• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Stalin win the struggle to power?

Extracts from this document...


Why Did Stalin Win The Struggle To Power? When Lenin died, he left no clear successor to lead the Communist Party. Due to the lack of one leader, a group of strong figures emerged known as the "Collective Leadership". This could not remain however and one had to take the position as party leader, therefore resulting in the "struggle to power". By 1929, Stalin had become a dominant force and eventually won the struggle. Stalin's rise to power was by no means inevitable however. He won the struggle due to a number of factors; the most significant of factors perhaps was not to do with his own strength but the weaknesses and fatal errors made by his worthy and perfectly capable opponents. Stalin's first taste of real power in the Communist Party was in April 1922 when he was assigned the role of General Secretary. Traditionally, the ideas of Communism oppose those of bureaucracy. However dealing with the complexities of government forced the party into becoming more centralised. The job description for the General Secreatary was to organise such matters. This position and the growing centralisation of the party put Stalin in a unique position to influence job appointments. ...read more.


The publication of a letter Trotsky wrote to his friend in 1913 was also a major set back. The letter spoke badly of Lenin as at the time the letter was written, Trotsky and Lenin were in opposing parties. The publication of the letter was published straight after Lenin's death and therefore led readers of the "Pravda" to believe that Trotsky was attacking Lenin when the country were mourning their beloved leader. Trotsky considered Stalin to be a man of only "moderate talents" and it was because of this that he didn't take Stalin's attempts to obtain power seriously. If Trotsky had taken his knowledge of Lenin's views on Stalin to the Central Committee, Stalin would've probably been removed from power. However Trotsky didn't just remain silent on the matter, he also persuaded his supporters to keep Stalin as General Secretary. It was not just Trotsky of the Communist Party that made fatal errors. Kameniev and Zinoviev, two key members were also blind to the forthcoming attack of Stalin. Along with Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kameniev failed to fight for the publication of Lenin's testament: a vital factor in showing the weaknesses of Stalin as a leader. ...read more.


I believe that the centralised nature of the Communist party that begun under Lenin made it much more easy to control. The combination of new Communist members being poorly educated and easy to control and Stalin's skills of manipulation meant his support base was ever growing, unlike his rivals'. I also think that Stalin's political skills aided his arise but by no means secured his position as leader. In my opinion, it was Trotsky's downfalls that secured Stalin's position of power. Too many fatal mistakes were made by his rivals which seemed to happen at perfect timing. Trotsky was constantly undermining Stalin's attempts to obtain power and never took him seriously. Because of this, he didn't appear to work hard enough in blocking Stalin's attempts or building a loyal support base. Lenin described him as being over confidant, similarly to a number of historians who pointed out that Trotsky simply assumed he would automatically be Lenin's successor. One claimed "Trotsky considered it beneath his dignity to engage actively in a struggle to power." It appears that Trotsky's self assured nature had blinded him to Stalin's consistent plans. This is why I believe that if Trotsky and Stalin's other main rivals had been a little more aware, Stalin would've by no means been able to take position as dictator of Russia. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How did Joseph Stalin rise to power?

    Also luck played a part in the fact that there were many weaknesses in Stalin's political opponents. For instance, Trotsky was an arrogant man, strangely this helped Stalin. Of all the times Stalin manipulated Trotsky, like the incident at Lenin's funeral, not once did Trotsky speak out and state what Stalin had been doing.

  2. Why did Stalin win the struggle for power 1924-29?

    Stalin's conscientiousness was his success in the long term. He was happy to accept whatever job was going in the party, so long as it kept him out of having to speak in public often. Seemingly boring jobs such as 'Commissar for Nationalities' and 'General Secretary' allowed him to lay strong foundations for himself within the party.

  1. Why did Leon Trotsky lose the 'Power Struggle' to Joseph Stalin in 1924?

    However, Trotsky is said to have taken the idea that Stalin posed a threat to him as "a bad joke", and thus lost his best chances to defeat Stalin In addition, Trotsky had another fault which brought him down, and this one too was articulated by Lenin in his testament,

  2. .Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin and Stalin had many ...

    Discipline was tightened throughout the educational system, because Stalin did not approve of the liberal methods in many schools. Stalin invested huge sums of money into training schemes based in colleges and in the work place. Adults were not neglected.

  1. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    the fascists, for example Marshall Diaz is reported to have told him "the army will do its duty; however it would be well not to put it to the test"11 The King also feared that his cousin, The Duke of Aosta who was near the Fascist headquarters in Perugia may have been after the crown.

  2. Historians such as Pipes and Volkogonov have made the interpretation that Lenin was a ...

    Peasants who resisted the requisitioning of their crops or who hoarded grain were often shot at. Industrial unrest was similarly crushed. Therefore the Bolshevik regime was aware of the fact that there may be some opposition to the regime from, hence the regime chose to use the Red Terror in order to deal with any possible opposition.

  1. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    Kolchak, one of the leaders of the 'white' armies was executed and the other leaders retreated and left Russia. Lenin's harsh discipline and policies during the civil war caused three years of devastation after World War 1, he had gained the support of 0.5 millions communist to join the 'Red

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    Workers could have two weeks paid holiday each year. They also had insurance benefits such as sich pay, unemployment was also paid in order to allow workers continue feeding their respectives families, furthermore there was old age pensions. This Law did in fact benefit all the workers who some of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work