• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the 1905 revolution not lead to the downfall of the Tsar when in February 1917, it did?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?Why did the 1905 revolution not lead to the downfall of the Tsar when in February 1917, it did?? The 1905 & 1917 revolution showed the resentment among the whole Russian population of the Tsarist government but the 1917 revolution was the only revolution which was able to lead to the abdication of the Tsar. Although there were many reasons which caused the downfall of the Tsar such as the fact the Tsar was incompetent and didn?t listen to his ministers? advice towards Russia?s problems. ...read more.

Middle

many of the opposition groups were executed and thousands fled into exile (including Lenin, Trotsky) however the February Revolution in 1917, many of the original members of the army were killed so the army was made out of conscripts so the members were workers or peasants so they had experienced the incompetence of the Russian officers and the lack of military direction from the Tsar. So the when February revolution started, many refused to fire the protestors and joined the revolution themselves. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also continuous defeats and loss of territory continued to affect Russia as there were badly trained officers & generals which were appointed because they supported the Tsar not because of their ability towards the army which revealed the failure of the tsarist government because it caused economic, social & military problems within Russia. Another reason was the Tsar?s actions. The 1905 revolution saw the Tsar declare an October Manifesto which caused the end to the revlolution as he gave the Russian civilians what they wanted. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    Although this demand was supported by some of the generals, and by Britain and France, Nicholas refused to make any concessions to the Progressive Bloc.

  2. The 1917 Revolution.

    The writ of the Soviets was recognized by an ever-increasing number of workers and soldiers, which gave it, in spite of itself, a position of authority which could not be ignored. The Provisional Government was thus in effect excluded from control of the army.

  1. How did Tsar survive the 1905 revolution?

    With the exception of Lev Trotsky who was one of ringleaders in the siege of headquarters of the St Petersburg soviet, none of the revolutionaries actually played a significant part, which could be used to back up the idea that the events of 1905 coupe not in reality be classed as a revolution.

  2. How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs ...

    Role of the of Tsar in the War is an important factor in why the war helped to cause the downfall of the Romanov's in 1915 the Tsar formally took control of the army however the strong central leadership which the war desperately needed was not being provided by the

  1. Why did Tsarism survive the 1905 revolution but not the 1917?

    This is a big difference compared to the 1917 revolution. This event called the "Bloody Sunday" and it somewhat shattered the image of the Tsar being the protector of the little people. There was no alternate government ready, most people were even divided over the type of socialism they preferred

  2. Why did Tsarism survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March 1917

    It was difficult for the revolutionaries to be united because their different aims meant they were divided and often fought amongst them selves; the Liberals wanted to share power with the Tsar, the Social Revolutionaries wanted peasant ownership over land, and the Social Democrats wanted a complete change of society and removal of the Tsar.

  1. Why did revolution in Russia succeed in February 1917 and not in 1905? (30 ...

    In 1905 the Tsar was very much ?behind the scenes? ? criticism towards him was not as sharply focussed as it was by 1917. In 1915, by appointing himself as Commander in Chief of the military, the Tsar managed to directly implicate himself in all war failures.

  2. How far was the February Revolution caused by the length of World War One?

    If the war went wrong, all anger would go solely to the Tsar. The Progressive Bloc may not exist without the war, but nevertheless it is not directly linked to the length of the war. Furthermore Nicholas put himself in charge of the army in September 1915.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work