• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Stalin sign the Nazi-Soviet Pact?

Extracts from this document...


Why did Stalin sign the Nazi-Soviet Pact? On August 28th, 1939, the foreign minister of Nazi Germany, Joachim von Ribbentrop, and of the Soviet Union, Vyacheslav Molotov, signed in Moscow a Nazi-Soviet pact of nonaggression and neutrality, as a result of Hitler's efforts to ensure safe grounds in Eastern Europe. The agreement really guaranteed the Soviets Finland, Latvia, Estonia and the lands East of the line of Vistula, which divided Poland in between the two powers; the Nazis could conquer west from these lines, and neither power would judge one another's actions in their 'spheres of interest'. What was the real interest, however, of the Soviet leader , behind the signing of this pact, which rather guaranteed the proximity of another world war considering the terms under which it was signed? Why did Stalin overlook the communist policy and forge an alliance-like treaty with his nation's worst enemy and clearly an ideological counterpart? This essay will attempt to answer these questions and unveil the real motivations of Stalin's actions, much as most of his dictatorship's own foreign (and internal) policy. Stalin's first objectives- Throughout the first years of the 1930's it became clearly perceivable for Stalin's empire that the rise of Hitler was to be the largest threat to his empire. ...read more.


In the beginning, he limited his policies into signing assistance pacts with the Baltic states which were now to annex to the USSR. As Hitler begins to focus his war efforts in the west, Stalin begins to apply his terms of the Nazi-Soviet pact: establishes a puppet government in Finland, and, closing in to the boundaries, "admits" the Baltic states into the USSR, as well as certain provinces of Rumania and southeastern Europe, creating the Moldovian SSR with the leftover annexed territories. Once comfortable with this established buffer zone, the Iron Man begins to work into his internal policy, while the Nazis begin invading France. Internal policy objectives- This second step in the process- almost directly simultaneous to the first one- is the safe arms buildup. Stalin seizes the opportunity to transfer the military industry into central-eastern Russia, along the Eurasian boundaries. Huge industrial cities along the Urals, the Dnieper and the Dnester, such as Magnitogorsk, which had been the legacy of his 'industrialization at all costs', became great centres of production. Hundreds of thousands of tanks were developed and transferred to the western, urbanized territories along the civil war and NEP-resulting modern railroad systems. Stalin had no necessary risk to his industry or homeland now, and as he openly built up his army- while Hitler occupied denmark and France- he patiently awaited the inevitable, which still remained unexpected: Hitler's strike. ...read more.


In the end, while the reduced German army suffered grave and vital losses, Russian production and all-cost policy still allowed to maintain a supply which provided for a return, through the same buffer zone, into an invasion of a weakened germany by 1945, and the end of the war in Europe. Conclusions- Stalin obviously did not have an amicable intention with the signing of this pact with his evident nemesis. The inevitability of war was the trigger to a pact which only a totalitarian dictator such as Stalin would sign; he knew such treaty would imply the sacrifice of millions of people from central-eastern Europe and his own country, but this was the means into a defeat, by exhaustion, of the nazi eastern front. It becomes visible that stalin's peace time and war time policies begin to combine as he foresees the possible outcome of this pact, this being his NEP and 5YP industrialization, his great human losses and the defensive, rather than offensive strategy to defeat Hitler. Wether or not he estimated the great aid the winter became to his strategy could be discussed, but he counted with some clear, costly plans which makes one reconsider the seriousness of his phrase: "A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic". Clearly, and willingly, stalin becomes a great political strategists and sets what would be the USSR's cold war policy of the "Buffer Zone". ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Russia and the Soviet Union 1917-1924

    of the Red army who voluntarily deserts his post will be shot.' 'Those guilty of harbouring deserters are liable to be shot.' * He gave a good impression to his people, by arriving with a train, a famous train that had been speeding to and fro along the different fronts.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    trying to throw up a new defense line along the Loire River. C. Italy declares War On June 10 Italy declared war on France and attacked in the Alps and along the Riviera. With the lack of vision characteristic of many continental statesmen, Mussolini assumed that the approaching fall of France meant the end of the war.

  1. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    Hitler only committed a similar act reluctantly in the Knight of the Long Knives in 1934. Unlike Stalin, Hitler built up loyalty among those below him. Stalin never believed he had this loyalty, because Stalin wasn't Lenin this meant he could be replaced.

  2. Why did Stalin opt for the pact with Hitler in 1939?

    Hence, the USSR joined the League of Nations in September 1934 and between 1934 and 1938, Maxim Litvinov, the Russian Foreign Minister attempted to counter the German threat by forging links with Britain and France. This initially resulted in the Franco-Russian Pact and the Soviet-Czechoslovak Pact.

  1. How far were the policies of Chamberlain in facing the challenges from Nazi Germany ...

    This was illustrated in the Fullham by-election in 1937, when the Conservative candidate, who was defending a majority of more than 14,000 votes, supported rearmament. He was defeated by nearly 5,000 votes by his pacifist Labour opponent. It is also displayed by the reception that Chamberlain received when he arrived from the Munich conference in September 1938.

  2. Operation Barbarossa and the Russian Offensive.

    The central army had captured 600,000 soldiers and 5,000 tanks, on their own. The Germans had said that this attack was because of the Soviet military build up on the border. It was said that Stalin had a "nervous breakdown".

  1. Why did the USSR sign an agreement with National Socialist Germany rather than Great ...

    o In September 1938, Stalin was not invited to the Munich Conference, attended by leaders of France, Britain, Germany and Italy. o During the night of September 29th 1938, Stalin called a Politburo meeting upon hearing of the Munich agreement.6 o On his first visit to the German Secretary of

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Cinema was taken up enthusiastically by the Communists, who realised its propaganda potential. Proletkino made political films. Culture in Stalin?s USSR - Cultural Revolution 1928-31: 1928 (the year of the First Five Year Plan): Cultural revolution started and lasted around three years.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work