• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the 1905 revolution not lead to the downfall of the Tsar when in February 1917, it did?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?Why did the 1905 revolution not lead to the downfall of the Tsar when in February 1917, it did?? The 1905 & 1917 revolution showed the resentment among the whole Russian population of the Tsarist government but the 1917 revolution was the only revolution which was able to lead to the abdication of the Tsar. Although there were many reasons which caused the downfall of the Tsar such as the fact the Tsar was incompetent and didn?t listen to his ministers? advice towards Russia?s problems. ...read more.

Middle

many of the opposition groups were executed and thousands fled into exile (including Lenin, Trotsky) however the February Revolution in 1917, many of the original members of the army were killed so the army was made out of conscripts so the members were workers or peasants so they had experienced the incompetence of the Russian officers and the lack of military direction from the Tsar. So the when February revolution started, many refused to fire the protestors and joined the revolution themselves. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also continuous defeats and loss of territory continued to affect Russia as there were badly trained officers & generals which were appointed because they supported the Tsar not because of their ability towards the army which revealed the failure of the tsarist government because it caused economic, social & military problems within Russia. Another reason was the Tsar?s actions. The 1905 revolution saw the Tsar declare an October Manifesto which caused the end to the revlolution as he gave the Russian civilians what they wanted. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    Although this demand was supported by some of the generals, and by Britain and France, Nicholas refused to make any concessions to the Progressive Bloc.

  2. The 1917 Revolution.

    Nevertheless they were dominated by the political parties of the extreme Left - SRs, Mensheviks, Bolsheviks - and were not inclined to take orders from a government formed by the parties of the bourgeoisie. Moreover, in fear that generals and army officers might attempt to restore the collapsed Tsardom, they

  1. How did Tsar survive the 1905 revolution?

    Both the Liberals and Peasants, two of the main opposition groups to the Tsar had readily taken to the idea of concessions and had willingly accepted the government's political and economic changes such as the October Manifesto proved that both these groups were never in favour of a revolution and

  2. Why did Tsarism survive the 1905 revolution but not the 1917?

    This is a big difference compared to the 1917 revolution. This event called the "Bloody Sunday" and it somewhat shattered the image of the Tsar being the protector of the little people. There was no alternate government ready, most people were even divided over the type of socialism they preferred

  1. How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs ...

    as a result Hunger and Famine were a constant reality of for Russian people during the war. Furthermore transport broke down under stress war and caused major food shortages. The growth in railway between 1881 to1941 was an impressive achievement but didn't meet the demands of war and the transport

  2. How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs ...

    The reputation of the Romanovs had been declining as the controversial peasant, 'Rasputin', made his way into governmental affairs due to his ability to ease the pain of the tsar's sick young prince. Alexandra gave him great political control in the affairs of the state.

  1. Why did revolution in Russia succeed in February 1917 and not in 1905? (30 ...

    The enormous casualties from 1914-17 of almost two million, much greater than those of the Russo-Japanese War, also worked to rapidly diminish support for the Tsar. The defection of the army in February 1917, a culmination of such discontent and disillusionment, meant that the Tsar had no coercive weapon by which to stifle revolution.

  2. How far was the February Revolution caused by the length of World War One?

    If the war went wrong, all anger would go solely to the Tsar. The Progressive Bloc may not exist without the war, but nevertheless it is not directly linked to the length of the war. Furthermore Nicholas put himself in charge of the army in September 1915.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work