• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the 1905 revolution not lead to the downfall of the Tsar when in February 1917, it did?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?Why did the 1905 revolution not lead to the downfall of the Tsar when in February 1917, it did?? The 1905 & 1917 revolution showed the resentment among the whole Russian population of the Tsarist government but the 1917 revolution was the only revolution which was able to lead to the abdication of the Tsar. Although there were many reasons which caused the downfall of the Tsar such as the fact the Tsar was incompetent and didn?t listen to his ministers? advice towards Russia?s problems. ...read more.

Middle

many of the opposition groups were executed and thousands fled into exile (including Lenin, Trotsky) however the February Revolution in 1917, many of the original members of the army were killed so the army was made out of conscripts so the members were workers or peasants so they had experienced the incompetence of the Russian officers and the lack of military direction from the Tsar. So the when February revolution started, many refused to fire the protestors and joined the revolution themselves. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also continuous defeats and loss of territory continued to affect Russia as there were badly trained officers & generals which were appointed because they supported the Tsar not because of their ability towards the army which revealed the failure of the tsarist government because it caused economic, social & military problems within Russia. Another reason was the Tsar?s actions. The 1905 revolution saw the Tsar declare an October Manifesto which caused the end to the revlolution as he gave the Russian civilians what they wanted. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent were the actions of Tsar Nicholas II during the First World ...

    The shortages of food and fuel were chronic - by February 1917 only 300 wagons containing grain of the 1000 needed were getting to the city. Bakeries closed down, and bread queues began to form. The lack of fuel was worsened by the harsh winter the people suffered at the end of 1916.

  2. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    Although this demand was supported by some of the generals, and by Britain and France, Nicholas refused to make any concessions to the Progressive Bloc.

  1. How did Tsar survive the 1905 revolution?

    Although there had been mutinies earlier in the year including the Potenkin incident in the summer of 1905 the troops who returned from the Far East at the end of the war proved loyal enough to be used against the strikers.

  2. How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs ...

    This situation was worsened in early 1917 when fuel shortages caused more factories to stop working and bakeries closed which was an issue because a shortage of bread prompted panic as bread is a staple food item needed for survival, people became worried they would starve.

  1. Russian Revolution Sources Questions

    This metaphor symbolises how the communists should concentrate on building up the economy of the USSR and not wasting money on helping fellow communists abroad. Stalin believed that with a strong and prosperous economy the capitalists wouldn't dare attack. This disagreement was the essence of the power struggle between Stalin

  2. Why did Tsarism survive the 1905 revolution but not the 1917?

    This is a big difference compared to the 1917 revolution. This event called the "Bloody Sunday" and it somewhat shattered the image of the Tsar being the protector of the little people. There was no alternate government ready, most people were even divided over the type of socialism they preferred

  1. Why did Tsarism survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March 1917

    This was also mainly due to the lack of unity and coordination among the radicals and revolutionaries, as their outbreaks, though spontaneous, were sparse and unorganised which meant the armed forces and police could easily suppress them one by one.

  2. Why did revolution in Russia succeed in February 1917 and not in 1905? (30 ...

    This consequently worked to make his abdication an inevitability. This is not the sole reason for the success of the February Revolution however. The actions of the Tsar, in relation to the war, also proved significant in alienating those traditionally loyal to him.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work