• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the campaign for Parliamentary reform fail in its objectives in the period 1780-1820?

Extracts from this document...


Why did the campaign for Parliamentary reform fail in its objectives in the period 1780-1820? There were numerous reasons that accounted for why the campaign for Parliamentary reform failed in its objectives in the period 1780-1820, with arguably the most significant factor being that those in Parliament did not actually feel the need to reform the electoral system because of the lack of unified pressure from the British public. There was a substantial call for Parliamentary reform between 1780 and 1820, but the separate groups which were pressing for reform did not unite and failed to appeal to the wider regions of the population and therefore, reform was not at the top of the agenda between these decades. The representation of Britain in the House of Commons certainly did not reflect the composition of the country, as Cornwall sent 44 members to Parliament, which was only one fewer than the whole of Scotland combined. Large industrial towns such as Manchester and Birmingham, consisting of 320,000 people, did not send a single representative to the upper chamber of Parliament. Various rules and qualifications such as a minimum level of income and possessing a large enough fireplace were often required to vote in a General Election, rules which were being called into question by various groups in society such as the London Corresponding Society. However, although these aspects of Parliament were clearly undemocratic, the campaign for reform failed because the general British public did not impose their views on those in power which would result in reform coming about within Britain's sole governing body. ...read more.


This led many of the more privileged in society to express the revolutionary activities in France as a threat to the nature of the British system, a system that had protected the rights and liberties of citizens with documents like the Bill of Rights in 1689. 'I would rather forgo for ever the advantages of reform, than risk for a moment the existence of the British constitution.' - Pitt the Younger Parliamentary reform was a topic which obviously brought about serious and hard fought out debates between those for and against such reforms and before the French revolution, it was a topic met with social acceptance and discussion would be tolerated. However, after the revolution in France, it no longer was a topic of discussion in terms of its influence on British politics. Reaction to the revolution made even those MP's who were in favour of an element of reform, totally hostile to the issue. The impact of the activities in France became even more significant on the chances of parliamentary reform when Britain engaged in a 22 year was with France in 1793. Those who had previously supported the French revolution as a step forward in democracy and supported the basic fundamental ideological principles of the revolution were portrayed and labelled as traitors. If a country is at war and there are citizens supporting the enemy to which thousands of lives are being lost each year, it seems as thought they are urging for ...read more.


They had a mass disliking to the concept of reform because their power until then had been based upon their patronage, land or aristocratic backgrounds. The removal of this power to command the lower classes was not acceptable and therefore the conservatives took a staunch view over the issue of reform. Several trade unions organised meetings in 1795 and this method of attempting to raise public support for parliamentary reform was hijacked by several radical groups and also endeavoured to try and intimidate those in authority. This led parliament to pass acts which banned future meetings, showing that parliament did not tolerate the slightest inclinations of activities which would threatened the British system of government. The government also had the backing of a large, well-organised and disciplined army which reduced the level of activities that radicals could carry out at street level. The fact that support for reform was generally concentrated in small areas meant that there was no realistic chance of any sort of uprising occurring as in France, because there wasn't consistent support for reform across the whole country. The main reason why parliamentary reform failed in its objectives from 1780 to 1820 was the fact that those in parliament, who were realistically the only collective group of individuals who would bring about reform, would only legislate for its own reform under threat. The simple fact of the matter was that the different groups arguing for reform did not threaten Parliament, as they did not wield a large support base and used different methods to achieve their different goals. James Moore 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why did Charles V fail to crush Luther?

    Therefore due to the appeal of Luther's message, many of these leaders converted to Lutheranism, causing individual pockets of Lutheranism to emerge throughout Germany, making it hard for Charles to crush Luther. Charles V's efforts to crush Luther were also hampered by the State of the Catholic Church.


    The adult population (Eng/Wales) was over 5 million but only 20% could vote. * The distribution of population had changed. Industrial areas were expanding rapidly but there was no recognition of this in seat distribution. Internal Parliamentary Pressures * Real pressure from the left (e.g. John Bright; Foster and Stansfield).

  1. Free essay

    Why, between 1903 and 1914, did the women's suffrage movement fail to achieve its ...

    women as they this was a lot cheaper then the Divorce Courts, and in 1882 a second Married Women's Property Act allowed women to keep all property and income acquired independently of their husbands. It was also that a lot of women were going into employment like in 1871 nearly 31% of the British labour force was women.

  2. Why did the campaign for Parliamentary Reform fail to achieve anything in the Period ...

    However this growing urbanisation caused problems, both politically and socially, firstly because of the speed of the changes and the fact that the government was reluctant to reform parliament. This can be seen simply by the many anomalies of the current electoral system where areas like Manchester with a population

  1. Henry II (1154 - 1189) is generally seen as the main catalyst in the ...

    Dr Mike Ibeji, 'BBC History -Monarchs and Leaders, 'The Character and Legacy of Henry II', Pages 1-2 http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/state/monarchs_leaders/henry11_ibeji01.shtml (Visited 17/12/2002) 16. Early Royal Courts - Clanchy M.T, 'Magna Carta and the Common Pleas' in Studies in Medieval History presented to R.H.C Davis (H. Mayr-Harting and R.I. Moore ed..1985) pp.219-232 17.

  2. How significant was the role of individuals in the changing for the poor between ...

    Owen realized that a happy/educated and healthy workforce gave the best results in his business. It is debatable whether Owen only educated and gave good hours to his workers for profit maximisation or whether he genuinely believed in helping the poor, either way he did show that offering a fair

  1. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    * Women?s participation in local and party politics suggested that women could be trusted with the vote. Women such as Florence Nightingale were cited as examples of how women could contribute to politics. * Means to an end * Suffragists argued that the right to vote would force Governments to take women?s issues more seriously.

  2. The changing position of women and the suffrage question

    They wrote letters and formulated petitions, held mass-meetings, organised protest marches and targeted specific parliamentary candidates. These tactics proved to be particularly effective, especially the ?poster and placard? campaigns. The highly successful campaign saw the act repealed in 1886. Politics ? Women?s Suffrage Campaign After the 1867 Reform Act failed

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work