• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Stalin win the struggle to power?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why Did Stalin Win The Struggle To Power? When Lenin died, he left no clear successor to lead the Communist Party. Due to the lack of one leader, a group of strong figures emerged known as the "Collective Leadership". This could not remain however and one had to take the position as party leader, therefore resulting in the "struggle to power". By 1929, Stalin had become a dominant force and eventually won the struggle. Stalin's rise to power was by no means inevitable however. He won the struggle due to a number of factors; the most significant of factors perhaps was not to do with his own strength but the weaknesses and fatal errors made by his worthy and perfectly capable opponents. Stalin's first taste of real power in the Communist Party was in April 1922 when he was assigned the role of General Secretary. Traditionally, the ideas of Communism oppose those of bureaucracy. However dealing with the complexities of government forced the party into becoming more centralised. The job description for the General Secreatary was to organise such matters. This position and the growing centralisation of the party put Stalin in a unique position to influence job appointments. ...read more.

Middle

The publication of a letter Trotsky wrote to his friend in 1913 was also a major set back. The letter spoke badly of Lenin as at the time the letter was written, Trotsky and Lenin were in opposing parties. The publication of the letter was published straight after Lenin's death and therefore led readers of the "Pravda" to believe that Trotsky was attacking Lenin when the country were mourning their beloved leader. Trotsky considered Stalin to be a man of only "moderate talents" and it was because of this that he didn't take Stalin's attempts to obtain power seriously. If Trotsky had taken his knowledge of Lenin's views on Stalin to the Central Committee, Stalin would've probably been removed from power. However Trotsky didn't just remain silent on the matter, he also persuaded his supporters to keep Stalin as General Secretary. It was not just Trotsky of the Communist Party that made fatal errors. Kameniev and Zinoviev, two key members were also blind to the forthcoming attack of Stalin. Along with Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kameniev failed to fight for the publication of Lenin's testament: a vital factor in showing the weaknesses of Stalin as a leader. ...read more.

Conclusion

I believe that the centralised nature of the Communist party that begun under Lenin made it much more easy to control. The combination of new Communist members being poorly educated and easy to control and Stalin's skills of manipulation meant his support base was ever growing, unlike his rivals'. I also think that Stalin's political skills aided his arise but by no means secured his position as leader. In my opinion, it was Trotsky's downfalls that secured Stalin's position of power. Too many fatal mistakes were made by his rivals which seemed to happen at perfect timing. Trotsky was constantly undermining Stalin's attempts to obtain power and never took him seriously. Because of this, he didn't appear to work hard enough in blocking Stalin's attempts or building a loyal support base. Lenin described him as being over confidant, similarly to a number of historians who pointed out that Trotsky simply assumed he would automatically be Lenin's successor. One claimed "Trotsky considered it beneath his dignity to engage actively in a struggle to power." It appears that Trotsky's self assured nature had blinded him to Stalin's consistent plans. This is why I believe that if Trotsky and Stalin's other main rivals had been a little more aware, Stalin would've by no means been able to take position as dictator of Russia. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Historians such as Pipes and Volkogonov have made the interpretation that Lenin was a ...

    an extent, the control of War Communism was needed, as most factory committees were not professional and experienced enough to control production for the Civil War, nor did they have the ability to organise the supplies for the cities and Red Army.

  2. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    He undertook 'Russification' where all non Russian were to become Russian citizens. Peasants lived in the grim countryside within deep depression. Most peasant grew resentful of the government and would have found it hard to survive without the private plots of land they were allocated.

  1. Who Was More Important - Lenin Or Stalin?

    of the Bolshevik Party. One of the most renowned forms of terror Stalin was used was purging. The Purges which occurred between 1928-1937 involved the mass murder of 10 million. By 1934, when things began to improve after Collectivisation, a large group in the Communist Party thought that it was

  2. Why did Leon Trotsky lose the 'Power Struggle' to Joseph Stalin in 1924?

    However, Trotsky is said to have taken the idea that Stalin posed a threat to him as "a bad joke", and thus lost his best chances to defeat Stalin In addition, Trotsky had another fault which brought him down, and this one too was articulated by Lenin in his testament,

  1. How did Stalin, who was illustrated by Leon Trotsky himself as 'the most eminent ...

    Luck: The Death of Yakov Sverdlov (1919) One of the decidedly significant pillars of Stalin's successful rise to power is the death of Yakov Sverdlov, a highly respected influential Bolshevik who continually supported Lenin and developed a reputation as one of the Party's most excellent orators.

  2. How did Stalin Rise to Power between 1922 – 1929?

    Lenin's Testament At the time of Lenin's death in 1924, Stalin, as well as being in the politburo, also held four vital posts to which he had been appointed between 1917 and 1922: Commissar for Nationalities, Liaison Officer between the Politburo and the Orgburo (the Party's organising body), Head of

  1. .Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin and Stalin had many ...

    For example by 1939 approximately 3 million people were dead and 9 million were political prisoners through his orders. He masterminded the "Gulag" where millions would die in labour camps for trivial offences. His ruthlessness continued throughout the Second World War up until his death.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    The population in general felt more prosperous. Another positive aspect Lenin did during his rule was the Labour Law he introduced. This entitled eight-hour day this meant that workers had much more freedon in concentrating in their personal lives and they were able to spent more time with their families.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work