aggression pact with Germany rather ...

    Britain and France too feeble of a purpose to make reliable allies. In the winter of 1938-9 the Russians were in no state to withstand a German attack if the war was coming closer. Stalin feared that Russia would again be 'beaten for her backwardness'.

  2. Operation Barbarossa and the Russian Offensive.

    The Russians on the other hand were poorly trained, had poor equipment and had no solid places to defend. They had been at war since June 22nd, by the 16th of July 1941 the Germans were only 250 miles from Moscow and they had captured Smolensk.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work