• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Stalin win the struggle for power 1924-29?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Stalin win the struggle for power 1924-29? Richard Ward When Lenin died in 1924, there was vacancy in the position of recognised leader of the Communist Party. Five candidates emerged as contenders to fill the gap that Lenin had occupied: Bukharin, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Trotsky and Stalin. Bukharin was a comparatively moderate member of the CPSU, favouring the NEP and wanted to introduce Communist theory into Russia slowly. Kamenev and Zinoviev had played key roles in the October revolution 1917. Leon Trotsky was an orator of outstanding ability and a gifted leader. With no military training he had defeated the White Army in the civil war (1918-20) and was recognised as a figurehead perhaps more so than Lenin, who was more of a political strategist. "Lenin did keep rather in the background, not speaking often, not writing much, but largely engaged in directing organisational work in the Bolshevik camp, whilst Trotsky thundered forth at meetings in Petrograd."1 It was acknowledged within the Bolsheviks even when Lenin was alive, that Trotsky had a persuasive manner that could captivate and enthuse - aided in how he made his speeches relevant to the masses, not attempting to condense volumes of political theory into a speech that would pass over the heads of most Russian workers. ...read more.

Middle

Lenin had backed the hard working Stalin to the position of General Secretary but was unsure whether this had been a wise decision in hindsight. Stalin had 'unlimited authority' and Lenin was not sure as to whether Stalin would always use that power for the common good. In 1923 / 24, just before Lenin's death, Stalin used obscene language on the phone to Lenin's wife. Lenin amended his last testament, saying that Stalin was 'too rough' and 'must be removed'. Although Lenin died in 1924, Stalin's position as recognised leader of the Communists was not universally acknowledged until 1929, when Bukharin was voted off the Politburo. Between 1923 and 1925, two camps formed amongst the senior members of the Politburo. Zinoviev and Kamenev sided with Stalin against Trotsky in regards to the future of Communism in Russia. Trotsky wanted crash industrialisation and worldwide revolution, involving Russia in other countries' affairs whilst at the same time securing the footholds Communism had in Russia. Stalin (backed by Zinoviev and Kamenev) allied himself with the 'Leninist' policy of 'socialism in one country'. He argued that Trotsky was anti-Lenin, and began to dig holes in Trotsky's arguments and appearance in the party. ...read more.

Conclusion

His manipulation of power paved the way for his gradual elimination of competition within the party. His supposed greatest weakness (lack of intellectual firepower) was in the end his greatest strength. Trotsky underestimated Stalin and made a critical error in giving up control of the Red army, whether they would have supported him or not it was a strong position in the party to hold. Trotsky was a great leader, but was phased out by Stalin, who took greater notice of the political culture. This ruthlessness was undoubtedly key in Stalin's succession of Lenin. Zinoviev's defence of Stalin at the Politburo in 1924 surely made it only a matter of time before Stalin would take control of the party, the potential hole in his defence had been thoroughly plugged by the man that he would later expel from the party three years later. In conclusion, Stalin won the struggle for power through a combination of conscientiousness, ruthlessness and Trotsky's overconfidence. To suggest that Stalin was lucky in succeeding Lenin detracts from the strength of this combination. All this would however had fallen to pieces had Zinoviev understood the struggle for control of the CPSU in 1923-24. 1 'Revolutionary Silhouettes' by Anatoly Lunacharsky, pub. 1918 2 Mikhail Uritsky, Bolshevik activist, 1917 3 'The Prophet Unarmed, Trotsky 1921-1929' by I. Deutscher, pub. 1959 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why did Stalin win the struggle for power in 1923 – 9?

    This formation was fairly reasonable and worked well until Stalin started to chose the members to move up himself. When the people in the Party realised this they would do what they could to impress him and therefore the party was evolving into one where everyone supported Stalin.

  2. Why did Stalin win the struggle to power?

    Trotsky had a number of strengths which Stalin lacked. He was liked by the people of Russia and was the genious behind the Red Army in the Civil War. Trotsky was an extremely clever man and a great writer. He wrote himself "A great writer has the potential to inspire thousands of orators."

  1. .Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin and Stalin had many ...

    Whereas the Provisional Government wanted compromise, Lenin wanted Revolution. In Lenin's April theses he urged Revolution. He called for an end to the 'Capitalist War', and demanded that power should be given to the Soviets- elected comities of workers, peasants, and soldiers.

  2. Explain Why Trotsky and Bukharin were defeated

    Lenin's testaments which criticised each party members and explained who he believed would be the best candidate had Stalin down as the worst successor because of his rude and ignorant personality. This meant that Stalin efforts would have amounted to nothing, and he was lucky to escape it when Zinoviev

  1. The enormous role that Trotsky played in the success of the Bolsheviks up until ...

    Shortly after this order was issued, an entire battalion attempted to desert from battle. One in ten of the soldiers were executed by a firing squad at the command of Trotsky. However, this was the approach that perhaps was needed to turn an unruly bunch of factory workers into a disciplined fighting machine.

  2. How did Stalin, who was illustrated by Leon Trotsky himself as 'the most eminent ...

    When all other forms of government could count upon precedent or tradition as a guide to governing their countries, Lenin's Party faced the fact that their revolutionary government did not possess such advantages. Additionally the highly radical degree of the Russian Revolution was a first in history, assuring the chastity of the Bolsheviks in matters of government.

  1. In what ways did the careers of Stalin and Trotsky differ in the years ...

    He believed, like Lenin, that the provisional government must be overthrown and consecrated all of his energies to marshal support for the uprising of the Bolsheviks. In November he managed to direct workers and soldiers into the revolution. He was the main organiser of events.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Ideology and opinion in Stalin’s USSR: Stalin’s regime could rely on a certain amount of good will, generated by several factors ï 1. Regime associated itself with the idea of modernisation which was popular with many young people. 2. Soviet propaganda may have been successful in portraying the regime as the guardian of national security and patriotism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work