• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Stalin win the struggle for power 1924-29?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Stalin win the struggle for power 1924-29? Richard Ward When Lenin died in 1924, there was vacancy in the position of recognised leader of the Communist Party. Five candidates emerged as contenders to fill the gap that Lenin had occupied: Bukharin, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Trotsky and Stalin. Bukharin was a comparatively moderate member of the CPSU, favouring the NEP and wanted to introduce Communist theory into Russia slowly. Kamenev and Zinoviev had played key roles in the October revolution 1917. Leon Trotsky was an orator of outstanding ability and a gifted leader. With no military training he had defeated the White Army in the civil war (1918-20) and was recognised as a figurehead perhaps more so than Lenin, who was more of a political strategist. "Lenin did keep rather in the background, not speaking often, not writing much, but largely engaged in directing organisational work in the Bolshevik camp, whilst Trotsky thundered forth at meetings in Petrograd."1 It was acknowledged within the Bolsheviks even when Lenin was alive, that Trotsky had a persuasive manner that could captivate and enthuse - aided in how he made his speeches relevant to the masses, not attempting to condense volumes of political theory into a speech that would pass over the heads of most Russian workers. ...read more.

Middle

Lenin had backed the hard working Stalin to the position of General Secretary but was unsure whether this had been a wise decision in hindsight. Stalin had 'unlimited authority' and Lenin was not sure as to whether Stalin would always use that power for the common good. In 1923 / 24, just before Lenin's death, Stalin used obscene language on the phone to Lenin's wife. Lenin amended his last testament, saying that Stalin was 'too rough' and 'must be removed'. Although Lenin died in 1924, Stalin's position as recognised leader of the Communists was not universally acknowledged until 1929, when Bukharin was voted off the Politburo. Between 1923 and 1925, two camps formed amongst the senior members of the Politburo. Zinoviev and Kamenev sided with Stalin against Trotsky in regards to the future of Communism in Russia. Trotsky wanted crash industrialisation and worldwide revolution, involving Russia in other countries' affairs whilst at the same time securing the footholds Communism had in Russia. Stalin (backed by Zinoviev and Kamenev) allied himself with the 'Leninist' policy of 'socialism in one country'. He argued that Trotsky was anti-Lenin, and began to dig holes in Trotsky's arguments and appearance in the party. ...read more.

Conclusion

His manipulation of power paved the way for his gradual elimination of competition within the party. His supposed greatest weakness (lack of intellectual firepower) was in the end his greatest strength. Trotsky underestimated Stalin and made a critical error in giving up control of the Red army, whether they would have supported him or not it was a strong position in the party to hold. Trotsky was a great leader, but was phased out by Stalin, who took greater notice of the political culture. This ruthlessness was undoubtedly key in Stalin's succession of Lenin. Zinoviev's defence of Stalin at the Politburo in 1924 surely made it only a matter of time before Stalin would take control of the party, the potential hole in his defence had been thoroughly plugged by the man that he would later expel from the party three years later. In conclusion, Stalin won the struggle for power through a combination of conscientiousness, ruthlessness and Trotsky's overconfidence. To suggest that Stalin was lucky in succeeding Lenin detracts from the strength of this combination. All this would however had fallen to pieces had Zinoviev understood the struggle for control of the CPSU in 1923-24. 1 'Revolutionary Silhouettes' by Anatoly Lunacharsky, pub. 1918 2 Mikhail Uritsky, Bolshevik activist, 1917 3 'The Prophet Unarmed, Trotsky 1921-1929' by I. Deutscher, pub. 1959 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why did Stalin win the struggle to power?

    Trotsky had a number of strengths which Stalin lacked. He was liked by the people of Russia and was the genious behind the Red Army in the Civil War. Trotsky was an extremely clever man and a great writer. He wrote himself "A great writer has the potential to inspire thousands of orators."

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    It was only at this point, some three weeks before Lenin's return, that the party had adopted a moderate line. Had this line not been reversed, Shliapnikov, who was vocally unhappy, probably would have left. Molotov was more reticent, but he and Zalutsky might well have followed.

  1. How did Stalin, who was illustrated by Leon Trotsky himself as 'the most eminent ...

    17 When in 1922 Stalin supported the idea of independence of Transcaucasian Georgia, his homeland, that sought to become an autonomous republic, Stalin was in fact dismissive and discourteous towards his national spokesmen to the extent that Lenin himself was obliged to intervene to resolve the situation and even sided

  2. Why did Leon Trotsky lose the 'Power Struggle' to Joseph Stalin in 1924?

    This, and other, doubts lowered his own resolve and thus his drive to succeed. Stalin, on the other hand, had the determination of a tiger and would not stop until he had reached his goal. These qualities, or vices, in him are evidenced also in his later political career, where

  1. .Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin and Stalin had many ...

    Lenin played a central role in the fall of the Tsarist System. He was a leader of a small party, the Bolsheviks, but his brilliant leadership, opportunism, and organizational skills allowed his party to seize and hold onto power. It is unlikely that without Lenin the Bolshevik party would have succeeded in taking control of the Revolution and Russia.

  2. Links between the two regimes of Lenin and Stalin.

    that he might well be charged with outright plagiarism"19 he concludes on Stalin with a positive note. Being a socialist in his political inclinations´┐Ż, thus compassionate with communist ideology, he talks of the rewards of such policies, describing Stalin's economy as the "first truly gigantic experiment in planned economy, the

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Education: After the revolution, there had been a great experiment with education. More active learning styles were promoted and children were often encouraged to do more socially useful work. During the Cultural Revolution, Stalin changed this. There were problems ï teachers were untrained and not communists therefore did not like nor approve of the new syllabus.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    Th whites aim was to defeat the Bolsheviks. The Whites had the advantage of support from foreign powers suh as Britain, France, Japan and the USA, along with several other countries. Their governments did not want to see Bolshevism spread out in Europe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work